Literature DB >> 15721079

Developmental changes in refractoriness of the cortical auditory evoked potential.

Phillip M Gilley1, Anu Sharma, Michael Dorman, Kathryn Martin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined morphological changes in the cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) waveform as a function of varying stimulation rate. Stimuli were presented in a paradigm which indirectly assesses the refractory properties of the underlying neuronal generators.
METHODS: CAEPs were recorded in 50 normal-hearing children (3-12 years) and 10 young adults (24-26 years). A speech sound was presented in a stimulus train with sequentially decreasing inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) of 2000, 1000, 560, and 360ms. Latencies and amplitudes of the P1, N1, and P2 components at the Cz electrode were examined as a function of stimulus rate and age.
RESULTS: Results revealed significant changes in the CAEP as a function of age and stimulation rate. At younger ages the N1-P2 component was elicited only at the slowest stimulation rates, and was more clearly apparent at successively faster stimulation rates as age increased.
CONCLUSIONS: We have described a stimulus paradigm that allows examination of the development of refractoriness by highlighting the interaction between age and rate on CAEP morphology. SIGNIFICANCE: Complex maturational patterns of CAEP components are best understood when the effects of both age and stimulus rate on the CAEP waveform are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15721079     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  63 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity in the developing auditory cortex: evidence from children with sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Garrett Cardon; Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Assessing toddlers' speech-sound discrimination.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Kaylah Lalonde
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  The influence of a sensitive period for auditory-visual integration in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Phillip M Gilley; Anu Sharma; Teresa V Mitchell; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Auditory selective attention and processing in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Hilary Gomes; Martin Duff; Miguel Ramos; Sophie Molholm; John J Foxe; Jeffrey Halperin
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  P1 cortical auditory evoked potential in children with unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants; implication for the timing of second cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Sung Wook Jeong; Seung Hyun Chung; Lee-Suk Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Processing intensity at rapid rates: evidence from auditory evoked potentials in 9-11-year-old children.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dinces; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Genetic mapping of brain plasticity across development in Williams syndrome: ERP markers of face and language processing.

Authors:  D L Mills; L Dai; I Fishman; A Yam; L G Appelbaum; M St George; A Galaburda; U Bellugi; J R Korenberg
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Infant cortical electrophysiology and perception of vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Barbara K Cone
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  The maturation of human evoked brain potentials to sounds presented at different stimulus rates.

Authors:  E Sussman; M Steinschneider; V Gumenyuk; J Grushko; K Lawson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The representation of voice onset time in the cortical auditory evoked potentials of young children.

Authors:  Katrina Agung King; Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma; Kathryn Martin; Michael Dorman; Justin Langran
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.