Literature DB >> 24431293

Quality indicators of laryngeal cancer care in the elderly.

Christine G Gourin1, Kevin D Frick, Amanda L Blackford, Robert J Herbert, Harry Quon, Arlene A Forastiere, David W Eisele, Sydney M Dy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To examine associations between quality of care, survival, and costs in elderly patients treated for laryngeal squamous cell cancer (SCCA). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare data.
METHODS: We evaluated 2,370 patients diagnosed with laryngeal SCCA from 2004 to 2007 using multivariate regression and survival analysis. Using quality indicators derived from guidelines for recommended care, summary measures of quality were calculated for diagnosis, initial treatment, surveillance, treatment of recurrence, end-of-life care, performance, and an overall summary measure of quality.
RESULTS: High-quality care was associated with significant differences in survival for diagnosis [HR = 0.80, 95% CI (0.66-0.97)], initial treatment [HR = 0.75 (0.63-0.88)], surveillance [HR = 0.54 (0.44-0.66)], treatment of recurrence [HR = 1.54 (1.26-1.89)], end-of-life care [HR = 0.69 (0.52-0.92)], performance [HR = 0.41 (0.33-0.52)], and an overall summary measure of quality [HR = 0.66 (0.54-0.80)], which was significantly associated with lower mean incremental costs [-$24,958 (-$35,873 - -$14,042)]. There was a significant survival advantage for initial treatment with surgery and postoperative radiation [HR = 0.66 (0.53-0.82)] and high-volume surgical care [HR = 0.64 (0.43-0.96)] after controlling for all other variables, including quality of care.
CONCLUSIONS: High-quality larynx cancer care in elderly patients was associated with improved survival and reduced costs; however, high-quality care for treatment of recurrence was associated with poorer survival. These data suggest that survival outcomes in elderly patients with laryngeal cancer are not entirely explained by differences in the receipt of quality care using existing treatment and performance quality indicators and also suggest a need to develop sensitive and valid quality indicators of larynx cancer care in this population.
© 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laryngeal neoplasms; SEER-Medicare; chemotherapy; costs; elderly; quality; radiation; squamous cell cancer; surgery; survival; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24431293     DOI: 10.1002/lary.24593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of Quality Metrics for Surgically Treated Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Evan M Graboyes; Melanie E Townsend; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Brian Nussenbaum
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Association of Compliance With Process-Related Quality Metrics and Improved Survival in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Evan M Graboyes; Jennifer Gross; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Maha Al-Gilani; Michael E Stadler; Brian Nussenbaum
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Association of Hospital Volume With Laryngectomy Outcomes in Patients With Larynx Cancer.

Authors:  Christine G Gourin; C Matthew Stewart; Kevin D Frick; Carole Fakhry; Karen T Pitman; David W Eisele; J Matthew Austin
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Making the Best of Limited Resources: Improving Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Johannes J Fagan; Vanita Noronha; Evan Michael Graboyes
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2021-03

5.  Does Quality of Care Matter? A Study of Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Molena; Benedetto Mungo; Miloslawa Stem; Amy K Poupore; Sophia Y Chen; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Understanding Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Peter M Vila; John S Schneider; Jay F Piccirillo; Judith E C Lieu
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 7.  Performance Improvement in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Carol M Lewis; Randal S Weber
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Contemporary management of advanced laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher J Britt; Christine G Gourin
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.