Given the increasing number of poorly soluble and thus poorly bioavailable active pharmaceutical materials, there is a demand for innovative formulation platforms for such molecules. Thus a focus on enhancing dissolution properties of poorly soluble drugs exists. Within this study, the spin coating of acetone solutions containing 5,5-diphenyl-2,4-imidazolidinedione (phenytoin) in various concentrations is evaluated. The results reveal strong variations of the morphology of deposited phenytoin crystals at silica surfaces. Individual separated particles are obtained on low phenytoin concentrations, and closely packed particular films form when the concentration is increased. As the material is isomorphic, these various morphologies have the same crystalline structure. Dissolution experiments reveal that both the apparent maximum solubility and as the dissolution rate are strongly enhanced compared to bulk powder, suggesting that formulation based on this preparative technique will allow overcoming the low solubility problematic for a variety of drugs.
Given the increasing number of poorly soluble and thus poorly bioavailable active pharmaceutical materials, there is a demand for innovative formulation platforms for such molecules. Thus a focus on enhancing dissolution properties of poorly soluble drugs exists. Within this study, the spin coating of acetone solutions containing 5,5-diphenyl-2,4-imidazolidinedione (phenytoin) in various concentrations is evaluated. The results reveal strong variations of the morphology of deposited phenytoin crystals at silica surfaces. Individual separated particles are obtained on low phenytoin concentrations, and closely packed particular films form when the concentration is increased. As the material is isomorphic, these various morphologies have the same crystalline structure. Dissolution experiments reveal that both the apparent maximum solubility and as the dissolution rate are strongly enhanced compared to bulk powder, suggesting that formulation based on this preparative technique will allow overcoming the low solubility problematic for a variety of drugs.
The therapeutic action of many newly developed
active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) or drug molecules is limited
to low aqueous solubility, and they belong therefore to the Biopharmaceutics
Classification System (BCS) class II or IV.[1] Enhanced solubility may be achieved by various approaches; for instance,
a reduction in particle size promotes dissolution and thus systemic
absorption.[2] However, precaution needs
to be taken as API nanoparticles are developed as these are able diffusing
through cell barriers causing cell malfunctions.[3] In addition the crystalline structure and the morphology
are important.[4] While amorphous solid states
are favorable in terms of solubility and dissolution rate, they often
lack on long time stability, resulting in undesired crystallization
on storage.[5] Thus, defined crystals are
preferable in solid state pharmaceutical formulations. Furthermore,
APIs are able to pack in various different crystalline arrangements
with each polymorph having a different long time stability[6] and physical-chemical[6b] and therapeutic properties.[6a]API
loaded surfaces provide an alternative for systemic absorption through
topical or buccal routes from patches[7] or
nanoparticle surfaces.[8] Surfaces made from
poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)[8] or cellulose[9] aid in the formulation
and help to transport the API to the specific side of actions (i.e.,
drug targeting).[10] Anyway, the usage of
such approaches requires deeper knowledge of API–surface interactions
for optimized drug formulations. For instance, at surfaces organic
molecule deposition from solutions may result in altered polymorphic
structures or morphologies compared to bulk crystallization within
solutions.[11]In this study the formation
of thin layers of a model API at a solid, flat glass substrate is
investigated. Such a model system provides the possibility to study
interactions with various surface sensitive methods like atomic force
microscope (AFM) and gracing incidence X-ray diffraction. Further
this simple model allows gaining information on important parameters
useful for application relevant to other systems including patches
or colloidal particles prepared in solutions or spray drying. The
API used is 5,5-diphenyl-2,4-imidazolidinedione (phenytoin). While
phenytoin is an anticonvulsive, antiepileptic, and antiarrhythmic
drug and is typically used in solid oral dosage forms (i.e., capsules
and chewable tablets) as well as in parenteral formulations, it is
chosen for this study as it is also known to be isomorphic. This means
that the molecules assemble in a unique crystalline phase which makes
it a perfect candidate for this study. Often changes in the preparation
route cause crystallization in other polymorphic structures which
hardens the understanding of the film formation as other polymorphic
structures results in other morphologies.[11a] Within this study films are prepared by a spin-casting technique[12] which is a fast and reproducible preparation
procedure. The variation of the API amount in the solutions and spin
parameter will show differences in the phenytoin assembling at a silica
surface. AFM and diffraction measurements are used to study the morphological
and crystallographic properties allowing elucidating changes in the
dissolution behavior.
