Literature DB >> 24419417

Survival outcome assessed according to tumor response and shrinkage pattern in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib or erlotinib.

Masayuki Takeda1, Isamu Okamoto, Kazuhiko Nakagawa.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) are associated with a marked therapeutic response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical indicators of the likely survival benefit of EGFR-TKI treatment in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations have not been identified, however. We therefore evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to tumor response and tumor shrinkage pattern in such patients.
METHODS: Among 145 EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, 68 individuals were selected for analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 68 selected patients, 6 achieved a complete response (CR), 42 a partial response (PR), and 14 stable disease (SD). Both PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients who achieved a CR or PR than in those who experienced SD. Multivariate analysis showed that a response (CR or PR) to EGFR-TKIs was significantly associated with both PFS and OS. Among the CR/PR group, the median maximal tumor shrinkage relative to baseline was 56%, and the median time to response (TTR) was 4.2 weeks. The subsets of these patients who experienced rapid tumor regression (TTR of ≤4.2 weeks) or a high degree of tumor shrinkage (≥56%) did not show a more favorable PFS or OS compared with those who experienced slow tumor regression or a low degree of tumor shrinkage.
CONCLUSION: Response (CR or PR) may represent the optimal surrogate for efficacy among EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24419417      PMCID: PMC4132038          DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


The clinical course of EGFR-TKI–treated patients with EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC shows substantial variation. The identification of clinically relevant indicators may provide clinicians with information regarding expected disease progression and prognosis. As far as we are aware, however, no previous studies have evaluated survival according to clinical indicators, such as tumor response and tumor shrinkage pattern, for patients with EGFR mutation– positive NSCLC. Several studies have investigated surrogate end points of response for association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. For individuals with advanced NSCLC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, those showing a partial response (PR) were thus found to have a better survival than those with stable disease (SD) in one study.[1] In contrast, another study found no significant difference between PR and SD groups with respect to PFS or OS.[2] It therefore remains unclear whether SD benefit for patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy is the same that as the benefit for those who achieve a complete response (CR) or PR. With regard to treatment with EGFR-TKIs in unselected patients with advanced NSCLC, a previous study found that PFS and OS were significantly longer in the CR/PR group than in the SD group.[3] However, such analysis has not been performed for patients with EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC. Although such patients have clinical features associated with a rapid and marked reduction in tumor size in response to EGFR-TKI treatment, the impact of such rapid and pronounced tumor shrinkage on survival outcome has remained unknown. We have therefore now evaluated PFS and OS according to response and tumor shrinkage pattern among EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We screened 145 consecutive patients with EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC who were treated with EGFR-TKIs between May 2003 and July 2012 at Kinki University Hospital or Kishiwada City Hospital. Criteria for use of a patient’s data included the provision of signed informed consent for EGFR mutation analysis, a diagnosis of stage IIIb or IV or recurrent NSCLC with a proven EGFR mutation, the presence of at least one tumor lesion that could be accurately measured by computed tomography according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1., and treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib. All patients were evaluated at least every 8 weeks until response confirmation by RECIST. Maximal tumor shrinkage was defined as the greatest tumor shrinkage achieved at any follow-up assessment. Time to response (TTR) was defined as the time from the start of treatment with an EGFR-TKI to the first objective tumor response (tumor shrinkage of ≥30%) observed for patients who achieved a CR or PR. OS and PFS were assessed from the first day of EGFR-TKI therapy to the date of death from any cause and the date of objective disease progression, respectively. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each study site.

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

Among 145 EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, 68 individuals were selected for analysis (Fig. 1). There were no substantial differences in patient characteristics between eligible (n = 68) and ineligible (n = 77) patients (Supplementary Table S1, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JTO/A497). Demographics of the eligible 68 patients are shown in Table 1. Fifty-seven (84%) of these individuals were treated with gefitinib and 11 (16%) with erlotinib. Fifty-two patients (76%) were women and 52 (76%) were never-smokers, with the median age of all patients being 69 years (range, 39–87). Sixty-seven patients (99%) had adenocarcinoma, and 59 (87%) had disease of stage IIIb or IV. Most patients (90%) had a good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 or 1), and 38 (56%) received EGFR-TKI treatment as first-line chemotherapy. With regard to the type of EGFR mutation, 34 patients (50%) had a deletion in exon 19, 31 (46%) had a missense mutation in exon 21 (L858R or L861Q), and three (4%) had a G719A mutation in exon 18.
FIGURE 1.

