Literature DB >> 24429508

Validating continuous digital light processing (cDLP) additive manufacturing accuracy and tissue engineering utility of a dye-initiator package.

Jonathan Wallace1, Martha O Wang, Paul Thompson, Mallory Busso, Vaijayantee Belle, Nicole Mammoser, Kyobum Kim, John P Fisher, Ali Siblani, Yueshuo Xu, Jean F Welter, Donald P Lennon, Jiayang Sun, Arnold I Caplan, David Dean.   

Abstract

This study tested the accuracy of tissue engineering scaffold rendering via the continuous digital light processing (cDLP) light-based additive manufacturing technology. High accuracy (i.e., <50 µm) allows the designed performance of features relevant to three scale spaces: cell-scaffold, scaffold-tissue, and tissue-organ interactions. The biodegradable polymer poly (propylene fumarate) was used to render highly accurate scaffolds through the use of a dye-initiator package, TiO2 and bis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phenylphosphine oxide. This dye-initiator package facilitates high accuracy in the Z dimension. Linear, round, and right-angle features were measured to gauge accuracy. Most features showed accuracies between 5.4-15% of the design. However, one feature, an 800 µm diameter circular pore, exhibited a 35.7% average reduction of patency. Light scattered in the x, y directions by the dye may have reduced this feature's accuracy. Our new fine-grained understanding of accuracy could be used to make further improvements by including corrections in the scaffold design software. Successful cell attachment occurred with both canine and human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Highly accurate cDLP scaffold rendering is critical to the design of scaffolds that both guide bone regeneration and that fully resorb. Scaffold resorption must occur for regenerated bone to be remodeled and, thereby, achieve optimal strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24429508     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/6/1/015003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  10 in total

Review 1.  The Recent Revolution in the Design and Manufacture of Cranial Implants: Modern Advancements and Future Directions.

Authors:  David J Bonda; Sunil Manjila; Warren R Selman; David Dean
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  The potential impact of bone tissue engineering in the clinic.

Authors:  Ruchi Mishra; Tyler Bishop; Ian L Valerio; John P Fisher; David Dean
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  Evaluating changes in structure and cytotoxicity during in vitro degradation of three-dimensional printed scaffolds.

Authors:  Martha O Wang; Charlotte M Piard; Anthony Melchiorri; Maureen L Dreher; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  3D printing in cell culture systems and medical applications.

Authors:  Max J Lerman; Josephine Lembong; Greg Gillen; John P Fisher
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 19.162

5.  Evaluating 3D-printed biomaterials as scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Martha O Wang; Charlotte E Vorwald; Maureen L Dreher; Eric J Mott; Ming-Huei Cheng; Ali Cinar; Hamidreza Mehdizadeh; Sami Somo; David Dean; Eric M Brey; John P Fisher
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 30.849

6.  Growth Factor Dose Tuning for Bone Progenitor Cell Proliferation and Differentiation on Resorbable Poly(propylene fumarate) Scaffolds.

Authors:  Ruchi Mishra; Ryan S Sefcik; Tyler J Bishop; Stefani M Montelone; Nisha Crouser; Jean F Welter; Arnold I Caplan; David Dean
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.056

7.  Digital micromirror device (DMD)-based 3D printing of poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds.

Authors:  Eric J Mott; Mallory Busso; Xinyi Luo; Courtney Dolder; Martha O Wang; John P Fisher; David Dean
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 7.328

8.  Three-Dimensional (3D) Printed Microneedles for Microencapsulated Cell Extrusion.

Authors:  Chantell Farias; Roman Lyman; Cecilia Hemingway; Huong Chau; Anne Mahacek; Evangelia Bouzos; Maryam Mobed-Miremadi
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-31

Review 9.  Design of Additively Manufactured Structures for Biomedical Applications: A Review of the Additive Manufacturing Processes Applied to the Biomedical Sector.

Authors:  Flaviana Calignano; Manuela Galati; Luca Iuliano; Paolo Minetola
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 10.  Polymer 3D Printing Review: Materials, Process, and Design Strategies for Medical Applications.

Authors:  Amit M E Arefin; Nava Raj Khatri; Nitin Kulkarni; Paul F Egan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.329

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.