Judy N Chin1, Ronald N Jones, Helio S Sader, Paul B Savage, Michael J Rybak. 1. Anti-infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, 259 Mack Avenue, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Previous data from our research had shown that the novel ceragenin, CSA-13, demonstrated concentration-dependent bactericidal activity against glycopeptide-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. However, it is unknown whether CSA-13 demonstrates a similar property against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We evaluated CSA-13 antipseudomonal activity compared with cefepime, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin by susceptibility testing as well as in combination with cefepime, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin. METHODS: Fifty clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were analysed by reference broth microdilution methods. Four strains with various susceptibilities were evaluated by time-killing curve (TKC) analysis at 0.5x, 1x, 2x and 4x MIC using an initial inoculum of 10(6) cfu/mL. For synergy testing, TKC analysis of CSA-13 alone and in combination with cefepime, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin at 0.5x MIC was performed. RESULTS: CSA-13 MIC50 and MBC50 were 16 and 16 mg/L, respectively. TKC analysis demonstrated concentration-dependent activity, with CSA-13 at 4x MIC achieving earliest kill at 1 h (99.9%, detection limit). Combination TKC analysis demonstrated synergy or additive effect with cefepime and ciprofloxacin, in some cases achieving early synergy. The addition of tobramycin to CSA-13 resulted in no difference in kill for two strains. CONCLUSIONS: CSA-13 showed concentration-dependent activity against clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, including multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. The addition of cefepime or ciprofloxacin to CSA-13 enhanced bacterial kill, achieving early synergy.
OBJECTIVES: Previous data from our research had shown that the novel ceragenin, CSA-13, demonstrated concentration-dependent bactericidal activity against glycopeptide-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. However, it is unknown whether CSA-13 demonstrates a similar property against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We evaluated CSA-13 antipseudomonal activity compared with cefepime, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin by susceptibility testing as well as in combination with cefepime, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin. METHODS: Fifty clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were analysed by reference broth microdilution methods. Four strains with various susceptibilities were evaluated by time-killing curve (TKC) analysis at 0.5x, 1x, 2x and 4x MIC using an initial inoculum of 10(6) cfu/mL. For synergy testing, TKC analysis of CSA-13 alone and in combination with cefepime, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin at 0.5x MIC was performed. RESULTS:CSA-13 MIC50 and MBC50 were 16 and 16 mg/L, respectively. TKC analysis demonstrated concentration-dependent activity, with CSA-13 at 4x MIC achieving earliest kill at 1 h (99.9%, detection limit). Combination TKC analysis demonstrated synergy or additive effect with cefepime and ciprofloxacin, in some cases achieving early synergy. The addition of tobramycin to CSA-13 resulted in no difference in kill for two strains. CONCLUSIONS:CSA-13 showed concentration-dependent activity against clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, including multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. The addition of cefepime or ciprofloxacin to CSA-13 enhanced bacterial kill, achieving early synergy.
Authors: Elizabeth A Trainor; Katherine E Horton; Paul B Savage; Traci L Testerman; David J McGee Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: K D Sinclair; T X Pham; R W Farnsworth; D L Williams; C Loc-Carrillo; L A Horne; S H Ingebretsen; R D Bloebaum Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Dustin L Williams; Julia M Lerdahl; Bryan S Haymond; Roy D Bloebaum Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-01-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Raquel F Epand; Jake E Pollard; Jonathan O Wright; Paul B Savage; Richard M Epand Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-06-28 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: K Leszczyńska; A Namiot; K Cruz; F J Byfield; E Won; G Mendez; W Sokołowski; P B Savage; R Bucki; P A Janmey Journal: J Appl Microbiol Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 3.772
Authors: Robert Bucki; Dorota B Namiot; Zbigniew Namiot; Paul B Savage; Paul A Janmey Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Jillian L Descourouez; Margaret R Jorgenson; Justine E Wergin; Warren E Rose Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Katarzyna Leszczyńska; Andrzej Namiot; David E Fein; Qi Wen; Zbigniew Namiot; Paul B Savage; Scott Diamond; Paul A Janmey; Robert Bucki Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 3.605