Literature DB >> 24429327

State-of-the-art aortic imaging: Part II - applications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Fabian Rengier1, Philipp Geisbüsch2, Paul Schoenhagen3, Matthias Müller-Eschner1, Rolf Vosshenrich4, Christof Karmonik5, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk6, Sasan Partovi7.   

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as well as thoracic and abdominal endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR and EVAR) rely on accurate pre- and postprocedural imaging. This review article discusses the application of imaging, including preprocedural assessment and measurements as well as postprocedural imaging of complications. Furthermore, the exciting perspective of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based on cross-sectional imaging is presented. TAVR is a minimally invasive alternative for treatment of aortic valve stenosis in patients with high age and multiple comorbidities who cannot undergo traditional open surgical repair. Given the lack of direct visualization during the procedure, pre- and peri-procedural imaging forms an essential part of the intervention. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the imaging modality of choice for preprocedural planning. Routine postprocedural follow-up is performed by echocardiography to confirm treatment success and detect complications. EVAR and TEVAR are minimally invasive alternatives to open surgical repair of aortic pathologies. CTA constitutes the preferred imaging modality for both preoperative planning and postoperative follow-up including detection of endoleaks. Magnetic resonance imaging is an excellent alternative to CT for postoperative follow-up, and is especially beneficial for younger patients given the lack of radiation. Ultrasound is applied in screening and postoperative follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysms, but cross-sectional imaging is required once abnormalities are detected. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be as sensitive as CTA in detecting endoleaks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aorta; angiography; aortic diseases; computed tomography; imaging; magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24429327     DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasa        ISSN: 0301-1526            Impact factor:   1.961


  5 in total

1.  Diaphragm height varies with arm position: comparison between angiography and CT.

Authors:  Shiro Onozawa; Satoru Murata; Takayoshi Kimura; Tatsuo Ueda; Fumie Sugihara; Daisuke Yasui; Hiroyuki Tajima
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Multimodality imaging assessment of endoleaks post-endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Thomas Trischman; Vasileios Rafailidis; Suvranu Ganguli; Fabian Rengier; Harold Goerne; Prabhakar Rajiah; Daniel Staub; Indravadan J Patel; George Oliveira; Brian Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Clinical utility of quantitative imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Rathan M Subramaniam; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Prospective Study of Low-Radiation and Low-Iodine Dose Aortic CT Angiography in Obese and Non-Obese Patients: Image Quality and Impact of Patient Characteristics.

Authors:  Matthias A Fink; Sibylle Stoll; Claudius Melzig; Andrea Steuwe; Sasan Partovi; Dittmar Böckler; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Fabian Rengier
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10

Review 5.  [Diagnostics and treatment of traumatic aortic injuries].

Authors:  R M Benz; V Makaloski; M Brönnimann; N Mertineit; H von Tengg-Kobligk
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 1.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.