| Literature DB >> 24430351 |
Z R Liu1, H Zhang2, J Q Wu2, J J Zhou2, Y H Ji3.
Abstract
Although modulation of the activity of voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) by protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylation has been investigated in multiple preparations, the pharmacological sensitivity of VGSCs to scorpion toxins after PKA phosphorylation has rarely been approached. In this study, the effects of BmK AS, a sodium channel-specific modulator from Chinese scorpion Buthus martensi Karsch, on the voltage-dependent activation and inactivation of Nav1.2 were examined before and after PKA activation. After PKA phosphorylation, the pattern of dose-dependent modulation of BmK AS, on both Nav1.2α and Nav1.2 (α + β1) was reshaped. Meanwhile, the shifts in voltage-dependency of activation and inactivation induced by BmK AS were attenuated. The results suggested that PKA might play a role in different patterns how β-like toxins such as BmK AS modulate gating properties and peak currents of VGSCs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24430351 PMCID: PMC5379197 DOI: 10.1038/srep03721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Time course of peak sodium current amplitude during PKA activation.
Peak sodium current amplitudes recorded from control (Open square), pre-administration of Iso (Open circle) and pre-administration of 500 nM BmK AS (Open triangle) are shown during 50-min time course.
Figure 2BmK AS modulation of the sodium channel before and after PKA activation.
(A–C), Representative sodium current traces after treatment of 1 nM,10 nM or 100 nM BmK AS (Black). (D). 3-D diagram illustrates the inhibition rate of BmK AS on Nav1.2α before and after PKA activation.
Figure 3Voltage dependence of activation and inactivation for Nav1.2 sodium channels.
The voltage-dependence of activation and inactivation are shown for α subunits alone (Left pannel) and (α + β1) subunits (Right pannel).
Figure 4Kinetics for voltaged dependent activation and inactivation for Nav1.2 sodium channels.
Parameters for voltage-dependence of activation and inactivation of Nav1.2α expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes.
| BmK AS | Administration | Activation | Steady-state inactivation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration | V1/2 (mV) | N | V1/2 (mV) | N | |||
| 1 nM | Control | −32.15 ± 0.48 | 3.12 ± 0.45 | 49 | −51.23 ± 0.79 | 8.49 ± 0.71 | 25 |
| Pre AS | −32.57 ± 0.85 | 3.61 ± 0.72 | 5 | −54.46 ± 1.03 | 11.65 ± 0.97 | 7 | |
| Pro Iso | −34.19 ± 0.75 | 3.39 ± 0.49 | 5 | −54.73 ± 1.30 | 12.39 ± 1.24 | 6 | |
| Pre Iso | −33.03 ± 0.67 | 3.25 ± 0.51 | 29 | −53.03 ± 1.06 | 9.93 ± 0.96 | 36 | |
| Pro AS | −35.46 ± 0.94 | 2.78 ± 0.51 | 7 | −52.58 ± 1.61 | 12.04 ± 1.54 | 8 | |
| 10 nM | Pre AS | −27.26 ± 0.86 | 3.78 ± ± 0.71 | 8 | −53.16 ± 0.85 | 7.38 ± 0.74 | 7 |
| Pro Iso | −28.10 ± 0.78 | 4.56 ± 0.71 | 8 | −54.44 ± 0.86 | 7.48 ± 0.86 | 8 | |
| Pre Iso | −33.03 ± 0.67 | 3.25 ± 0.51 | 29 | −53.03 ± 1.06 | 9.93 ± 0.96 | 36 | |
| Pro AS | −34.02 ± 0.91 | 4.01 ± 0.68 | 11 | −56.53 ± 1.49 | 10.61 ± 1.37 | 10 | |
| 100 nM | Pre AS | −37.69 ± 1.09 | 3.26 ± 0.99 | 8 | −51.72 ± 0.59 | 8.24 ± 0.52 | 10 |
| Pro Iso | −32.16 ± 0.57 | 3.09 ± 0.54 | 7 | −51.07 ± 0.57 | 8.87 ± 0.51 | 10 | |
| Pre Iso | −33.03 ± 0.67 | 3.25 ± 0.51 | 29 | −53.03 ± 1.06 | 9.93 ± 0.96 | 36 | |
| Pro AS | −33.53 ± 1.01 | 4.21 ± 0.80 | 7 | −51.10 ± 0.71 | 9.48 ± 0.64 | 9 | |
1Kinetic parameters of Nav1.2α after applying with BmK AS of different concentrations (1, 10 and 100 nM) were listed as Mean ± SEM separately.