Materials and Methods
Phenytoin
was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany)
and used without further treatment. Acetone (96%) was also purchased
from Sigma Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) in spectroscopic
grade.Standard microscopy glass slides (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany)
were cut in 2.5 × 2.5 cm2 pieces and cleaned in ethanol,
acetone, and a 0.1 M NaOH solution and dried under a nitrogen stream.
This results in a hydrophilic surface with a water contact angle of
35°. Acetone and phenytoin solutions have contact angles of <20°;
the low surface tension of acetone results in the liquid spreading
along the surface.Films were prepared via spin coating. The
spin coating experiments were performed by dropping 200 μL of
various concentrated acetone solutions onto the glass slides and subsequently
rotated at 25 rounds per second (rps) for 30 s around its surface
normal. This results in homogeneous structures forming over the entire
glass surface. All samples were stored under a vacuum of 10–6 mbar for 2 h at ambient temperatures prior the experiments to reduce
residuals of the solvent.AFM images were taken with a Nanosurf
Easyscan 2 machine in tapping mode. Tap190-Al cantilevers (Budgetsensors,
Sofia, Bulgaria) were used for all experiments. Data evaluation and
image processing was performed by the software package Gwyddeon.[13]Specular X-ray diffraction experiments
were performed with a Siemens 500D diffractometer in Bragg–Brentano
configuration. The copper radiation (wavelength λ = 0.154 nm)
was narrowed with primary and secondary side slit systems. The diffracted
intensity was guided toward a graphite monochromator and collected
by a scintillation counter. The angular measurement (2Θ) is
represented in the scattering vector (q) notation which calculates as q = 4π sin(Θ)/λ.[14]Grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD)
experiments were performed with a modified lab based Bruker D8 Discover.[15] The copper radiation is parallelized via a Goebell
mirror and defined by parallel plate collimators. The diffracted beam
is led trough a collimator system and is collected by a Vantech 1D
detector. The GIXD data were evaluated using the software package
PyGID.[16]The apparent solubility
(Cs) of bulk phenytoin and from spin-coated
samples was evaluated, and the content uniformity of prepared spin-coated
samples was determined using standard routines according to European
Pharmacopoeia V 7.0. Dissolution experiments, that is, the amount
of API dissolved over time of both samples, were conducted on a horizontal
shaker (IKA yellow line RS 10 control, IKA-Werke GmbH & Co. KG,
Germany) at 200 rpm and a temperature of 25 °C. The dissolution
experiments were setup by adding a phenytoin coated glass slide (i.e.,
94.02 ± 8.16 μg of phenytoin) or 4.7 mg of bulk material
into dissolution vessels, and 20 mL (spin-coated samples) or 1000
mL (bulk material), respectively, of Milli-Q-water was added. An aliquot
of 1 mL was withdrawn after defined times over 6 h. The concentration
was determined by UV–vis adsorption measurement at a wavelength
of 220 nm using a nanophotometer (Implen, Munich, Germany) and standard
quartz cuvettes (Hellma, Müllheim, Germany). For statistics,
four samples of each kind were investigated, and the standard deviation
was elucidated.
Results and Discussion
The variation
of phenytoin concentration within acetone solution results in the
formation of various morphologies at a glass surface as the solutions
are spin coated at a spin speed of 25 rps. In Figure 1 AFM height images of films deposited from 0.05 to 1.5 wt
% acetonic solutions are shown. At the lowest concentration of 0.05
wt % separated islands of phenytoin are present. The islands (bright
areas in the image) consist of small spot like structures which are
connected by flat areas. A mean thickness of about 30 nm is observed
for the islands. In between adjacent islands (dark areas) no material
could be identified; thus a layer that fully covers the substrate
is absent. At a slightly increased concentration of 0.1 wt % again
separated structures are observed (see Figure 1b). Anyway the morphology has drastically changed. Large drop-like
particles are distributed over the entire film. The particles have
a height of about 70 nm and are a result of the solution favoring
dewetting from the silica surface. Besides these particles elongated
needle like structures are visible which correspond to the typical
structure observed on slow solvent removal (data will be shown elsewhere).
These needles have an extension of up to 6 μm. A height of 40
nm shows that these structures are significantly lower compared to
the drop like particles, suggesting that this morphology stronger
interacts with the surface; thus a rod-like growth along the surface
is present.
