Literature DB >> 2206783

Enalapril and nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: a 6 month comparison.

D Maclean1, L E Ramsay, P J Richardson.   

Abstract

1. In a double-blind, randomised, parallel group study, 128 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 125 mm Hg (Phase V) after 2-4 weeks run-in on placebo, received enalapril 10-40 mg once daily (65 patients) or nifedipine retard 10-40 mg twice daily (63 patients), utilising a double dummy technique. Dual target blood pressures were less than 150 mm Hg systolic and less than 90 mm Hg sitting diastolic. Inadequate responders had hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-50 mg once daily added. 2. The 3 h post-dose sitting blood pressures were lowered by 18/14 mm Hg (enalapril) and 20/14 mm Hg (nifedipine), but nifedipine gave greater standing reductions (16/13 mm Hg enalapril, 22/17 mm Hg nifedipine). The dual target blood pressures were achieved by 45% of those taking enalapril monotherapy and 43% of those taking nifedipine monotherapy. At the end of the hydrochlorothiazide phase the dual target pressures were achieved by 63% of the enalapril group and 56% of the nifedipine group. 3. Overall, 17 patients reported adverse events during the placebo run-in. During the active treatment-periods, 42 patients in the enalapril group experienced adverse events, as did 49 of those on nifedipine. Orthostatic effects were confined to those taking enalapril, whereas flushing/erythema, oedema and palpitations were more common in the nifedipine group. 4. Five patients in the enalapril and 14 in the nifedipine groups were withdrawn because of adverse events. One of those withdrawn on enalapril had angioneurotic oedema.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2206783      PMCID: PMC1368219          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03766.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  8 in total

1.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor versus calcium antagonist in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  H R Brunner; J Bidiville; G Waeber; M Porchet; J Nussberger; B Waeber
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.847

2.  Comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to severe essential hypertension.

Authors:  C Mörlin; H Baglivo; J K Boeijinga; A M Breckenridge; D Clement; G D Johnston; W Klein; R Kramer; R Luccioni; K A Meurer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  Cross-over comparison between captopril and nifedipine.

Authors:  W W Klein; W Stuhlinger; G Mahr
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Captopril and nifedipine interactions in the treatment of essential hypertensives: a crossover study.

Authors:  A Salvetti; P F Innocenti; M Iardella; F Pambianco; G C Saba; M Rossetti; G F Botta
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1987-12

5.  Enalapril & nifedipine in essential hypertension; synergism of the hypotensive effects in combination.

Authors:  T Morgan; A Anderson; J Hopper
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens A       Date:  1988

6.  Atenolol-nifedipine combinations compared to atenolol alone in hypertension: efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  D Maclean; E T Mitchell; R R Coulson; T J Fitzsimons; D G McDevitt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Lisinopril in essential hypertension: a six month comparative study with nifedipine.

Authors:  P J Richardson; B Meany; A M Breckenridge; S F Grimmer; G D Johnston; G Kondowe
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.012

8.  A comparison of long acting nifedipine and enalapril in elderly hypertensives: a randomised, single-blind, cross-over study.

Authors:  N L Gilchrist; M G Nicholls; T C Ewer; J H Livesey; R Sainsbury
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.012

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Cough and enalapril: assessment by spontaneous reporting and visual analogue scale under double-blind conditions.

Authors:  W W Yeo; D Maclean; P J Richardson; L E Ramsay
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Comparative effects of fosinopril and nifedipine on regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: a double-blind study.

Authors:  H G Kirpizidis; G S Papazachariou
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 3.  ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema. Incidence, prevention and management.

Authors:  W Vleeming; J G van Amsterdam; B H Stricker; D J de Wildt
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 3. Pharmacologic treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  R I Ogilvie; E D Burgess; J R Cusson; R D Feldman; L A Leiter; M G Myers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Enalapril. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in hypertension.

Authors:  P A Todd; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.