Courtney J Balentine1, Aanand D Naik2, Celia N Robinson3, Nancy J Petersen4, G John Chen5, David H Berger1, Daniel A Anaya1. 1. Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Houston, Texas2Operative Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas3Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surg. 2. Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Houston, Texas4Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas5Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylo. 3. Operative Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas. 4. Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Houston, Texas. 5. Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Houston, Texas4Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Discharge disposition is a patient-centered quality metric that reflects differences in quality of life and recovery following surgery. The effect of hospital volume on quality of recovery measured by rates of successful discharge to home remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that patients having colorectal surgery at high-volume hospitals would more likely be discharged to home rather than discharged to skilled rehabilitation facilities to complete recovery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal analysis of 2008 hospital inpatient data to identify patients undergoing colorectal surgery who survived to discharge. The setting was the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest all-payer inpatient care database, containing data from more than 1000 hospitals. Participants were 280,644 patients (≥ 18 years) who underwent colorectal resections for benign or malignant disease and survived to discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was discharge to home (with or without home health care) vs discharge to skilled facilities (skilled nursing, short-term recovery, or rehabilitation hospitals or other institutions). The secondary end point was discharge to home with home health care rather than to a skilled facility for patients with postdischarge care needs. Multiple logistic regression using robust standard errors was used to compute the odds ratios of each outcome based on hospital volume, while adjusting for other important variables. RESULTS: The odds of discharge to home vs discharge to skilled facilities were significantly greater in high-volume hospitals compared with low-volume hospitals (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.70-2.56), with an absolute increase of 9%. For patients with postdischarge care needs, high-volume hospitals were less likely than low-volume hospitals to use skilled facilities rather than home health care (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.27-0.45), with an absolute difference of 10%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients having colorectal surgery at high-volume hospitals are significantly more likely to recover and return home after surgery than individuals having operations at low-volume hospitals. This study is the first step in a process of identifying which features of high-volume hospitals contribute toward desirable outcomes. Efforts to identify the reasons for improved recovery at high-volume hospitals can help lower-volume hospitals adopt beneficial practices.
IMPORTANCE: Discharge disposition is a patient-centered quality metric that reflects differences in quality of life and recovery following surgery. The effect of hospital volume on quality of recovery measured by rates of successful discharge to home remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that patients having colorectal surgery at high-volume hospitals would more likely be discharged to home rather than discharged to skilled rehabilitation facilities to complete recovery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal analysis of 2008 hospital inpatient data to identify patients undergoing colorectal surgery who survived to discharge. The setting was the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest all-payer inpatient care database, containing data from more than 1000 hospitals. Participants were 280,644 patients (≥ 18 years) who underwent colorectal resections for benign or malignant disease and survived to discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was discharge to home (with or without home health care) vs discharge to skilled facilities (skilled nursing, short-term recovery, or rehabilitation hospitals or other institutions). The secondary end point was discharge to home with home health care rather than to a skilled facility for patients with postdischarge care needs. Multiple logistic regression using robust standard errors was used to compute the odds ratios of each outcome based on hospital volume, while adjusting for other important variables. RESULTS: The odds of discharge to home vs discharge to skilled facilities were significantly greater in high-volume hospitals compared with low-volume hospitals (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.70-2.56), with an absolute increase of 9%. For patients with postdischarge care needs, high-volume hospitals were less likely than low-volume hospitals to use skilled facilities rather than home health care (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.27-0.45), with an absolute difference of 10%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients having colorectal surgery at high-volume hospitals are significantly more likely to recover and return home after surgery than individuals having operations at low-volume hospitals. This study is the first step in a process of identifying which features of high-volume hospitals contribute toward desirable outcomes. Efforts to identify the reasons for improved recovery at high-volume hospitals can help lower-volume hospitals adopt beneficial practices.
Authors: Courtney J Balentine; Kelly Kenzik; Daniel I Chu; Melanie S Morris; Sara J Knight; Cynthia J Brown; Smita Bhatia Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Tomi F Akinyemiju; Gurudatta Naik; Kemi Ogunsina; Daniel T Dibaba; Neomi Vin-Raviv Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Courtney J Balentine; Melanie Morris; Sara J Knight; Janet M Turan; Kellie L Flood; Diana Gutierrez-Meza; Cameron L Macdonald; Smita Bhatia; Cynthia J Brown Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Alisha Lussiez; John R Montgomery; Naveen F Sangji; Zhaohui Fan; Bryant W Oliphant; Mark R Hemmila; Justin B Dimick; John W Scott Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 3.697