Literature DB >> 24426490

95 % confidence interval: a misunderstood statistical tool.

Deepti Choudhary1, Pankaj Kumar Garg2.   

Abstract

Year:  2012        PMID： 24426490      PMCID： PMC3824769          DOI： 10.1007/s12262-012-0555-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN： 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Confidence interval or p-value?: part 4 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Jean-Baptist du Prel; Gerhard Hommel; Bernd Röhrig; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-epididymal orchiectomy versus conventional orchiectomy in metastatic carcinoma of prostate.

Authors:  Shivadeo Bapat; Pratikshit M Mahajan; Ashish A Bhave; Yogesh B Kshirsagar; Yogesh B Sovani; Abhirudra Mulay
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 0.656
  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Mean (standard deviation) or mean (standard error of mean): time to ponder.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar Garg; Debajyoti Mohanty
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Large standard deviation: think before you write.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar Garg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  A Comparative Study of Clinical Profile and Relapse Patterns in TRIPLE-NEGATIVE and Non-Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Intent.

Authors:  Suryanarayana V S Deo; Nootan Kumar Shukla; Ajay Gogia; Daya Nand Sharma; Ashish Jakhetiya; Dillip Kumar Muduly; Pankaj Kumar Garg; Sandeep R Mathur; V S Reenivas
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.