Literature DB >> 24431715

A Comparison of the Change in Mandibular Condyle/Fossa Relationship with the Use of Anatomic Teeth and Semi-anatomic Teeth in Complete Denture Prosthesis.

Satyabodh S Guttal1, Ramesh K Nadiger1, Abhishek Suvarna1.   

Abstract

The association between dental occlusion and mandibular condyle/fossa relation has long been debated and still remains one of the most controversial issues in Prosthodontics. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of two different tooth forms on the condyle/fossa relation recorded during jaw relation process. Twenty edentulous patients were selected with good neuromuscular control. For each patient two pairs of dentures were fabricated with anatomic teeth and semi-anatomic teeth. Condylar position was recorded using a digital volume tomography (DVT) following the process of jaw relation (following extra oral tracing). Subsequent laboratory remounting, the denture insertion was done and DVTs were taken again for both the dentures separately. Two methods were used to evaluate the condyle/fossa relation viz. (1) Zhang's method (2) Brewka's method. The obtained values were then subjected to statistical analysis. The statistical significance was set as at 0.05 %. The mandibular concentricity were analysed during the process of jaw relation and after the insertion of dentures with the two different tooth forms. Statistical analysis indicated that no statistically significant difference of the influence of different posterior tooth forms on the condyle/fossa relation recorded during jaw relation (p < 0.05). Thus within limitations of this study it was concluded that the condyle/fossa relation established during jaw relation does not change with the change in posterior tooth form used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mandibular condyle; Posterior tooth forms; Temporomandibular joint anatomy

Year:  2013        PMID: 24431715      PMCID: PMC3634947          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0260-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  12 in total

1.  Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography.

Authors:  Kaoru Kobayashi; Shinji Shimoda; Yoichi Nakagawa; Akira Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  What you can and cannot see in TMJ imaging--an overview related to the RDC/TMD diagnostic system.

Authors:  A Petersson
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.837

3.  An experimental study of the testing of occlusal patterns on the same denture bases. 1952.

Authors:  Vincent R Trapozzano; John B Lazzari
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 4.  Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique.

Authors:  S F Dworkin; L LeResche
Journal:  J Craniomandib Disord       Date:  1992

5.  Some phases of our many-sided denture problem.

Authors:  C H BLANCHARD
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  A tomographic study of the temporomandibular joint of edentulous patients.

Authors:  C G Hatjigiorgis; R J Grisius; R K Fenster; P A Neff
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Optimum TMJ condyle position in clinical practice.

Authors:  P E Dawson
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Influence of tooth contact on the path of condylar movements.

Authors:  M M Alsawaf; D A Garlapo
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Edentulous position of the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  L Hongchen; Z Jilin; L Ning
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Pantographic evaluation of cephalometric hinge axis.

Authors:  R E Brewka
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1981-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.