Literature DB >> 24420736

Incidence, risks and outcome of radiological leak following early contrast enema after anterior resection.

Frank Reilly1, John P Burke, Eline Appelmans, Talha Manzoor, Joseph Deasy, Deborah A McNamara.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a major complication following anterior resection for colorectal cancer. Early contrast enema may diagnose subclinical anastomotic leakage. Knowledge of factors concerning AL is vital to its detection. The aim of this study was to define the incidence, risks and outcome of radiological leak following routine early contrast enema after anterior resection.
METHODS: A cohort of 129 patients who underwent anterior resection for colorectal cancer and had an early Gastrografin enema between July 2008 and December 2012 in a tertiary referral centre was identified from a prospective database. The severity of AL was defined using the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISREC) grading system.
RESULTS: Of the 129 patients, 65.1 % were male, and the mean age at surgery was 64.6 ± 1.1 years. Gastrografin enema was performed on average on post-operative day 4.8 ± 0.2. Eighteen patients (14.0 %) had a radiological leak on Gastrografin enema, and nine patients (7.0 %) had a clinical AL. On multivariate analysis, only being of male sex and having a loop ileostomy increased the risk of radiological AL. Gastrografin enema had a sensitivity of 100 % (95 % CI 66-100 %) and specificity of 93 % (95 % CI 86-97 %) for predicting clinical AL. Of the 18 patients with radiological leaks, 11 were ISREC grade A, 3 were grade B and 4 were grade C.
CONCLUSIONS: In the current series, early Gastrografin enema following anterior resection identifies a 14 % radiological leak rate and has a high sensitivity and specificity for predicting clinical AL. The majority of radiological leaks may be managed conservatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24420736     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1820-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  25 in total

1.  Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C S McArdle; D C McMillan; D J Hole
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Anterior Resection for Malignant Lesions of the Upper Part of the Rectum and Lower Part of the Sigmoid.

Authors:  C F Dixon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1948-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Early, minimally invasive closure of anastomotic leaks: a new concept.

Authors:  T Verlaan; S A L Bartels; M I van Berge Henegouwen; P J Tanis; P Fockens; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 4.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Little consensus in either definition or diagnosis of a lower gastro-intestinal anastomotic leak amongst colorectal surgeons.

Authors:  K Adams; S Papagrigoriadis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Norbert Hüser; Christoph W Michalski; Mert Erkan; Tibor Schuster; Robert Rosenberg; Jörg Kleeff; Helmut Friess
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients.

Authors:  Koianka Trencheva; Kevin P Morrissey; Martin Wells; Carol A Mancuso; Sang W Lee; Toyooki Sonoda; Fabrizio Michelassi; Mary E Charlson; Jeffrey W Milsom
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group.

Authors:  Jun Seok Park; Gyu-Seog Choi; Seon Hahn Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim; Nam Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Sung Bum Kang; Ji Yeon Kim; Kil Yeon Lee; Byung Chun Kim; Byung Noe Bae; Gyung Mo Son; Sun Il Lee; Hyun Kang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Neoadjuvant therapy and anastomotic leak after tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Guillaume Martel; Youssuf Al-Suhaibani; Husein Moloo; Fatima Haggar; Martin Friedlich; Joseph Mamazza; Eric C Poulin; Hartley Stern; Robin P Boushey
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with anastomotic leakage requiring reoperation after colorectal resection: cohort study based on prospective data.

Authors:  Mads Klein; Ismail Gögenur; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-09-26
View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of Adjuvant Therapy Compliance and Anastomotic Leakage on the Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Rectal Cancer After Curative Resection.

Authors:  Chao Fang; Pan Nie; Pengfei Jing; Yunlu Zhang; Lie Yang; Yongyang Yu; Cun Wang; Zongguang Zhou
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Prospective Analysis of More than 1,000 Patients with Rectal Carcinoma: Are There Gender-Related Differences?

Authors:  Markus Kleemann; Claudia Benecke; Diana Helfrich; Hans-Peter Bruch; Tobias Keck; Tilman Laubert
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-04

3.  Leakage after Surgery for Rectum Cancer: Inconsistency in Reporting to the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group.

Authors:  L Borly; M B Ellebæk; N Qvist
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2015-11-09

Review 4.  Less is more-the best test for anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer patients prior to ileostomy reversal.

Authors:  Flavius Sandra-Petrescu; Florian Herrle; Simon Lindner; Steffen Eitelbuss; Svetlana Hetjens; Joshua Gawlitza; Julia Hardt; Steffen Seyfried; Christian Galata; Christoph Reissfelder
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.571

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.