| Literature DB >> 24421910 |
Hong Xiao1, Huai-Yu Tian2, Li-Dong Gao3, Hai-Ning Liu1, Liang-Song Duan4, Nicole Basta5, Bernard Cazelles6, Xiu-Jun Li7, Xiao-Ling Lin1, Hong-Wei Wu4, Bi-Yun Chen3, Hui-Suo Yang7, Bing Xu2, Bryan Grenfell5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: China has the highest incidence of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) worldwide. Reported cases account for 90% of the total number of global cases. By 2010, approximately 1.4 million HFRS cases had been reported in China. This study aimed to explore the effect of the rodent reservoir, and natural and socioeconomic variables, on the transmission pattern of HFRS. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24421910 PMCID: PMC3888453 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1Distribution of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) cases in Chenzhou, 2006–2010.
Data sources and illustration.
| Data | Sources | Illustration |
| Patient data | Hunan Center for Disease Control and Prevention | Case reports |
| Rodent density | Hunan Center for Disease Control and Prevention | Monitoring reports |
| NDVI | International Scientific Data Service Platform | Remote sensing images |
| Temperature | China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System | Site data |
| Precipitation | China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System | Site data |
| Humidity | China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System | Site data |
| The urbanization rate | Hunan Statistics Yearbook | Statistics reports |
| GDP | Hunan Statistics Yearbook | Statistics reports |
Figure 2HFRS cases and rodent density.
The number of rodents of each species captured, 2006–2010.
|
|
|
|
|
| Others species | |
|
| 68 | 48 | 35 | 11 | 4 | 8 |
|
| 48 | 24 | 56 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 47 | 7 | 74 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
|
| 39 | 7 | 93 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 34 | 7 | 65 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 3HFRS cases and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for cultivated land.
Figure 4HFRS cases and meteorological factors.
Coefficients for the relationship between principal components and variables.
| Principal components | Rodent density | NDVI | Temperature | Precipitation | Relative humidity | Urbanization rate | GDP |
|
| 0.421 | 0.556 | 0.572 | 0.207 | −0.378 | ||
|
| 0.059 | 0.079 | −0.052 | 0.681 | 0.555 | ||
|
| 0.759 | 0.015 | −0.946 | −0.400 | 0.504 | ||
|
| 0.574 | 0.608 |
Cross-correlation coefficients of the variables and notifications of HFRS.
| Variables | Lag 0 | Lag 1 | Lag 2 | Lag 3 | Lag 4 | Lag 5 | Lag 6 |
|
| −0.173 | −0.114 | −0.076 | 0.092 | 0.256 | 0.127 | 0.354 |
|
| −0.277 | −0.048 | 0.227 | 0.431 | 0.476 | 0.490 | 0.379 |
|
| −0.388 | −0.136 | 0.11 | 0.33 | 0.475 | 0.515 | 0.417 |
|
| −0.23 | −0.217 | −0.153 | 0.247 | 0.162 | 0.411 | 0.396 |
|
| −0.01 | 0.123 | 0.181 | 0.247 | 0.13 | 0.07 | −0.122 |
|
| 0.002 | 0.131 | −0.087 | −0.102 | 0.179 | −0.166 | 0.125 |
|
| −0.229 | −0.223 | −0.089 | 0.239 | −0.289 | 0.153 | 0.101 |
|
| 0.204 | 0.045 | 0.093 | −0.054 | −0.077 | −0.523 | −0.136 |
|
| −0.376 | −0.114 | −0.221 | −0.283 | 0.088 | −0.141 | −0.069 |
P<0.05,
P<0.01.
Fitted results of the model.
| MODEL-1 | MODEL-2 | MODEL-3 | |||||||||||
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | lag-1 | lag-2 | |
| Constant term | 0.664 | 0.050 | 0.692 | 0.539 | −0.080 | 0.776 | −2.267 | −0.012 | −0.017 | 0.427 | −0.268 | 0.214 | 0.338 |
| Linear coefficient | 0.227 | −0.830 | 0.928 | 0.076 | −1.029 | 0.952 | 0.612 | −0.259 | −1.042 | 0.889 | 5.950 | −0.455 | 0.028 |
| Quadratic coefficient | 0.118 | 0.741 | 0.815 | −0.002 | 0.502 | 0.825 | −0.619 | −0.034 | 0.732 | 0.892 | −2.077 | −0.283 | |
| Cubic coefficient | 0.337 | 1.910 | 0.355 | 0.307 | 1.712 | 0.395 | 2.004 | 0.665 | 2.045 | 0.435 | −3.800 | ||
| R2 | 0.656 | 0.677 | 0.857 | ||||||||||
| AIC | 5.023 | 5.106 | 4.799 | ||||||||||
| RMSE | 2.441 | 2.366 | 1.573 | ||||||||||
Figure 5Fitted result of the optimal model.