Flowchart of patient selection. EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor gene tyrosine kinase inhibitor; NSCLC, non–small-cell lung cancer.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the Enrolled NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations (n = 68)

Flowchart of patient selection. EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor gene tyrosine kinase inhibitor; NSCLC, non–small-cell lung cancer. Characteristics of the Enrolled NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations (n = 68)

Analysis of PFS and OS According to Response to EGFR-TKI Treatment

According to the RECIST criteria, six patients experienced a CR, 42 patients a PR, 14 patients SD, and six patients progressive disease (PD) (Table 1). The response rate (CR + PR) and disease control rate (CR + PR +SD) were thus 71% (48 of 68 patients) and 91% (62 of 68 patients), respectively. For the entire cohort, the median PFS was 11.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5–15.2) and the median OS was 24.9 months (95% CI, 8.8–40.9). Analysis of PFS according to response to EGFR-TKI treatment revealed a significant benefit for the CR/PR group compared with the SD group (median of 15.9 versus 8.5 months, p = 0.009) (Fig. 2A). Kaplan–Meier curves for OS also revealed a significant benefit for the CR/PR group compared with the SD group (median of 44.4 versus 12.2 months, p = 0.004) (Fig. 2B).
FIGURE 2.

Progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) for patients classified according to achievement of a CR or PR response versus stable disease SD. EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor gene tyrosine kinase inhibitor; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

Progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) for patients classified according to achievement of a CR or PR response versus stable disease SD. EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor gene tyrosine kinase inhibitor; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease. To rule out potential confounding interaction between response and other factors, we performed multivariate analysis for PFS and OS (Table 2). Response (CR or PR) to EGFR-TKI treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17–0.62; p = 0.001) and a favorable performance status (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10–0.65; p = 0.004) were significantly associated with PFS, whereas response (CR or PR) to EGFR-TKI treatment (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13–0.68; p = 0.004), a favorable performance status (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05–0.65; p = 0.008), and female sex (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06–0.79; p = 0.021) were significantly associated with OS. Other covariables (smoking history, age, EGFR genotype, and type of mutation) did not affect PFS or OS.
TABLE 2.

Multivariate Analysis for Survival after Initiation of EGFR-TKI Treatment in NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations (n = 68)

Multivariate Analysis for Survival after Initiation of EGFR-TKI Treatment in NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations (n = 68)

Relation of Maximal Tumor Shrinkage to PFS

Given that a response to EGFR-TKI treatment was found to be associated with a longer PFS and OS, we investigated the impact of a marked reduction in tumor size on survival outcome among patients who achieved a CR or PR. The maximal decrease in tumor size over time ranged from 30% to 100% for this group, with a median value of 56% (Fig. 3). No significant correlation was detected between maximal tumor shrinkage and PFS (R2 = 0.0008), however (Fig. 4A). We divided this group of patients into two subgroups according to maximal tumor shrinkage (low shrinkage, <56%; high shrinkage, ≥56%), but no trend toward a more favorable PFS (p = 0.87) (Fig. 4B) or OS (p = 0.55) (Fig. 4C) was apparent in the subset of patients who experienced a more pronounced change in tumor size in response to EGFR-TKI therapy.
FIGURE 3.

Waterfall plot of the maximal decrease in tumor size over time relative to the pretreatment baseline for individual patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene tyrosine kinase inhibitor who achieved a partial response or complete response. The median decrease of 56% was used to define patient subgroups characterized by low or high tumor shrinkage.

FIGURE 4.

