Literature DB >> 24429672

Biosafety assessment of GFP transplastomic tobacco to rhizosphere microbial community.

Yueping Lv1, Hongsheng Cai, Jianping Yu, Jiali Liu, Qingguo Liu, Changhong Guo.   

Abstract

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) is one of the most widely studied and exploited proteins in biochemistry, and has many applications as a marker, especially in plant transformation system. Although a number of studies have been conducted to assess the toxify of this protein to specific organisms, little is known about GFP on rhizosphere microbial community, which is regarded as good indicator for environmental risk assessment. Chloroplast genetic engineering has shown superiority over traditional nuclear genetic engineering, and has been used in many aspects of plant genetic engineering. High levels of chloroplast-based protein accumulation make this technology as an ideal strategy to evaluate biosafety of transgenes. In the present study, the effects of field-released GFP transplastomic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) on rhizosphere microbes over a whole growth cycle were investigated by using both culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Compared to wild-type control, transplastomic tobacco had no significant influence on the microbial population at the seedling, vegetative, flowering and senescing stages. However, developmental stages had more influence than ecotypes (GFP-transformed and wild-type). This was confirmed by colony forming unit, Biolog Eco(TM) and PCR-DGGE analysis. Thus, these results suggest chloroplast transformation with a GFP reporter gene has no significant influence on rhizosphere microbial community, and will be potential platform for plant biotechnology in future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24429672     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-014-1185-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  32 in total

Review 1.  Milestones in chloroplast genetic engineering: an environmentally friendly era in biotechnology.

Authors:  Henry Daniell; Muhammad S Khan; Lori Allison
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  Seasonal changes in the rhizosphere microbial communities associated with field-grown genetically modified canola (Brassica napus).

Authors:  Kari E Dunfield; James J Germida
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Plastid transformation in higher plants.

Authors:  Pal Maliga
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 4.  Perspectives for genetic engineering of poplars for enhanced phytoremediation abilities.

Authors:  Rakesh Yadav; Pooja Arora; Sandeep Kumar; Ashok Chaudhury
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Genetically modified crops deserve greater ecotoxicological scrutiny.

Authors:  Nicolas Desneux; Julio S Bernal
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Transgenic tobacco revealing altered bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere during early plant development.

Authors:  Fernando D Andreote; Rodrigo Mendes; Francisco Dini-Andreote; Priscilla B Rossetto; Carlos A Labate; Aline A Pizzirani-Kleiner; Jan Dirck van Elsas; João L Azevedo; Welington L Araújo
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 2.271

7.  Effects of rhizodeposition of non-transgenic and transplastomic tobaccos on the soil bacterial community.

Authors:  Lorenzo Brusetti; Aurora Rizzi; Alessandro Abruzzese; Gian Attilio Sacchi; Enzio Ragg; Marco Bazzicalupo; Claudia Sorlini; Daniele Daffonchio
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2008-04-03

8.  Antibiotic-resistant soil bacteria in transgenic plant fields.

Authors:  Sandrine Demanèche; Hervé Sanguin; John Poté; Elisabeth Navarro; Dominique Bernillon; Patrick Mavingui; Walter Wildi; Timothy M Vogel; Pascal Simonet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Phytoremediation of organomercurial compounds via chloroplast genetic engineering.

Authors:  Oscar N Ruiz; Hussein S Hussein; Norman Terry; Henry Daniell
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 10.  Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants: a case of the science not supporting the politics.

Authors:  Koreen Ramessar; Ariadna Peremarti; Sonia Gómez-Galera; Shaista Naqvi; Marian Moralejo; Pilar Muñoz; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.145

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cry1Ac Transgenic Sugarcane Does Not Affect the Diversity of Microbial Communities and Has No Significant Effect on Enzyme Activities in Rhizosphere Soil within One Crop Season.

Authors:  Dinggang Zhou; Liping Xu; Shiwu Gao; Jinlong Guo; Jun Luo; Qian You; Youxiong Que
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 5.753

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.