Literature DB >> 24422861

Circular closure is associated with the lowest rate of surgical site infection following stoma reversal: a systematic review and multiple treatment meta-analysis.

L T Li1, S C Hicks, J A Davila, L S Kao, R L Berger, N A Arita, M K Liang.   

Abstract

AIM: Stoma reversal is frequently complicated by surgical site infection (SSI). To reduce SSI, several techniques for skin closure have been studied, with no agreement on which is best. The aim of this study was to identify the skin closure technique associated with the lowest rate of SSI following stoma reversal.
METHOD: We systematically searched MEDLINE (PubMed and OvidSP), Scopus and clinical registries from 1 January 1980 to 24 March 2012, and included original reports on adult patients following stoma reversal. A network of treatments was created to map the comparisons between skin closure techniques, including primary closure, primary closure with a drain, secondary closure, delayed primary closure, loose primary closure and circular closure. Pairwise meta-analyses were performed for all available direct comparisons of closure types and heterogeneity was assessed. A multiple-treatments meta-analysis was conducted to estimate relative treatment effects between competing closure types (reported as an odds ratio with 95% credible interval, and a probability that each treatment is best). Several sensitivity analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified with a total of 2921 cases of stoma reversal. Overall, study quality was poor with observed low (one study), moderate (seven studies) and high (seven studies) risk of bias. Circular closure was associated with the lowest SSI risk (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02-0.40) and was the best of six skin closure techniques (probability of being best = 68.9%). Circular closure remained the best after sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that circular closure is the best skin closure technique after stoma reversal in terms of SSI rate, but the quality of supporting evidence is limited, precluding definite conclusions. Colorectal Disease
© 2014 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ostomy; colostomy; enterostomy; ileostomy; takedown; wound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24422861     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  11 in total

Review 1.  Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults.

Authors:  F Ferrara; D Parini; A Bondurri; M Veltri; M Barbierato; F Pata; F Cattaneo; A Tafuri; C Forni; G Roveron; G Rizzo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  The Effectiveness of Contralateral Drainage in Reducing Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Loop Ileostomy Closure: Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Anna Serracant; Xavier Serra-Aracil; Laura Mora-López; Anna Pallisera-Lloveras; Sheila Serra-Pla; Alba Zárate-Pinedo; Salvador Navarro-Soto
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Early Closure of Defunctioning Loop Ileostomy: Is It Beneficial for the Patient? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Menahem; Jean Lubrano; Antoine Vallois; Arnaud Alves
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Purse-string approximation vs. primary closure with a drain for stoma reversal surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kunihiko Amano; Hideyuki Ishida; Kensuke Kumamoto; Norimichi Okada; Satoshi Hatano; Noriyasu Chika; Yusuke Tajima; Tomonori Ohsawa; Masaru Yokoyama; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Erito Mochiki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Temporary closure of colostomy with suture before colostomy takedown improves the postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Wan-Hsiang Hu; Ko-Chao Lee; Kai-Lung Tsai; Hong-Hwa Chen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  THE VULKAN TECHNIQUE: A NOVEL OSTOMY-CLOSURE TECHNIQUE THAT REDUCES COMPLICATIONS AND OPERATIVE TIMES.

Authors:  Felix Krenzien; Christian Benzing; Fabian Harders; Tido Junghans; Gyurdhan Rasim; Claudia Bothe; Johann Pratschke; Ricardo Zorron
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

7.  Stomal Closure: Strategies to Prevent Incisional Hernia.

Authors:  Rhiannon L Harries; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-04-04

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials comparing purse-string vs conventional linear closure of the wound following ileostomy (stoma) closure.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Muhammad I Bhatti; William Fa Miles
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-07-10

9.  Purse-String Versus Linear Conventional Skin Wound Closure of an Ileostomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mina Alvandipour; Babak Gharedaghi; Hamed Khodabakhsh; Mohammad Yasin Karami
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2016-08-31

10.  Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwelling after stoma closure: a retrospective and propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Yoshinori Yane; Jin-Ichi Hida; Yasutaka Chiba; Yusuke Makutani; Hokuto Ushijima; Yasumasa Yoshioka; Masayoshi Iwamoto; Toshiaki Wada; Koji Daito; Tadao Tokoro; Kazuki Ueda; Junichiro Kawamura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.