Literature DB >> 24427719

A clinical study of cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implantees.

Mohammod Delwar Hossain1, S Raghunandhan1, Mohan Kameswaran1, R Ranjith1.   

Abstract

Normal maturation of central auditory pathways is a precondition for the optimal development of speech and language skills in children. The temporal cortex gets acoustically tagged due to auditory stimulation and important changes occur in the higher auditory centers due to hearing loss of any type and degree. Cochlear implantation increases auditory sensitivity by direct electrical activation of auditory nerve fibers, enabling phonemic awareness, discrimination and identification ultimately yielding speech understanding. Early implantation stimulates a brain that has not been re-organized and will therefore be more receptive to auditory input and greater auditory capacity. Cortical potentials have enabled us to objectively study this phenomenon. To assess the outcomes of Cochlear implants on the auditory cortex by analyzing cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) in the habilitation period. This prospective clinical study was performed in 30 pre-lingual candidates with varied etiology of deafness who underwent cochlear implantation at our institute over the last 1 year. The study group had two cohorts (group-1: 0-8 years and group-2: 8-15 years) which included candidates with normal inner ear and no syndromes or handicaps. All implantees in the study group underwent CAEP testing at 6 months and 1 year post-implantation and comparison of the CAEP wave parameters (P1 amplitude, P1 latency and P1 morphology) were done between the two cohorts. In children Implanted early (group-1) there was an early onset rapid increase in P1 amplitude along with a decrease in P1 latency during the follow-up period. Significant change in the CAEP wave morphology was also notable in group-1 unlike in group-2. Candidates who experienced less than 3 years of auditory deprivation before implantation showed P1 latencies, which fell into the range of normal children within 6 months of habilitation. Children with more than 6 years of auditory deprivation, however, generally did not develop normal P1 latencies or morphology even after 1 year of habilitation. The overall outcome with CAEP was much better in group-1 as compared to group-2 and the observations were is in comparison with the existing world literature. The advent of CAEP has objectively proved beyond doubt that there is a critical age for stimulating the auditory brain via cochlear implantation. There is considerable evidence for a developmental sensitive period, during which the auditory cortex is highly plastic. If sensory input is deprived to the auditory system during this sensitive period, then the central auditory system is susceptible to large scale reorganization. Restoring input to the auditory system by Cochlear Implant at an early age can provide the stimulation necessary to preserve the auditory pathways. However, if auditory input is not restored until after this developmental period, then the cross-modal reorganized pathways may exhibits abnormal functional characteristics as observed in recorded P1 amplitude, latencies and morphologies of CAEPs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central auditory processing; Cochlear implants; Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs)

Year:  2012        PMID: 24427719      PMCID: PMC3889379          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-012-0563-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  11 in total

1.  Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Su-Wooi Teoh; Heidi Neuburger
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Developmental changes in refractoriness of the cortical auditory evoked potential.

Authors:  Phillip M Gilley; Anu Sharma; Michael Dorman; Kathryn Martin
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Kathryn Martin; Peter Roland; Paul Bauer; Melissa H Sweeney; Phillip Gilley; Michael Dorman
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Central auditory development in children with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Paul W Bauer; Anu Sharma; Kathryn Martin; Michael Dorman
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-10

Review 6.  Auditory-evoked potential studies of cortical maturation in normal hearing and implanted children: correlations with changes in structure and speech perception.

Authors:  Jos J Eggermont; Curtis W Ponton
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Central auditory development: evidence from CAEP measurements in children fit with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Anu Sharma; Phillip Gilley; Kathryn Martin; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Atypical cortical responses underlie poor speech perception in children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Karen A Gordon; Sho Tanaka; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 9.  Cochlear implants and brain plasticity.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Dexter R F Irvine; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Phillip M Gilley; Anu Sharma; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Developmental and cross-modal plasticity in deafness: evidence from the P1 and N1 event related potentials in cochlear implanted children.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Julia Campbell; Garrett Cardon
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  The Potential Use of P1 CAEP as a Biomarker for Assessing Central Auditory Pathway Maturation in Hearing loss and Associated Disabilities: a case report.

Authors:  Cristina Pantelemon; Violeta Necula; Livia Livint Popa; Steluta Palade; Stefan Strilciuc; Dafin Fior Muresanu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

3.  Neural Mechanisms of Hearing Recovery for Cochlear-Implanted Patients: An Electroencephalogram Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Songjian Wang; Meng Lin; Liwei Sun; Xueqing Chen; Xinxing Fu; LiLi Yan; Chunlin Li; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Cochlear Implantation Outcome in Children with DFNB1 locus Pathogenic Variants.

Authors:  Dominika Oziębło; Anita Obrycka; Artur Lorens; Henryk Skarżyński; Monika Ołdak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.