Relation between survival and either maximal tumor shrinkage or time to response for patients treated with EGFR-TKIs who achieved a complete response or partial response. A, Correlation between maximal tumor shrinkage and PFS. Progression-free survival (B) and overall survival (C) according to the maximal tumor shrinkage (low shrinkage, <56%; high shrinkage, ≥56%). D, Correlation between time to response and progression-free survival. Progression-free survival (E) and overall survival (F) according to the time to response (long, >4.2 weeks; short, ≤4.2 weeks). EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor gene tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Waterfall plot of the maximal decrease in tumor size over time relative to the pretreatment baseline for individual patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene tyrosine kinase inhibitor who achieved a partial response or complete response. The median decrease of 56% was used to define patient subgroups characterized by low or high tumor shrinkage. Relation between survival and either maximal tumor shrinkage or time to response for patients treated with EGFR-TKIs who achieved a complete response or partial response. A, Correlation between maximal tumor shrinkage and PFS. Progression-free survival (B) and overall survival (C) according to the maximal tumor shrinkage (low shrinkage, <56%; high shrinkage, ≥56%). D, Correlation between time to response and progression-free survival. Progression-free survival (E) and overall survival (F) according to the time to response (long, >4.2 weeks; short, ≤4.2 weeks). EGFR-TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor gene tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

PFS According to TTR

We next investigated the impact of rapid tumor shrinkage, as reflected by TTR, on survival outcome among patients who achieved a CR or PR. The median TTR was 4.2 weeks (95% CI, 3.9–4.5), with most patients (97%) achieving a CR or PR within 2 months after initiation of EGFR-TKI treatment. No correlation was apparent between TTR and PFS (R2 = 0.0084; Fig. 4D). We divided this group of patients into two subgroups according to TTR (long TTR, >4.2 weeks; short TTR, ≤4.2 weeks), but there was no significant difference in PFS (p = 0.29; Fig. 4E) or OS (p = 0.58; Fig. 4F) between patients with a long or a short TTR.

DISCUSSION

EGFR-TKIs such as erlotinib and gefitinib are highly effective for the treatment of NSCLC patients harboring activating EGFR mutations.[4-7] The efficacy of EGFR-TKI treatment varies, however, even among EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC patients, with no studies to date having evaluated survival according to tumor response among such individuals. We have now shown that PFS and OS were significantly longer in such patients who achieved a CR or PR than in those who manifested SD. Multivariate analysis also revealed that a response (CR or PR) to EGFR-TKI treatment was associated with a longer PFS and OS, suggesting that response might represent the optimal surrogate for efficacy in patients with EGFR mutation–positive tumors treated with EGFR-TKIs. Although SD is a relatively more complex category than CR or PR, ranging from a minor decrease to a minor increase in tumor size, we found that most EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC patients who experienced SD with EGFR-TKI therapy showed some tumor shrinkage, ranging from 4% to 27% relative to baseline, and the median PFS in this group of patients was 8.5 months, which seems better than that of individuals who experienced SD among unselected NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.[3] Given that patients who achieved a CR or PR showed a significantly longer survival after EGFR-TKI treatment than did those who experienced SD in our study, SD might reflect an insufficient survival benefit for such treatment in EGFR mutation–positive patients. Further studies are therefore warranted to elucidate the molecular mechanism responsible for SD, with several candidates having been identified.[8-11] Analysis of pretreatment tumor specimens from NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations revealed that a high level of expression of hepatocyte growth factor, a ligand of the receptor tyrosine kinase MET, occurred more frequently in tumors with intrinsic EGFR-TKI resistance (SD or PD) than in sensitive tumors (PR or CR).[9] In addition, the T790M mutation of EGFR, which has been associated with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients harboring activating EGFR mutations, was recently shown to be present in some patients before treatment with EGFR-TKIs. Among EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, those with a de novo T790M mutation were found to have a significantly shorter PFS than were those without it.[10,11] New treatment strategies are thus needed to improve outcome for patients in whom these candidate mechanisms for SD are operative. Oncogene-addicted tumors have clinical features associated with rapid and marked tumor shrinkage after administration of a corresponding molecularly targeted drug. Such clinical features are considered to reflect early improved quality of life.[12,13] However, the impact of rapid and pronounced tumor shrinkage on survival outcome in EGFR-TKI–treated NSCLC patients who harbor an EGFR mutation and who show a CR or PR has remained unknown. We have now shown that neither the maximal extent of tumor shrinkage nor TTR was related to PFS or OS in such patients. Patients who harbor EGFR mutations eventually develop resistance to TKIs through the acquisition of additional genetic changes, such as the T790M mutation of EGFR or MET amplification. Our findings suggest that time to acquired resistance (disease progression) after initiation of EGFR-TKI therapy is defined by the duration of EGFR-TKI exposure, regardless of the time to onset of tumor response or the extent of tumor shrinkage. The limitations of the present study include a retrospective design and a relatively small number of patients. Although all patients enrolled for this analysis were evaluated at least every 8 weeks until response confirmation, they underwent computed tomographic imaging at different time points. In conclusion, response (CR or PR) may represent the optimal surrogate for survival among EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, our results suggest that the survival benefit of EGFR-TKI treatment in patients who achieve a CR or PR is not influenced by the pattern of tumor shrinkage.
  13 in total

