Literature DB >> 24427001

Di-aqua-dichlorido-bis-(pyridine-κN)cobalt(II).

P S Kannan1, A S Ganeshraja2, K Anbalagan2, E Govindan3, A Subbiahpandi3.   

Abstract

The title mol-ecule, [CoCl2(C5H5N)2(H2O)2], has -1 symmetry with the Co(II) ion situated on an inversion centre. The cation has a distorted octa-hedral coordination environment and is surrounded by two N and two Cl atoms in the equatorial plane, while the coordinating water O atoms occupy the axial positions. The crystal exhibits nonmerohedral twinning with two domain states, the volume fractions of which were refined to 0.883 (2) and 0.117 (3). The crystal packing is stabilized by O-H⋯Cl hydrogen-bond inter-actions, forming two-dimensional networks lying parallel to (001). The crystal packing also features π-π inter-actions between the pyridine rings, with centroid-centroid separations of 3.493 (3) and 3.545 (3) Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24427001      PMCID: PMC3884431          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For biological activity and potential applications of mixed-ligand cobalt complexes, see: Arslan et al. (2009 ▶) (anti­microbial activity); Delehanty et al. (2008 ▶) (anti­viral activity); Sayed et al. (1992 ▶) (anti­tumor activity); Teicher et al. (1990 ▶) (anti­tumor and cytotoxic activities); Milaeva et al. (2013 ▶) (biochemical properties of CoII). For related structures, see: Li et al. (2009 ▶); Zhu & Zhou (2008 ▶). For graph-set motifs, see: Etter et al. (1990 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[CoCl2(C5H5N)2(H2O)2] M = 324.06 Triclinic, a = 6.2028 (2) Å b = 6.5971 (1) Å c = 8.5963 (2) Å α = 109.734 (2)° β = 102.621 (3)° γ = 97.031 (2)° V = 315.65 (1) Å3 Z = 1 Mo Kα radiation μ = 1.77 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.25 × 0.2 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.576, T max = 0.618 2211 measured reflections 2211 independent reflections 1926 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.047 wR(F 2) = 0.149 S = 1.16 2211 reflections 88 parameters 3 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.71 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.99 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶) and TwinRotMat (Bolte, 2004 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022484/fb2288sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022484/fb2288Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[CoCl2(C5H5N)2(H2O)2]Z = 1
Mr = 324.06F(000) = 165
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.705 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.2028 (2) ÅCell parameters from 2211 reflections
b = 6.5971 (1) Åθ = 2.6–26.7°
c = 8.5963 (2) ŵ = 1.77 mm1
α = 109.734 (2)°T = 293 K
β = 102.621 (3)°Block, pink
γ = 97.031 (2)°0.25 × 0.2 × 0.18 mm
V = 315.65 (1) Å3
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer2211 independent reflections
Radiation source: Fine-focus sealed tube, Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source1926 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.000
ω scansθmax = 26.7°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.576, Tmax = 0.618k = −8→8
2211 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.149H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.16w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0878P)2 + 0.6139P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2211 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
88 parametersΔρmax = 0.71 e Å3
3 restraintsΔρmin = −0.99 e Å3
22 constraints
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.2308 (7)0.2281 (6)0.3845 (5)0.0301 (9)
H10.35930.22700.34530.036*
C20.2576 (7)0.3179 (7)0.5588 (5)0.0374 (10)
H20.40120.37920.63520.045*
C30.0695 (8)0.3160 (7)0.6187 (5)0.0380 (10)
H30.08340.37490.73610.046*
C4−0.1391 (7)0.2252 (7)0.5014 (5)0.0339 (9)
H4−0.26900.22000.53860.041*
C5−0.1549 (7)0.1418 (7)0.3281 (5)0.0297 (8)
H5−0.29750.08320.24990.036*
N10.0267 (5)0.1418 (5)0.2680 (4)0.0247 (7)
O10.2699 (4)0.2637 (4)0.0415 (4)0.0299 (7)
H1A0.264 (8)0.388 (4)0.045 (6)0.045*
H1B0.365 (6)0.210 (6)0.000 (6)0.045*
Cl1−0.27270 (14)0.23327 (14)−0.06014 (12)0.0295 (3)
Co10.00000.00000.00000.0209 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.028 (2)0.028 (2)0.029 (2)0.0014 (16)0.0024 (16)0.0087 (17)
C20.040 (2)0.029 (2)0.031 (2)0.0004 (18)−0.0014 (19)0.0059 (18)
C30.063 (3)0.026 (2)0.025 (2)0.013 (2)0.014 (2)0.0074 (18)
C40.046 (3)0.030 (2)0.034 (2)0.0138 (18)0.0216 (19)0.0147 (19)
C50.029 (2)0.027 (2)0.030 (2)0.0039 (16)0.0112 (16)0.0053 (17)
N10.0250 (16)0.0209 (15)0.0256 (16)0.0024 (12)0.0082 (13)0.0057 (13)
O10.0244 (15)0.0231 (14)0.0428 (17)0.0016 (11)0.0134 (13)0.0117 (14)
Cl10.0237 (5)0.0240 (5)0.0383 (6)0.0052 (4)0.0082 (4)0.0089 (4)
Co10.0170 (3)0.0183 (4)0.0228 (4)−0.0001 (2)0.0053 (3)0.0035 (3)
C1—N11.347 (5)C5—H50.9300
C1—C21.376 (5)N1—Co12.133 (3)
C1—H10.9300O1—Co12.136 (2)
C2—C31.375 (6)O1—H1A0.817 (10)
C2—H20.9300O1—H1B0.812 (10)
C3—C41.372 (6)Cl1—Co12.5078 (9)
C3—H30.9300Co1—N1i2.133 (3)
C4—C51.379 (6)Co1—O1i2.136 (2)
C4—H40.9300Co1—Cl1i2.5078 (9)
C5—N11.338 (5)
N1—C1—C2122.9 (4)Co1—O1—H1A129 (3)
N1—C1—H1118.6Co1—O1—H1B108 (3)
C2—C1—H1118.6H1A—O1—H1B115 (3)
C3—C2—C1119.2 (4)N1—Co1—N1i180.0
C3—C2—H2120.4N1—Co1—O1i92.24 (11)
C1—C2—H2120.4N1i—Co1—O1i87.76 (11)
C4—C3—C2118.5 (4)N1—Co1—O187.76 (11)
C4—C3—H3120.8N1i—Co1—O192.24 (11)
C2—C3—H3120.8O1i—Co1—O1180.0
C3—C4—C5119.5 (4)N1—Co1—Cl1i89.65 (8)
C3—C4—H4120.2N1i—Co1—Cl1i90.35 (8)
C5—C4—H4120.2O1i—Co1—Cl1i88.46 (7)
N1—C5—C4122.6 (4)O1—Co1—Cl1i91.54 (7)
N1—C5—H5118.7N1—Co1—Cl190.35 (8)
C4—C5—H5118.7N1i—Co1—Cl189.65 (8)
C5—N1—C1117.3 (3)O1i—Co1—Cl191.54 (7)
C5—N1—Co1122.1 (3)O1—Co1—Cl188.46 (7)
C1—N1—Co1120.5 (3)Cl1i—Co1—Cl1180.0
N1—C1—C2—C31.5 (6)C5—N1—Co1—O1i−37.2 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.4 (6)C1—N1—Co1—O1i140.2 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.9 (6)C5—N1—Co1—O1142.8 (3)
C3—C4—C5—N11.2 (6)C1—N1—Co1—O1−39.8 (3)
C4—C5—N1—C1−0.1 (6)C5—N1—Co1—Cl1i−125.6 (3)
C4—C5—N1—Co1177.4 (3)C1—N1—Co1—Cl1i51.8 (3)
C2—C1—N1—C5−1.3 (6)C5—N1—Co1—Cl154.4 (3)
C2—C1—N1—Co1−178.8 (3)C1—N1—Co1—Cl1−128.2 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1A···Cl1ii0.82 (3)2.45 (3)3.266 (3)176 (5)
O1—H1B···Cl1iii0.81 (4)2.41 (4)3.156 (3)153 (4)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1A⋯Cl1i 0.82 (3)2.45 (3)3.266 (3)176 (5)
O1—H1B⋯Cl1ii 0.81 (4)2.41 (4)3.156 (3)153 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  9 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals.