2All the concentrations of BmK AS were applied before (Pre AS) and after (Pro AS) PKA activation through perfusion with 100 μM Iso.
3N indicates the number of samples tested.
*, ** and *** indicates significant difference between control and BmK AS or Iso treated oocytes (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; t-test).
Parameters for voltage-dependence of activation and inactivation of Nav1.2 (α + β1) expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes
| BmK AS | Administration | Activation | Steady-state inactivation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration | V1/2 (mV) | N | V1/2 (mV) | N | |||
| 1 nM | Control (Pre AS) | −28.66 ± 0.52 | 2.91 ± 0.34 | 5 | −53.10 ± 0.42 | 5.82 ± 0.21 | 6 |
| Pre AS | −26.61 ± 0.42 | 2.89 ± 0.65 | 6 | −53.46 ± 0.41 | 5.80 ± 0.24 | 6 | |
| Pro Iso | −26.11 ± 0.37 | 2.84 ± 0.32 | 6 | −53.12 ± 0.55 | 6.14 ± 0.28 | 6 | |
| Control (Pro AS) | −26.65 ± 0.79 | 4.645 ± 0.29 | 6 | −53.25 ± 0.35 | 5.51 ± 0.18 | 6 | |
| Pre Iso | −25.40 ± 2.16 | 4.14 ± 0.67 | 6 | −53.66 ± 0.57 | 5.85 ± 0.32 | 6 | |
| Pro AS | −24.56 ± 0.82 | 4.53 ± 0.25 | 5 | −54.72 ± 0.51 | 6.61 ± 0.34 | 6 | |
| 10 nM | Control (Pre AS) | −28.94 ± 1.05 | 3.07 ± 0.55 | 5 | −54.33 ± 0.43 | 5.22 ± 0.51 | 7 |
| Pre AS | −22.91 ± 0.82 | 3.70 ± 0.90 | 6 | −57.36 ± 0.31 | 5.90 ± 0.15 | 5 | |
| Pro Iso | −22.38 ± 0.78 | 3.41 ± 2.00 | 4 | −53.75 ± 0.24 | 5.79 ± 0.12 | 4 | |
| Control (Pro AS) | −29.15 ± 1.35 | 2.61 ± 0.49 | 8 | −52.53 ± 0.43 | 5.14 ± 0.23 | 8 | |
| Pre Iso | −29.29 ± 0.87 | 3.34 ± 0.32 | 7 | −52.10 ± 0.46 | 6.05 ± 0.28 | 6 | |
| Pro AS | −24.81 ± 1.31 | 4.28 ± 0.45 | 8 | −53.55 ± 0.36 | 6.13 ± 0.34 | 8 | |
| 100 nM | Control (Pre AS) | −29.68 ± 0.58 | 4.45 ± 0.61 | 6 | −52.87 ± 0.11 | 6.12 ± 0.13 | |
| Pre AS | −23.25 ± 0.12 | 3.78 ± 0.10 | 6 | −56.91 ± 0.09 | 7.01 ± 0.06 | 6 | |
| Pro Iso | −19.49 ± 0.32 | 5.03 ± 0.28 | 6 | −54.84 ± 0.12 | 6.04 ± 0.10 | 6 | |
| Control (Pro AS) | −29.11 ± 3.50 | 2.40 ± 1.21 | 5 | −54.20 ± 0.36 | 6.23 ± 2.09 | 7 | |
| Pre Iso | −28.57 ± 1.80 | 2.60 ± 0.59 | 4 | −54.62 ± 0.45 | 5.79 ± 0.29 | 7 | |
| Pro AS | −26.17 ± 0.41 | 3.35 ± 0.14 | 4 | −54.55 ± 0.42 | 6.24 ± 0.36 | 5 | |
1Kinetic parameters of Nav1.2 (α + β1) after applying with BmK AS of different concentrations (1, 10 and 100 nM) were listed as Mean ± SEM separately.
2All the concentrations of BmK AS were applied before (Pre AS) and after (Pro AS) PKA activation through perfusion with 100 μM Iso.
3N indicates the number of samples tested.
*, ** and *** indicates significant difference between control and BmK AS or Iso treated oocytes (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; t-test).
Figure 5Modulation of BmK AS on the inactivation kinetics of phosphorylated/non-phophorylated Nav1.2.
(A–C) Inactivation time constants and fraction of fast component modulated by BmK AS of each concentration (1, 10 and 100 nM).
Figure 6The fractions of residual sodium current after depolarization to −20 mV for 10 ms in Xenopus oocytes, before (A) and after PKA phosphorylation (B)*P < 0.05; indicating significant difference between the control (white bar) and BmK AS (Dark bar) values.