Literature DB >> 24422676

Intussusception risk after rotavirus vaccination in U.S. infants.

W Katherine Yih1, Tracy A Lieu, Martin Kulldorff, David Martin, Cheryl N McMahill-Walraven, Richard Platt, Nandini Selvam, Mano Selvan, Grace M Lee, Michael Nguyen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: International postlicensure studies have identified an increased risk of intussusception after vaccination with the second-generation rotavirus vaccines RotaTeq (RV5, a pentavalent vaccine) and Rotarix (RV1, a monovalent vaccine). We studied this association among infants in the United States.
METHODS: The study included data from infants 5.0 to 36.9 weeks of age who were enrolled in three U.S. health plans that participate in the Mini-Sentinel program sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration. Potential cases of intussusception and vaccine exposures from 2004 through mid-2011 were identified through procedural and diagnostic codes. Medical records were reviewed to confirm the occurrence of intussusception and the status with respect to rotavirus vaccination. The primary analysis used a self-controlled risk-interval design that included only vaccinated children. The secondary analysis used a cohort design that included exposed and unexposed person-time.
RESULTS: The analyses included 507,874 first doses and 1,277,556 total doses of RV5 and 53,638 first doses and 103,098 total doses of RV1. The statistical power for the analysis of RV1 was lower than that for the analysis of RV5. The number of excess cases of intussusception per 100,000 recipients of the first dose of RV5 was significantly elevated, both in the primary analysis (attributable risk, 1.1 [95% confidence interval, 0.3 to 2.7] for the 7-day risk window and 1.5 [95% CI, 0.2 to 3.2] for the 21-day risk window) and in the secondary analysis (attributable risk, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.2 to 3.2] for the 21-day risk window). No significant increase in risk was seen after dose 2 or 3. The results with respect to the primary analysis of RV1 were not significant, but the secondary analysis showed a significant risk after dose 2.
CONCLUSIONS: RV5 was associated with approximately 1.5 (95% CI, 0.2 to 3.2) excess cases of intussusception per 100,000 recipients of the first dose. The secondary analysis of RV1 suggested a potential risk, although the study of RV1 was underpowered. These risks must be considered in light of the demonstrated benefits of rotavirus vaccination. (Funded by the Food and Drug Administration.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24422676     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  99 in total

1.  Perspectives on benefit-risk decision-making in vaccinology: Conference report.

Authors:  M Greenberg; F Simondon; M Saadatian-Elahi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Deaths following vaccination: What does the evidence show?

Authors:  Elaine R Miller; Pedro L Moro; Maria Cano; Tom T Shimabukuro
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Rotavirus vaccines: current status and future considerations.

Authors:  Catherine Yen; Jacqueline E Tate; Terri B Hyde; Margaret M Cortese; Benjamin A Lopman; Baoming Jiang; Roger I Glass; Umesh D Parashar
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Risk of Intussusception After Rotavirus Vaccination.

Authors:  Judith Koch; Thomas Harder; Rüdiger von Kries; Ole Wichmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Bioengineered Norovirus S60 Nanoparticles as a Multifunctional Vaccine Platform.

Authors:  Ming Xia; Pengwei Huang; Chen Sun; Ling Han; Frank S Vago; Kunpeng Li; Weiming Zhong; Wen Jiang; John S Klassen; Xi Jiang; Ming Tan
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Lessons Learned From Making and Implementing Vaccine Recommendations in the U.S.

Authors:  L Reed Walton; Walter A Orenstein; Larry K Pickering
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Technology-Enabled Outreach to Patients Taking High-Risk Medications Reduces a Quality Gap in Completion of Clinical Laboratory Testing.

Authors:  Marsha A Raebel; Susan M Shetterly; Bharati Bhardwaja; Andrew T Sterrett; Emily B Schroeder; Joseph Chorny; Tyson P Hagen; David J Silverman; Rex Astles; Ira M Lubin
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 8.  Leveraging the Capabilities of the FDA's Sentinel System To Improve Kidney Care.

Authors:  Sruthi Adimadhyam; Erin F Barreto; Noelle M Cocoros; Sengwee Toh; Jeffrey S Brown; Judith C Maro; Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay; Gerald J Dal Pan; Robert Ball; David Martin; Michael Nguyen; Richard Platt; Xiaojuan Li
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 9.  Overview of the First Natural Language Processing Challenge for Extracting Medication, Indication, and Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Record Notes (MADE 1.0).

Authors:  Abhyuday Jagannatha; Feifan Liu; Weisong Liu; Hong Yu
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Management for intussusception in children.

Authors:  Steven Gluckman; Jonathan Karpelowsky; Angela C Webster; Richard G McGee
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.