| Literature DB >> 24422429 |
Allison King1, Souvik Chakrabarty, Wei Zhang, Xiaomei Zeng, Dennis E Ohman, Lynn F Wood, Sheena Abraham, Raj Rao, Kenneth J Wynne.
Abstract
The alkyl chain length of quaternary ammonium/PEG copolyoxetanes has been varied to discern effects on solution antimicrobial efficacy, hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity. Monomers 3-((4-bromobutoxy)methyl)-3-methyloxetane (BBOx) and 3-((2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)methyl)-3-methyloxetane (ME2Ox) were used to prepare precursor P[(BBOx)(ME2Ox)-50:50-4 kDa] copolyoxetane via cationic ring opening polymerization. The 1:1 copolymer composition and Mn (4 kDa) were confirmed by (1)H NMR spectroscopy. After C-Br substitution by a series of tertiary amines, ionic liquid Cx-50 copolyoxetanes were obtained, where 50 is the mole percent of quaternary repeat units and "x" is quaternary alkyl chain length (2, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, or 16 carbons). Modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC) studies showed Tgs between -40 and -60 °C and melting endotherms for C14-50 and C16-50. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined for Escherichia coli , Staphylococcus aureus , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa . A systematic dependence of MIC on alkyl chain length was found. The most effective antimicrobials were in the C6-50 to C12-50 range. C8-50 had better overall performance with MICs of 4 μg/mL, E. coli ; 2 μg/mL, S. aureus ; and 24 μg/mL, P. aeruginosa . At 5 × MIC, C8-50 effected >99% kill in 1 h against S. aureus , E. coli , and P. aeruginosa challenges of 10(8) cfu/mL; log reductions (1 h) were 7, 3, and 5, respectively. To provide additional insight into polycation interactions with bacterial membranes, a geometric model based on the dimensions of E. coli is described that provides an estimate of the maximum number of polycations that can chemisorb. Chain dimensions were estimated for polycation C8-50 with a molecular weight of 5 kDa. Considering the approximations for polycation chemisorption (PCC), it is surprising that a calculation based on geometric considerations gives a C8-50 concentration within a factor of 2 of the MIC, 4.0 (±1.2) μg/mL for E. coli . Cx-50 copolyoxetane cytotoxicity was low for human red blood cells, human dermal fibroblasts (HDF), and human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF). Selectivities for bacterial kill over cell lysis were among the highest ever reported for polycations indicating good prospects for biocompatibility.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24422429 PMCID: PMC3998775 DOI: 10.1021/bm401794p
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomacromolecules ISSN: 1525-7797 Impact factor: 6.988
Cx-50 Copolyoxetane Selectivities Calculated According to Eq 3a
| C | RBC | HFF | HDF | RBC | HFF | HDF | RBC | HFF | HDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C6-50 | 114 | 9000 | 9200 | 283 | 2200 | 2300 | 25 | 2000 | 2000 |
| C8-50 | 65 | 9300 | 9100 | 152 | 2100 | 2100 | 13 | 1800 | 1700 |
| C10-50 | 56 | 5700 | 5900 | 107 | 1100 | 11000 | 15 | 1500 | 1500 |
Selectivities for HFF and HDF are rounded to the nearest thousand.
Figure 11H NMR spectrum (400 MHz) after TFAA addition to P[BBOx-ME2Ox]. Assignments for α and β end group peaks are shown.
Feed and Output Ratio for Quaternization of P[(BBOx)(ME2Ox)-50:50-4] and with Cx-50 Tg
| feed, P[(BBOx)(ME2Ox)-50:50-4], g (mmol) | feed, C | ratio C | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2.0 (0.35) | 0.6 (8.2) | 50/50 | –61 |
| 6 | 2.5 (0.44) | 1.42 (11.0) | 49.5/50 | –60 |
| 8 | 2.18 (0.38) | 1.55 (9.87) | 50.2/50 | –56 |
| 10 | 2.5 (0.44) | 1.75 (9.46) | 50.4/50 | –50 |
| 12 | 3 (0.53) | 4 (13.6) | 50/50 | –50 |
| 14 | 2 (0.035) | 2.17 (10.1) | 50.3/50 | –47 (−7) |
| 16 | 1.51 (0.27) | 1.84 (6.84) | 50.1/50 | –48 (7.2) |
Based on BBOx.