Figure 1
AFM height images of phenytoin films spin coated from 0.05 wt %
(a), 0.1 wt % (b), 0.5 wt % (c), 1 wt % (d), and 1.5 wt % (e1). e2 is a higher resolution image of e1. The
color scale is chosen individually for clarity.
AFM height images of phenytoin films spin coated from 0.05 wt %
(a), 0.1 wt % (b), 0.5 wt % (c), 1 wt % (d), and 1.5 wt % (e1). e2 is a higher resolution image of e1. The
color scale is chosen individually for clarity.Increasing the concentration further results in a phenytoin
“network” being present on the silica surface. Elongated
structures run over several tens of micrometers along the surface.
A width of 3.3 μm and height of 240 nm can be deduced from the
AFM image (Figure 1c). At the connection points
of these structures larger islands form. Such structures are typical
for materials trying to dewet the surface, but as sufficient material
is present interconnections develop during drying.At a concentration
of 1 wt % the gaps in between the elongated structures start to fill
resulting in a 90 nm thick film with nearly full coverage but with
remaining holes (see Figure 1d). However, increasing
the concentration to 1.5 wt % results in a film that entirely covers
the glass substrate (see Figure 1e1). Surprisingly, the AFM height image reveals a tree-ring like structure
with concentric rings forming around a common center. A high resolution
image reveals that this tree-like structures are a result of small
particles packing together (Figure 1e2); thus the tree-like rings form on account of particle packing during
solvent removal. Furthermore the results suggest that various phenytoin
nuclei rapidly form during the spinning process, which then assemble
in this observed tree-like structure.All samples shown in Figure 1 were prepared at the same spin speed of 25 rps.
At low concentrations dewetting structures are observed. Typically,
such structures are a result of the molecules at the API–glass
interface disfavoring their contact;[17] that
is, the adhesive forces are smaller than the cohesive forces which
results from the difference in their polar and apolar interaction
sides. Phenytoin is a highly hydrophobic molecule, while glass is
hydrophilic which results in a disjoining force and thus in dewetting.[17] Within very thin films the interface is the
dominating factor. Anyway, as the film thickness increases, the balance
of short-range (e.g., double layer forces) and long-range forces (e.g.,
van der Waals forces) is changed. As a result, the film stabilizes,
and a homogeneous layer without holes results.[18] In the case of phenytoin deposited from a 1.5 wt % acetone
solution at 25 rps, a fully closed layer with a thickness of 121 nm
forms.The variation of the solution concentration has a drastic
effect on the film morphology. Anyway, the variation of the spin speed
also strongly affects the morphology. In Figure 2 the AFM images of phenytoin thin films prepared by various spin
speeds from the same 1.5 wt % aceton solution are shown. At a spin
speed of 10 rps the resulting film covers the entire glass slide.
The morphology shows again various tree-ring like structures with
centers around the middle and in the right up corner of the image
(see Figure 2a). Compared to the structure
observed at 25 rps the number of rings and the packing density are
increased (compare Figure 1e and Figure 2a).The corresponding high resolution image reveals
that the structure results from particles packing closely together
but with the particle size being increased compared to samples spin-coated
at 25 rps. The situation remains similar for samples which are prepared
at 50 rps (see Figure 2b), but the particle
size is reduced compared to the other two samples.
Figure 2
AFM height images of
phenytoin thin films spin-cast at rotation speeds of 10 rps (a), 50
rps (b), and 100 rps (c). The right hand row shows the same samples
at a higher resolution.
AFM height images of
phenytoin thin films spin-cast at rotation speeds of 10 rps (a), 50
rps (b), and 100 rps (c). The right hand row shows the same samples
at a higher resolution.Spin-casting of the film at a rotation speed of 100 rps results
in a strong deviation of the morphology (see Figure 2c). Other than the previous films, clear dewetting structures
with large areas remaining uncovered are present (e.g., left top corner).
In addition small holes in the film are noticeable as dark spots within
Figure 2c and c1. The morphology
of the particles is slightly more elongated compared to the sample
prepared at a spin speed of 50 rps.For a quantitative evaluation
of the surface properties on the variation of the rotation speed,
the layer thickness (d), the root-mean-square roughness
(σrms), and the power spectral density (PSD) were
evaluated. The data are summarized in Table 1. For the film prepared at a spin speed of 10 rps d = 159 nm and σrms = 17.5 nm are obtained. As the
spin speed is increased to 25 rps, d reduces to 121
nm as well as the σrms reduces to 16.2 nm. For the
50 and 100 rps samples d = 54 and 45 nm, respectively,
are obtained. The corresponding σrms reduces to 12.0
and 8.6 nm. Thus the increase of the rps results in a decreasing thickness
and roughness.
