Literature DB >> 2442552

Comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to severe essential hypertension.

C Mörlin, H Baglivo, J K Boeijinga, A M Breckenridge, D Clement, G D Johnston, W Klein, R Kramer, R Luccioni, K A Meurer.   

Abstract

A total of 136 patients with mild to severe uncomplicated essential hypertension were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-placebo, parallel study to compare the effect of lisinopril, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, with that of nifedipine. Following a 2-week placebo control period the patients were treated with either 20-80 mg/day of lisinopril (n = 89) or with 40-80 mg/day of nifedipine (n = 47). Blood pressure was significantly reduced in both groups after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. There was no difference in the effect of lisinopril compared to nifedipine. No serious clinical or laboratory adverse experiences were observed during the study. The incidence of clinical side effects was significantly lower in the lisinopril group than in the nifedipine group (21.3 vs. 48.9%, p less than or equal to 0.01). There were no significant changes in laboratory data in either group. The results indicate that lisinopril is as effective as nifedipine in the treatment of uncomplicated essential hypertension and that lisinopril is well tolerated and has an acceptable safety profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2442552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.105


  12 in total

Review 1.  Safety profiles of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

Authors:  N J Warner; J E Rush
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and moderate hypertension.

Authors:  D McAreavey; J I Robertson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Comparative effects of fosinopril and nifedipine on regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: a double-blind study.

Authors:  H G Kirpizidis; G S Papazachariou
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.727

4.  Enalapril and nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: a 6 month comparison.

Authors:  D Maclean; L E Ramsay; P J Richardson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Lisinopril. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and congestive heart failure.

Authors:  S G Lancaster; P A Todd
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Lisinopril dose-response relationship in essential hypertension.

Authors:  H J Gomez; V J Cirillo; J A Sromovsky; E S Otterbein; W C Shaw; J E Rush; S G Chrysant; A H Gradman; A S Leon; E P MacCarthy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET). Rationale, methodology and comparison with previous trials.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; A E Fletcher; A Amery; J Coope; J G Evans; S Lightowlers; K O'Malley; A Palmer; J Potter; P Sever
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  A comparison of lisinopril and nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. A multicentre study.

Authors:  B Rogstad
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  The nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS). Evaluation of pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties.

Authors:  J S Grundy; R T Foster
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Hypertension and non-insulin-dependent diabetes. A comparison between an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium antagonist.

Authors:  G Crepaldi; A Carraro; E Brocco; L Adezati; D Andreani; G Bompiani; P Brunetti; D Fedele; R Giorgino; G Giustina
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.