Literature DB >> 24431653

Trends in the occurrence of antenatal and perinatal complications with increasing parity.

Pooja R Vaswani1, Sangeeta Sabharwal1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In modern days, grand multiparity is confined to communities where contraception is not practiced because of social and religious beliefs. For this reason, it is quite prevalent in all GCC countries. Few studies have compared the outcomes between the three groups: low parity (2-4), grand multiparity (5-9), and great grand multiparity (10 and more) . This study intended to analyze the trends in the occurrence of various perinatal complications across these three groups.
METHODS: This historical cohort study was conducted in Mafraq Hospital, Abu Dhabi between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011. There were 1,658 multipara, 1,198 grand multipara, and 160 great grand multipara.
RESULTS: Different complications revealed different trends with increasing parity. Many antenatal and intrapartum complications like diabetes (overt and gestational), anemia, preterm delivery, malpresentation at term, postpartum hemorrhage, and macrosomia showed a linear increase with increasing parity, while some, like the need for labor augmentation and soft tissue injuries showed a declining trend with increasing parity. Interestingly, some complications like placenta praevia, need for induction of labor, cesarean delivery, and post-term delivery followed an inverted V curve, showing an increase in their occurrence up to parity nine but a decline thereafter with further increasing parity of ten or beyond.
CONCLUSION: Women in different parity groups were at risk of different complications. There are some complications which decrease with increasing parity, and perinatal mortality remains very low suggesting that in modern settings, with favorable socioeconomic conditions and access to high-quality healthcare, a satisfactory perinatal outcome can be expected with low morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antenatal; Grand multiparity; Perinatal complications

Year:  2013        PMID: 24431653      PMCID: PMC3763060          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-012-0344-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  11 in total

1.  Grandmultiparae in a modern setting.

Authors:  G J Bugg; G S Atwal; M Maresh
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 2.  The clinical outcome in pregnancies of grand grand multiparous women.

Authors:  K Juntunen; P Kirkinen; A Kauppila
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Effect of grand multiparity on intrapartum and newborn complications in young women.

Authors:  Sara M Ellis Simonsen; Joseph L Lyon; Stephen C Alder; Michael W Varner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Obstetric outcome in grand multipara in the United Arab Emirates. A case control study.

Authors:  D E Rizk; M Khalfan; M Ezimokhai
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  The problem of grandmultiparity in current obstetric practice.

Authors:  F T Mwambingu; A A Al Meshari; A Akiel
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  The "grand multipara"--is it a problem? A review of 5785 cases.

Authors:  K Fuchs; B A Peretz; R Marcovici; E Paldi; I Timor-Tritsh
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  The grand multipara in modern obstetrics.

Authors:  G R Evaldson
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in grand multiparity.

Authors:  Horace Roman; Pierre-Yves Robillard; Eric Verspyck; Thomas C Hulsey; Loïc Marpeau; Georges Barau
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The "dangerous multipara": fact or fiction?

Authors:  J S Toohey; K A Keegan; M A Morgan; J Francis; S Task; M deVeciana
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The labor curve of the grand multipara: does progress of labor continue to improve with additional childbearing?

Authors:  Edith D Gurewitsch; Paul Diament; Jill Fong; Guan-hua Huang; Aron Popovtzer; Daniel Weinstein; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  4 in total

1.  Grand multiparity and the possible risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: a dilemma to be deciphered.

Authors:  Ghadeer K Al-Shaikh; Gehan H Ibrahim; Amel A Fayed; Hazem Al-Mandeel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  The Prevalence, the Fetal and Maternal Outcomes in Grand Multiparas Women.

Authors:  Maha Hussain Alhainiah; Hasan S O Abdulljabbar; Yasir Ahmad Bukhari
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2018-06

3.  Effect of Grand Multiparity on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Under 35 Years of Age: a Comparative Study.

Authors:  Mohamed Alkhatim Alsammani; Athar Mohieldin Jafer; Sumeya A Khieri; Ali Osman Ali; Mohamed Abdelgadir Shaaeldin
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2019-04

4.  Differential effect of pre-pregnancy low BMI on fetal macrosomia: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Guoju Li; Yuhan Xing; Guolan Wang; Jun Zhang; Qin Wu; Wei Ni; Na Jiao; Wenjing Chen; Qing Liu; Li Gao; Zhenhong Zhang; Yao Wang; Quansheng Xing
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 8.775

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.