Literature DB >> 24425289

Multi-component ion modifiers and arcing suppressants to enhance differential mobility spectrometry for separation of peptides and drug molecules.

Voislav Blagojevic1, Gregory K Koyanagi, Diethard K Bohme.   

Abstract

The optimization of ion/molecule chemistry in a differential mobility spectrometer (DMS) is shown to result in improved peak capacity, separation, and sensitivity. We have experimented with a modifier composed of multiple components, where each component accomplishes a specific task on mixtures of peptides and small drug molecules. Use of a higher proton affinity modifier (hexanol) provides increased peak capacity and separation. Analyte ion/modifier proton transfer is suppressed by adding a large excess of low proton affinity modifier (water or methanol), significantly increasing signal intensity and sensitivity for low proton affinity analytes. Finally, addition of an electrical arcing suppressant (chloroform) allows the device to operate reliably at higher separation fields, improving peak capacity and separation. We demonstrate a 20% increase in the device peak capacity without any loss of sensitivity and estimate that further optimization of the modifier composition can increase this to 50%. Use of 3-, 4-, or even 5-component modifiers offers the opportunity for the user to fine-tune the modifier performance to maximize the device performance, something not possible with a single component modifier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24425289     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-013-0800-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  12 in total

1.  Planar differential mobility spectrometer as a pre-filter for atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Bradley B Schneider; Thomas R Covey; Stephen L Coy; Evgeny V Krylov; Erkinjon G Nazarov
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Separation of ions from explosives in differential mobility spectrometry by vapor-modified drift gas.

Authors:  G A Eiceman; E V Krylov; N S Krylova; E G Nazarov; R A Miller
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Nanospray FAIMS fractionation provides significant increases in proteome coverage of unfractionated complex protein digests.

Authors:  Kristian E Swearingen; Michael R Hoopmann; Richard S Johnson; Ramsey A Saleem; John D Aitchison; Robert L Moritz
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Characterization of gas-phase molecular interactions on differential mobility ion behavior utilizing an electrospray ionization-differential mobility-mass spectrometer system.

Authors:  Daren S Levin; Paul Vouros; Raanan A Miller; Erkinjon G Nazarov; James C Morris
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Characterization of phosphorylated peptides using traveling wave-based and drift cell ion mobility mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Konstantinos Thalassinos; Megan Grabenauer; Susan E Slade; Gillian R Hilton; Michael T Bowers; James H Scrivens
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Using a nanoelectrospray-differential mobility spectrometer-mass spectrometer system for the analysis of oligosaccharides with solvent selected control over ESI aggregate ion formation.

Authors:  Daren S Levin; Paul Vouros; Raanan A Miller; Erkinjon G Nazarov
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Gas-phase basicities for ions from bradykinin and its des-arginine analogues.

Authors:  N P Ewing; G A Pallante; X Zhang; C J Cassady
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.982

8.  Differential mobility spectrometry of isomeric protonated dipeptides: modifier and field effects on ion mobility and stability.

Authors:  Voislav Blagojevic; Alexander Chramow; Bradley B Schneider; Thomas R Covey; Diethard K Bohme
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Detection of Radiation-Exposure Biomarkers by Differential Mobility Prefiltered Mass Spectrometry (DMS-MS).

Authors:  Stephen L Coy; Evgeny V Krylov; Bradley B Schneider; Thomas R Covey; David J Brenner; John B Tyburski; Andrew D Patterson; Kris W Krausz; Albert J Fornace; Erkinjon G Nazarov
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Chemical effects in the separation process of a differential mobility/mass spectrometer system.

Authors:  Bradley B Schneider; Thomas R Covey; Stephen L Coy; Evgeny V Krylov; Erkinjon G Nazarov
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  5 in total

1.  Differential Mobility Spectrometry for Improved Selectivity in Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Paralytic Shellfish Toxins.

Authors:  Daniel G Beach
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Description of gas-phase ion/neutral interactions in differential ion mobility spectrometry: CV prediction using calibration runs.

Authors:  David Auerbach; Julia Aspenleiter; Dietrich A Volmer
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  DMS as an orthogonal separation to LC/ESI/MS/MS for quantifying isomeric cerebrosides in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  Hongbin Xu; Frederic R Boucher; Thao T Nguyen; Graeme P Taylor; Julianna J Tomlinson; Roberto A Ortega; Brigitte Simons; Michael G Schlossmacher; Rachel Saunders-Pullman; Walt Shaw; Steffany A L Bennett
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.922

4.  Characterization of Complete Histone Tail Proteoforms Using Differential Ion Mobility Spectrometry.

Authors:  Pavel V Shliaha; Matthew A Baird; Mogens M Nielsen; Vladimir Gorshkov; Andrew P Bowman; Julia L Kaszycki; Ole N Jensen; Alexandre A Shvartsburg
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  To What Extent is FAIMS Beneficial in the Analysis of Proteins?

Authors:  Helen J Cooper
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.109

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.