Table 1
Summary of the Extracted Parameters
of the Spin-Cast Phenytoin Film at Various Speedsa
sp-sp,
spin speed; d, layer thickness; σrms, root-mean-square roughness; C, correlation length.The power spectral density
of the various samples, calculated from Figure 2a1–2c1, are summarized
in Figure 3. Within such an evaluation common
distances on a surface are extractable.[19] For the sample prepared at 10 rps a high spectral density is observed
for small wave vectors (k). As k is increased, the density drops from the plateau and reaches the
background level above 0.2 nm–1. For the evaluation
of common distances, linear regression fits in the plateau, and the
linear decreasing regions are performed (lines in Figure 3). The intersection point of the lines typically
describes a correlation length (C) (or common distance),
which calculates as C = 2π/k. The 10 rps sample reveals a real space correlation of 570 nm which
agrees well with the mean particle sizes observed in Figure 2a1. The same evaluation of the 25 rps
and 50 rps samples reveals a very similar behavior but with the correlation
“drop off” shifting to larger wave vectors; a real space
correlation length of 398 and 363 nm is obtained for the 25 and 50
rps, respectively. Thus the increase in spin speed does not only decrease
the layer thickness but also decreases the particle size. The PSD
spectrum of the 100 rps is distinct from the previous samples. The
curve reveals the presence of two correlation lengths. The first is
at low k = 0.0028 nm–1 (corresponding
to a real space distance of 2.2 μm), and a second is present
at a higher wavevector of 0.021 nm–1 (real space
distance of 311 nm). Inspecting the AFM image shows that the large
correlation length is due to the holes within the sample; that is,
the holes have a mean separation of 2.2 μm. The 311 nm correlation
is due to common particle size which are smaller compared to the previous
samples.
Figure 3
Power spectral density spectra for samples prepared from the 1.5
wt % solution deposited at various spin speeds. Symbols denote the
experimental data and lines linear fits to the regions. Curves are
shifted for clarity.
Power spectral density spectra for samples prepared from the 1.5
wt % solution deposited at various spin speeds. Symbols denote the
experimental data and lines linear fits to the regions. Curves are
shifted for clarity.The determined particle sizes for all samples have lateral
extensions which are larger than the film height. From this follows
that the films consist of small cylinder like particles with an aspect
ratio (lateral size/film thickness) of 3.5 for the thickest film and
increases to 6.6 for the thinnest film. This means that particles
forming during the spin coating process become more “flake
like” as the spin speed is increased.The AFM images
reveal the formation of particular films on the spin coating process.
Depending on the spin speed, the particles and the surface morphology
change. Typically, spinning at a low speed means that the system has
more time to assemble until the solvent is evaporated. During the
solvent evaporation, supersaturation takes place, resulting in phenytoin
nucleation, and these initial nuclei grow into larger crystallites
until the entire acetone is vanished from the sample. At larger rotation
speeds the initial solution gets spin off faster from the surface.
In addition the evaporation of the acetone is enhanced. As a result
the layer thickness is reduced and is composed of an increased number
but smaller crystallites compared to “slower prepared”
samples. At the fastest speed investigated, that is, 100 rps, the
particles are not able to entirely wet the surface. Often liquids
form dewetting structures at solid surfaces. These structures may
assist in the movement of already formed particles as well as the
dissolved molecules along certain channels within the surface; thus
the observed dewetting structures form.For the characterization
of the crystalline structure of the phenytoin films, X-ray diffraction
experiments are performed, and the results for the 1.5 wt % at 25
rps spin coated samples are shown in Figure 4, for example. To our knowledge there exists only one polymorphic
modification of phenytoin in literature;[20] the phenytoin molecules pack in a tetragonal unit cell with a = 0.62 nm, b = 1.36 nm, and c = 1.55 nm which reveal a calculated powder pattern demonstrated
in Figure 4. Within the experimental scan of
the thin film, only one peak at 8.09 nm–1 is present
belonging to the 002 Bragg reflection of the crystalline phase. (The
broad amorphous hump results from the underlying glass substrate).