Ratio of Cx to ME2Ox from 1H NMR integration.
Figure 6ChemDraw3D structural representations for C8-50; the structure is an exactly alternating 16-mer end-capped with −CH3; MW = 4784 g/mol. Two MM2 energy minimizations were followed by an MM2 molecular dynamics using default parameters. The quaternary nitrogen was modeled as carbon; oxygen atoms are red; lone pairs are rose colored.
End Group Analysis for Determination of Mn
| DP | GPC | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| –CH3 | –CH2CH2– | α | β | α/ β | γ | α + β | γ | α + β | γ | PD | |||
| shift/ppm (area, S) | 0.93 (15.98) | 1.6, 1.9 (10.29) | 4.26 (0.81) | 4.32 (0.34) | 2.4 | 0.85 (0.47) | 18 | 16 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.2 |
After addition of TFAA.
Neat P[(BBOx)-(ME2Ox)] copolyoxetane; Figure 1.
DP, degree of polymerization.
Excludes low MW peak assigned to cyclic tetramer.
Figure 2MDSC thermograms for Cx-50 and the intermediate P[(BBOx)(ME2Ox)-50:50-5.7]. Melting endotherms: C14-50, 5.5 J/g; C16-50, 22.4 J/g).
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations for Cx-50 Copolyoxetanesa
| C | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| C2-50 | >90 | >90 | >120 |
| C6-50 | 6.7 (±0.6) | 2.7 (±0.6) | 30.7 (±0.6) |
| C8-50 | 4.0 (±1.2) | 2.0 (±0) | 24.0 (±2.8) |
| C10-50 | 6.3 (±0.6) | 3.3 (±0.6) | 24.7 (±1.2) |
| C12-50 | 7.3 (±0.6) | 8.7 (±0.6) | 27.7 (±2.5) |
| C14-50 | 10.3 (±0.6) | 10.7 (±0.6) | 31.7 (±1.5) |
| C16-50 | 13.3 (±1.2) | 12.7 (±2.1) | 41.0 (±3.6) |
| DTAB | 17 (6) | 37 (6) | 103 (15) |
| DTAB | 77 | 19 | >154 |
Concentrations in μg/mL followed by (sd).
DTAB: dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide.[1]
DTAB results reported by Seifert.[2]
Figure 3Minimum inhibitory concentrations as a function of quaternary chain length for Cx-50: blue, E. coli; red, S. aureus; green, P. aeruginosa.
Figure 4Kill kinetics at 5 times MIC for C8–50: (A) E. coli; (B) P. aeruginosa; (C) S. aureus.
Figure 5Geometric model for chemisorbed polycations: total surface area of E. coli, 8 μm2; polycation cross-section area, 3 nm2.
Comparison of Cell Toxicity and Selectivity for Representative Polymeric and Molecular Polycationsa
Selectivities use published MIC (μg/mL) and EC50 or HC50 (μg/mL) data. Where MICs for multiple bacteria are reported, S is reported in the sequence: no bracket, one bracket, two brackets. This is a notation that corresponds to the bacteria MICs.
Cytotoxicity for Cx-50 Copolyoxetanes
| EC50 | HC50 (μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| C | HFF | HDF | RBC |
| C6-50 | 60000 | 61000 | 762 |
| C8-50 | 42000 | 41000 | 303 |
| C10-50 | 36000 | 37000 | 353 |
Rounded to the nearest thousand.
Figure 7Percent RBC lysis vs Cx-50 concentration: (A) C6-50; (B) C8-50; (C) C10-50; (D) C12-50. Lines are meant to guide the eye.
Figure 8Percent RBC lysis as a function of Cx-50 concentration: (A) C6-50; (B) C8-50; (C) C10-50.