1.  Continued gefitinib treatment after disease stabilisation prolongs survival of Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience.

Authors:  K Hotta; K Matsuo; H Ueoka; K Kiura; M Tabata; S Harita; K Gemba; T Yonei; A Bessho; M Tanimoto
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Health-related quality-of-life in a randomized phase III first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients from Asia with advanced NSCLC (IPASS).

Authors:  Sumitra Thongprasert; Emma Duffield; Nagahiro Saijo; Yi-Long Wu; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Da-Tong Chu; Meilin Liao; Yuh-Min Chen; Han-Pin Kuo; Shunichi Negoro; Kwok Chi Lam; Alison Armour; Patrick Magill; Masahiro Fukuoka
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Hepatocyte growth factor expression in EGFR mutant lung cancer with intrinsic and acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a Japanese cohort.

Authors:  Seiji Yano; Tadaaki Yamada; Shinji Takeuchi; Keisei Tachibana; Yuko Minami; Yasushi Yatabe; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Hidenori Tanaka; Tatsuo Kimura; Shinzoh Kudoh; Hiroshi Nokihara; Yuichiro Ohe; Jun Yokota; Hidetaka Uramoto; Kosei Yasumoto; Katsuyuki Kiura; Masahiko Higashiyama; Makoto Oda; Haruhiro Saito; Junji Yoshida; Kazuya Kondoh; Masayuki Noguchi
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR.

Authors:  Makoto Maemondo; Akira Inoue; Kunihiko Kobayashi; Shunichi Sugawara; Satoshi Oizumi; Hiroshi Isobe; Akihiko Gemma; Masao Harada; Hirohisa Yoshizawa; Ichiro Kinoshita; Yuka Fujita; Shoji Okinaga; Haruto Hirano; Kozo Yoshimori; Toshiyuki Harada; Takashi Ogura; Masahiro Ando; Hitoshi Miyazawa; Tomoaki Tanaka; Yasuo Saijo; Koichi Hagiwara; Satoshi Morita; Toshihiro Nukiwa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Satoshi Morita; Yasushi Yatabe; Shunichi Negoro; Isamu Okamoto; Junji Tsurutani; Takashi Seto; Miyako Satouchi; Hirohito Tada; Tomonori Hirashima; Kazuhiro Asami; Nobuyuki Katakami; Minoru Takada; Hiroshige Yoshioka; Kazuhiko Shibata; Shinzoh Kudoh; Eiji Shimizu; Hiroshi Saito; Shinichi Toyooka; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Masahiro Fukuoka
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  De novo resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR mutation-positive patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Masayuki Takeda; Isamu Okamoto; Yoshihiko Fujita; Tokuzo Arao; Hiroyuki Ito; Masahiro Fukuoka; Kazuto Nishio; Kazuhiko Nakagawa
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study.