Within a specular scan, only net planes which are parallel to the
substrate surface are detectable; thus it follows that the sample
shows a preferred alignment (texture) with respect of the surface.[21] Anyway, GIXD measurements result in a slightly
different conclusion (see Figure 5a,b). In
such a scan net planes which are parallel (or close to) to the surface
normal are investigated.[14] The GIXD pattern
reveals high intensity spots (highlighted by white X’s in Figure 3b) and are a result of Bragg reflection of certain
Miller’s indices (hkl’s). Using the
information of the unit cell shows that these hkl’s are a result of phenytoin assembling in a 001 texture in
accordance with the specular scan. However, ring-like structures are
also noted. Such rings are a result of random orientations of the
crystallites or powder like behavior; that is, within an ideal powder,
no preferred orientation exists. From this follows that fractions
of the crystallites adapt a random conformation with respect of the
surface. As the film is thin (only 121 nm), the amount of random particles
is probably very low, which causes an absence of Bragg peaks in the
specular scan. Within a powder sample all Bragg reflections which
have sufficient intensity should be visible, as observed for the as-delivered
powder sample investigated in Figure 4.
Figure 4
Specular X-ray
diffraction scan of the phenytoin sample prepared from 1.5 wt % actone
solution at a spin speed of 25 rps (top), experimental powder diffraction
measurement of the as-delivered powder (middle), and the calculation
of an ideal powder (bottom).[20] Curves are
shifted for clarity.
Figure 5
GIXD pattern of the phenytoin sample prepared from 1.5 wt % solution
and spin coated at 25 rps (a). Dashed box indicates the area over
which the pattern is integrated to generate a line scan (b). Part
c shows the molecular packing within the unit cell.
Specular X-ray
diffraction scan of the phenytoin sample prepared from 1.5 wt % actone
solution at a spin speed of 25 rps (top), experimental powder diffraction
measurement of the as-delivered powder (middle), and the calculation
of an ideal powder (bottom).[20] Curves are
shifted for clarity.GIXD pattern of the phenytoin sample prepared from 1.5 wt % solution
and spin coated at 25 rps (a). Dashed box indicates the area over
which the pattern is integrated to generate a line scan (b). Part
c shows the molecular packing within the unit cell.GIXD is a very surface sensitive technique allowing
order[22] and disorder[23] within films as thin as monolayers to be determined. As
there is no indication of an amorphous hump within the GIXD pattern,
this means that the film consists solely of crystalline phenytoin.In Figure 5c the packing of the molecules
viewed along the crystal a-axis is shown. In such
a representation the 001 net-planes are parallel to the crystal b-axis, or in other words the a- and b-axis are in contact with the glass surface. The phenytoin
molecules consist of two phenyl rings and an imidazolidin ring. All
rings are twisted with respect to each other, whereby the imidazolidin
ring runs along the crystal a-axis. Furthermore the
imidazolidin ring adapts a position at which the terminal oxygen is
in contact with the glass surface within a 001 textured growth. As
glass surfaces typically have highly polar and/or hydrogen bonding
sites, this contact is favored, and as a result the 001 orientation
is preferentially obtained. Anyway, the additional powder characteristic
is most likely a consequence of fast removal of acetone during the
spin-casting process; the API concentration rapidly increases resulting
in the formation of various nuclei simultaneously. For nuclei close
to the surface interaction are sufficient to achieve a preferred orientational
growth. For nuclei further off the surface an adaption with respect
of the surface is not present; thus the “bulk” crystalline
particles adapt a random orientation.Comparing the GIXD line
scans pattern of the thin film sample with the powder pattern of the
as-delivered material reveals an excellent agreement of the peak positions
(compare Figure 4 middle and Figure 5b). Variations in the peak heights are a result
from varying texture being present within both samples resulting in
enhancing or decreasing Bragg peak intensities. Additionally, these
results are in excellent agreement with a calculated powder pattern
(Figure 4 bottom).[20] From this follows that the preparation route via spin coating does
not influence the crystallographic properties of phenytoin, that is,
an incorporation of acetone within the thin film is very unlikely,
and the same polymorph forms.For the evaluation of the solubility
properties of phenytoin deposited on the glass surface dissolution
profiles are determined, i.e. the increase in solute concentration
over time (see Figure 6). Milli-Q water was
chosen as dissolution media as it minimizes the impact of surface
affine species within other dissolution media (e.g., salts) onto the
particle removal from the surface. At a short period of time (5 min)
a concentration of 1.5 ± 0.1 μg/mL is already obtained.
