Literature DB >> 24429523

Rate of tree carbon accumulation increases continuously with tree size.

N L Stephenson1, A J Das1, R Condit2, S E Russo3, P J Baker4, N G Beckman5, D A Coomes6, E R Lines7, W K Morris8, N Rüger9, E Alvarez10, C Blundo11, S Bunyavejchewin12, G Chuyong13, S J Davies14, A Duque15, C N Ewango16, O Flores17, J F Franklin18, H R Grau11, Z Hao19, M E Harmon20, S P Hubbell21, D Kenfack14, Y Lin22, J-R Makana16, A Malizia11, L R Malizia23, R J Pabst20, N Pongpattananurak24, S-H Su25, I-F Sun26, S Tan27, D Thomas28, P J van Mantgem29, X Wang19, S K Wiser30, M A Zavala31.   

Abstract

Forests are major components of the global carbon cycle, providing substantial feedback to atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Our ability to understand and predict changes in the forest carbon cycle--particularly net primary productivity and carbon storage--increasingly relies on models that represent biological processes across several scales of biological organization, from tree leaves to forest stands. Yet, despite advances in our understanding of productivity at the scales of leaves and stands, no consensus exists about the nature of productivity at the scale of the individual tree, in part because we lack a broad empirical assessment of whether rates of absolute tree mass growth (and thus carbon accumulation) decrease, remain constant, or increase as trees increase in size and age. Here we present a global analysis of 403 tropical and temperate tree species, showing that for most species mass growth rate increases continuously with tree size. Thus, large, old trees do not act simply as senescent carbon reservoirs but actively fix large amounts of carbon compared to smaller trees; at the extreme, a single big tree can add the same amount of carbon to the forest within a year as is contained in an entire mid-sized tree. The apparent paradoxes of individual tree growth increasing with tree size despite declining leaf-level and stand-level productivity can be explained, respectively, by increases in a tree's total leaf area that outpace declines in productivity per unit of leaf area and, among other factors, age-related reductions in population density. Our results resolve conflicting assumptions about the nature of tree growth, inform efforts to undertand and model forest carbon dynamics, and have additional implications for theories of resource allocation and plant senescence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24429523     DOI: 10.1038/nature12914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  19 in total

Review 1.  Plant allometry: is there a grand unifying theory?

Authors:  Karl J Niklas
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2004-11

2.  The importance of demographic niches to tree diversity.

Authors:  Richard Condit; Peter Ashton; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; H S Dattaraja; Stuart Davies; Shameema Esufali; Corneille Ewango; Robin Foster; I A U N Gunatilleke; C V S Gunatilleke; Pamela Hall; Kyle E Harms; Terese Hart; Consuelo Hernandez; Stephen Hubbell; Akira Itoh; Somboon Kiratiprayoon; James Lafrankie; Suzanne Loo de Lao; Jean-Remy Makana; Md Nur Supardi Noor; Abdul Rahman Kassim; Sabrina Russo; Raman Sukumar; Cristián Samper; Hebbalalu S Suresh; Sylvester Tan; Sean Thomas; Renato Valencia; Martha Vallejo; Gorky Villa; Tommaso Zillio
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Neighborhood analyses of canopy tree competition along environmental gradients in New England forests.

Authors:  Charles D Canham; Michael J Papaik; María Uriarte; William H McWilliams; Jennifer C Jenkins; Mark J Twery
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation.

Authors:  Karl J Niklas; Brian J Enquist
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Size-mediated ageing reduces vigour in trees.

Authors:  M Mencuccini; J Martínez-Vilalta; D Vanderklein; H A Hamid; E Korakaki; S Lee; B Michiels
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.

Authors:  Yude Pan; Richard A Birdsey; Jingyun Fang; Richard Houghton; Pekka E Kauppi; Werner A Kurz; Oliver L Phillips; Anatoly Shvidenko; Simon L Lewis; Josep G Canadell; Philippe Ciais; Robert B Jackson; Stephen W Pacala; A David McGuire; Shilong Piao; Aapo Rautiainen; Stephen Sitch; Daniel Hayes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Ecology. Global decline in large old trees.

Authors:  David B Lindenmayer; William F Laurance; Jerry F Franklin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  No evidence of carbon limitation with tree age and height in Nothofagus pumilio under Mediterranean and temperate climate conditions.

Authors:  Frida I Piper; Alex Fajardo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 9.  Capacity of old trees to respond to environmental change.

Authors:  Nathan G Phillips; Thomas N Buckley; David T Tissue
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.061

10.  Growth strategies of tropical tree species: disentangling light and size effects.

Authors:  Nadja Rüger; Uta Berger; Stephen P Hubbell; Ghislain Vieilledent; Richard Condit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  55 in total

1.  Dispersal limitation induces long-term biomass collapse in overhunted Amazonian forests.

Authors:  Carlos A Peres; Thaise Emilio; Juliana Schietti; Sylvain J M Desmoulière; Taal Levi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Carbon limitation, stem growth rate and the biomechanical cause of Corner's rules.

Authors:  Mark E Olson; Julieta A Rosell; Salvador Zamora Muñoz; Matiss Castorena
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Twentieth-century shifts in forest structure in California: Denser forests, smaller trees, and increased dominance of oaks.

Authors:  Patrick J McIntyre; James H Thorne; Christopher R Dolanc; Alan L Flint; Lorraine E Flint; Maggi Kelly; David D Ackerly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How functional traits influence plant growth and shade tolerance across the life cycle.

Authors:  Daniel S Falster; Remko A Duursma; Richard G FitzJohn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Tree species richness increases ecosystem carbon storage in subtropical forests.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Liu; Stefan Trogisch; Jin-Sheng He; Pascal A Niklaus; Helge Bruelheide; Zhiyao Tang; Alexandra Erfmeier; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Katherina A Pietsch; Bo Yang; Peter Kühn; Thomas Scholten; Yuanyuan Huang; Chao Wang; Michael Staab; Katrin N Leppert; Christian Wirth; Bernhard Schmid; Keping Ma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Convergence of terrestrial plant production across global climate gradients.

Authors:  Sean T Michaletz; Dongliang Cheng; Andrew J Kerkhoff; Brian J Enquist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  A tree-ring perspective on the terrestrial carbon cycle.

Authors:  Flurin Babst; M Ross Alexander; Paul Szejner; Olivier Bouriaud; Stefan Klesse; John Roden; Philippe Ciais; Benjamin Poulter; David Frank; David J P Moore; Valerie Trouet
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Senescence is not inevitable.

Authors:  Owen R Jones; James W Vaupel
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.277

9.  Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.

Authors:  Rose A Graves; Ryan D Haugo; Andrés Holz; Max Nielsen-Pincus; Aaron Jones; Bryce Kellogg; Cathy Macdonald; Kenneth Popper; Michael Schindel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mapping tree density at a global scale.

Authors:  T W Crowther; H B Glick; K R Covey; C Bettigole; D S Maynard; S M Thomas; J R Smith; G Hintler; M C Duguid; G Amatulli; M-N Tuanmu; W Jetz; C Salas; C Stam; D Piotto; R Tavani; S Green; G Bruce; S J Williams; S K Wiser; M O Huber; G M Hengeveld; G-J Nabuurs; E Tikhonova; P Borchardt; C-F Li; L W Powrie; M Fischer; A Hemp; J Homeier; P Cho; A C Vibrans; P M Umunay; S L Piao; C W Rowe; M S Ashton; P R Crane; M A Bradford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.