Authors:  M C Etter; J C MacDonald; J Bernstein
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1990-04-01

3.  Cytotoxicity, radiosensitization, antitumor activity, and interaction with hyperthermia of a Co(III) mustard complex.

Authors:  B A Teicher; M J Abrams; K W Rosbe; T S Herman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Metal complexes with functionalised 2,2'-dipicolylamine ligand containing an antioxidant 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol moiety: synthesis and biological studies.

Authors:  Elena R Milaeva; Dmitry B Shpakovsky; Yulia A Gracheva; Sophia I Orlova; Viktoryia V Maduar; Boris N Tarasevich; Natalia N Meleshonkova; Ludmila G Dubova; Elena F Shevtsova
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.390

5.  A new cobalt(II) complex with 5-(4-pyrid-yl)tetra-zole ligands.

Authors:  Wei-Feng Zhu; Xing-Fen Zhou
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-10-31

6.  Tetra-aqua-bis(pyridine-κN)cobalt(II) bis-[4-amino-N-(6-chloro-pyridazin-3-yl)benzene-sulfonamidate].

Authors:  Nan Li; Hong-Li Zou; Xiao-Yan Song; Yan-Cheng Liu; Zhen-Feng Chen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-11-25

7.  Antiviral properties of cobalt(III)-complexes.

Authors:  James B Delehanty; Jason E Bongard; Dzung C Thach; D Andrew Knight; Thomas E Hickey; Eddie L Chang
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

9.  Antimicrobial activity of some thiourea derivatives and their nickel and copper complexes.

Authors:  Hakan Arslan; Nizami Duran; Gulay Borekci; Cemal Koray Ozer; Cevdet Akbay
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.