As time progresses the concentration increases linearly and reaches
a value of 3.1 ± 0.1 μg/mL after 30 min. At this point
the increase in solution concentration with time is slowed down. It
took another five and a half hours to reach a value of 3.5 ±
0.3 μg/mL.
Figure 6
Phenytoin concentration as a function of time for thin
films samples and the as-purchased powder.
Phenytoin concentration as a function of time for thin
films samples and the as-purchased powder.Additionally, dissolution studies of bulk phenytoin were
conducted for sake of classification, that is, if the spinning process
results in improved dissolution properties. The dissolution studies
were performed under same conditions (i.e., same amount of API relative
to dissolution-media volume, temperature, same apparatus, same parameters)
to make results comparable. As shown in Figure 6 (bottom curve), API release of bulk phenytoin is noticeable after
30 min at which a concentration of 0.5 ± 0.1 μg/mL is determined.
(API concentrations prior 30 min were under the detection limit of
the experimental setup.) From this point, a linear increase in drug
concentration is observed, and at 1 h a concentration of 1.3 ±
0.2 μg/mL is reached. After 1 h the increase in API concentration
is slowed down. At 6 h a solution concentration of 2.5 ± 0.5
μg/mL is measured.Within the dissolution experiments
the amount of phenytoin dissolved from the thin spin-cast sample is
significantly higher at all times compared to the bulk powder sample.
Furthermore, the spin-cast sample reveals a rapid dissolution at the
very beginning with most of the phenytoin being dissolved. In contrast
the dissolution of the bulk material after this time was just initiated.
Basically, thin films of phenytoin crystals exhibit an improved solubility
behavior with higher and faster dissolution rate due to higher specific
surface area of the smaller particles being available for dissolution
media. The bulk phenytoin shows a particle size distribution of d0.9 = 25.0 μm, d0.5 = 14.1 μm, and a d0.1 = 7.7 μm whereby the AFM height images reveal crystal sizes
around 400 nm. The smaller particle size also affects the maximum
apparent solubility of both. It was observed that twice as much phenytoin
could be dissolved when prepared as thin film (i.e., 23.6 ± 0.6
μg/mL) compared to untreated bulk phenytoin (i.e.,11.5 ±
0.5 μg/mL).
Conclusion
By varying the spin coating
process the film appearance as well as the local morphology (shape
and size) of phenytoin could be manipulated. The results show that
the API crystallizes fast on the removal of the solvent and particles
form whereby the size can be manipulated by the spin speed. Furthermore
the variation of solution concentration reveals morphologies that
varied from separated islands to extended dewetting structures and
finally fully closed layers. The dissolution properties of films prepared
by spin coating technique are significantly improved compared to those
of the bulk powder. This gives confidence that the other system including
multilayer application forms may be improved as well by the usage
of this approach.
Authors: Jonathan M Miller; Benjamin M Collman; Landon R Greene; David J W Grant; Anthony C Blackburn Journal: Pharm Dev Technol Date: 2005 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Michael Dohr; Oliver Werzer; Quan Shen; Ingo Salzmann; Christian Teichert; Christian Ruzié; Guillaume Schweicher; Yves Henri Geerts; Michele Sferrazza; Roland Resel Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: Heike M A Ehmann; Ramona Baumgartner; Daniela Reischl; Eva Roblegg; Andreas Zimmer; Roland Resel; Oliver Werzer Journal: Cryst Growth Des Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 4.076
Authors: Paul Christian; Christian Röthel; Martin Tazreiter; Andreas Zimmer; Ingo Salzmann; Roland Resel; Oliver Werzer Journal: Cryst Growth Des Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 4.076
Authors: Paul Christian; Stephan Tumphart; Heike M A Ehmann; Hans Riegler; Anna Maria Coclite; Oliver Werzer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Daniela Reischl; Christian Röthel; Paul Christian; Eva Roblegg; Heike M A Ehmann; Ingo Salzmann; Oliver Werzer Journal: Cryst Growth Des Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 4.076
Authors: Heike M A Ehmann; Ramona Baumgartner; Birgit Kunert; Andreas Zimmer; Eva Roblegg; Oliver Werzer Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Roland Resel; Markus Bainschab; Alexander Pichler; Theo Dingemans; Clemens Simbrunner; Julian Stangl; Ingo Salzmann Journal: J Synchrotron Radiat Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 2.616