Authors:  Caicun Zhou; Yi-Long Wu; Gongyan Chen; Jifeng Feng; Xiao-Qing Liu; Changli Wang; Shucai Zhang; Jie Wang; Songwen Zhou; Shengxiang Ren; Shun Lu; Li Zhang; Chengping Hu; Chunhong Hu; Yi Luo; Lei Chen; Ming Ye; Jianan Huang; Xiuyi Zhi; Yiping Zhang; Qingyu Xiu; Jun Ma; Li Zhang; Changxuan You
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Early response to platinum-based first-line chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer may predict survival.

Authors:  Bhawna Sirohi; Sue Ashley; Alison Norton; Sanjay Popat; Sarah Hughes; Panagiotous Papadopoulos; Kathryn Priest; Mary O'Brien
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Quality of life with gefitinib in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: quality of life analysis of North East Japan Study Group 002 Trial.

Authors:  Satoshi Oizumi; Kunihiko Kobayashi; Akira Inoue; Makoto Maemondo; Shunichi Sugawara; Hirohisa Yoshizawa; Hiroshi Isobe; Masao Harada; Ichiro Kinoshita; Shoji Okinaga; Terufumi Kato; Toshiyuki Harada; Akihiko Gemma; Yasuo Saijo; Yuki Yokomizo; Satoshi Morita; Koichi Hagiwara; Toshihiro Nukiwa
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-05-11

10.  Initial partial response and stable disease according to RECIST indicate similar survival for chemotherapeutical patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lijie He; Yuee Teng; Bo Jin; Mingfang Zhao; Ping Yu; Xuejun Hu; Jingdong Zhang; Songbai Li; Yaling Gao; Yunpeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Charles N Prabhakar
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04

2.  Early depth of tumor shrinkage and treatment outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer treated using Nivolumab.

Authors:  Hayato Kawachi; Daichi Fujimoto; Takeshi Morimoto; Kazutaka Hosoya; Yuki Sato; Mariko Kogo; Kazuma Nagata; Atsushi Nakagawa; Ryo Tachikawa; Keisuke Tomii
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Impact of Advantage in Tumor Response on the Correlation Between Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival: Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yosuke Yoshida; Masayuki Kaneko; Mamoru Narukawa
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2021-01-23

4.  Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor in A431 squamous cell carcinoma xenografts is mediated by c-Kit pathway transduction.

Authors:  Lixia Zhang; Xiaokun Yang; Bei Zhao; Zhen Cai
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-12-16

Review 5.  Imaging of Precision Therapy for Lung Cancer: Current State of the Art.

Authors:  Hyesun Park; Lynette M Sholl; Hiroto Hatabu; Mark M Awad; Mizuki Nishino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The relationship between preliminary efficacy and prognosis after first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Dongfang Chen; Tianqing Chu; Qing Chang; Yanwei Zhang; Liwen Xiong; Rong Qiao; Jiajun Teng; Baohui Han; Runbo Zhong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-05

7.  Comparison of CT volumetric measurement with RECIST response in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  S A Hayes; M C Pietanza; D O'Driscoll; J Zheng; C S Moskowitz; M G Kris; M S Ginsberg
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Getting out of a wheelchair: an uncommon insertion mutation in exon 19 of EGFR responsive to erlotinib.

Authors:  Abed Agbarya; Meira Melamed-Frank; Orit Kaidar-Person; Ilana Goldberg-Cohen; Haitam Nasrallah; Mira Wollner; Jair Bar; Gad Rennert; Flavio Lejbkowicz
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-09-09

9.  Drug resistance analysis of gefitinib-targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shuliang Liu; Hongji Yang; Xingping Ge; Lingfei Su; Aifeng Zhang; Liang Liang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  The prognostic value of CT radiomic features for patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Hyungjin Kim; Chang Min Park; Bhumsuk Keam; Sang Joon Park; Miso Kim; Tae Min Kim; Dong-Wan Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.