Literature DB >> 24425721

How can the scientific community support the generation of the evidence needed to improve the quality of guidelines for micronutrient interventions?

Rebecca J Stoltzfus1.   

Abstract

The process used by the WHO to generate nutrition recommendations relies on high-quality research evidence, and this makes new demands on the research questions that nutrition scientists address. As a researcher involved in WHO nutrition guidelines development, my objective is to suggest ways in which our research can adapt to meet these demands. Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews generate the highest quality of evidence to support strong recommendations, yet even these methods leave controversies in which judgments must be made. Using examples from recent research and guidelines, 4 issues are highlighted that illustrate ways in which nutrition research can adapt to become more useful and informative to global nutrition guidelines. These issues include embedding mechanistic research within trials, explicit choice of design along the efficacy or effectiveness spectrum, anticipation of heterogeneity of effects, and the need for research on consumer or community values and preferences.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24425721      PMCID: PMC3884098          DOI: 10.3945/an.113.004721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  19 in total

1.  A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses.

Authors:  A D Oxman; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test.

Authors:  Sara T Brookes; Elise Whitely; Matthias Egger; George Davey Smith; Paul A Mulheran; Tim J Peters
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials.

Authors:  Cesar G Victora; Jean-Pierre Habicht; Jennifer Bryce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences.

Authors:  Murray Krahn; Gary Naglie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  In defense of black box epidemiology.

Authors:  D A Savitz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Current advances in sampling theory: implications for human observational studies.

Authors:  R M Royall
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 7.  Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs.

Authors:  B R Flay
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  The emptiness of the black box.

Authors:  P Skrabanek
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Screening for nutrition interventions: the risk or the differential-benefit approach?

Authors:  M T Ruel; J P Habicht; K M Rasmussen; R Martorell
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 10.  Neonatal vitamin A supplementation for prevention of mortality and morbidity in infancy: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Siddhartha Gogia; Harshpal Singh Sachdev
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-03-27
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of The Cochrane Collaboration in support of the WHO Nutrition Guidelines.

Authors:  David Tovey
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 2.  From biological to program efficacy: promoting dialogue among the research, policy, and program communities.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Habicht; Gretel H Pelto
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Improving the adaptability of WHO evidence-informed guidelines for nutrition actions: results of a mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Maria Cecilia Dedios; Alexo Esperato; Luz Maria De-Regil; Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas; Susan L Norris
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Improved micronutrient status and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries following large-scale fortification: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emily C Keats; Lynnette M Neufeld; Greg S Garrett; Mduduzi N N Mbuya; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Theory-Driven Process Evaluation of the SHINE Trial Using a Program Impact Pathway Approach.

Authors:  Mduduzi N N Mbuya; Andrew D Jones; Robert Ntozini; Jean H Humphrey; Lawrence H Moulton; Rebecca J Stoltzfus; John A Maluccio
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Why is multiple micronutrient powder ineffective at reducing anaemia among 12-24 month olds in Colombia? Evidence from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Alison Andrew; Orazio Attanasio; Emla Fitzsimons; Marta Rubio-Codina
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2016-03-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.