| Literature DB >> 24416230 |
Yuan-Chin Hsiung1, Jun-Jen Liu2, Yu-Chen Hou3, Chiu-Li Yeh4, Sung-Ling Yeh1.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of dietary glutamine (Gln) on T-helper (Th) and T regulatory (Treg) cell homeostasis and colonic inflammatory mediator expression in mice with dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis. Mice were randomly assigned to 4 groups with 2 normal control (C and G) and 2 DSS-treated groups (DC and DG). The C and DC groups were fed a common semipurified diet, while the G and DG groups received an identical diet except that part of the casein was replaced by Gln, which provided 25% of the total amino acid nitrogen. Mice were fed the diets for 10 days. On day 6, mice in the normal control groups were given distilled water, while those in the DSS groups were given distilled water containing 1.5% DSS for 5 d. At the end of the experiment, the mice were sacrificed for further examination. Results showed that DC group had higher plasma haptoglobin, colonic weight, immunoglobulin G, inflammatory cytokine and nuclear factor (NF)-κB protein levels. Gln administration lowered inflammatory mediators and NF-κB/IκBα ratio in colitis. Compared with the DC group, the percentages of interleukin-17F and interferon-γ in blood and transcription factors, T-bet and RAR-related orphan receptor-γt, gene expressions in mesenteric lymph nodes were lower, whereas blood Foxp3 was higher in the DG group. Also, DG group had lower colon injury score. These results suggest that Gln administration suppressed Th1/Th17 and Th-associated cytokine expressions and upregulated the expression of Tregs, which may modulate the balance of Th/Treg and reduce inflammatory reactions in DSS-induced colitis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24416230 PMCID: PMC3887000 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Composition of the experimental diets (g/kg).
| Component | Control diet | Glutamine diet |
| Soybean oil | 100 | 100 |
| Casein | 200 | 150 |
| Glutamine | 0 | 41.7 |
| Salt mixture | 35 | 35 |
| Vitamin mixture | 10 | 10 |
| Methyl cellulose | 31 | 31 |
| Choline bitartrate | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Methionine | 3 | 3 |
| Corn starch | 626.8 | 618.5 |
The salt mixture contained the following (mg/g): calcium phosphate dibasic, 500; sodium chloride, 74; potassium sulfate, 52; potassium citrate monohydrate, 20; magnesium oxide, 24; manganese carbonate, 3.5; ferric citrate, 6; zinc carbonate, 1.6; curpric carbonate, 0.3; potassium iodate, 0.01; sodium selenite, 0.01; and chromium potassium sulfate, 0.55.
The vitamin mixture contained the following (mg/g): thiamin hydrochloride, 0.6; riboflavin, 0.6; pyridoxine hydrochloride, 0.7; nicotinic acid, 3; calcium pantothenate, 1.6; D-biotin, 0.05; cyanocobalamin, 0.001; retinyl palmitate, 1.6; DL-α-tocopherol acetate, 20; cholecalciferol, 0.25; and menaquinone, 0.005.
Sequences of oligonucleotide primers used in the PCR amplification.
| Gene | Primer sequences (5′ to 3′) |
| T-bet | F: |
| R: | |
| GATA-3 | F: |
| R: | |
| RORγt | F: |
| R: | |
| AhR | F: |
| R: | |
| Foxp3 | F: |
| R: | |
| Muc2 | F: |
| R: | |
| Tff3 | F: |
| R: | |
| Hsp72 | F: |
| R: | |
| Bcl-xL | F: |
| R: | |
| 18 s | F: |
| R: |
T-bet, T-box expressed in T cells; ROR-γt, RAR-related orphan receptor gamma t; AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; Foxp3, forhead box p 3.
Histological score of colitis.
| Feature | Score | Description |
| Loss of epithelium | 0 | None |
| 1 | 0%∼25% loss of epithelium | |
| 2 | 26%∼50% loss of epithelium | |
| 3 | >50% loss of epithelium | |
| Length of crypts | 0 | None to length of crypts 85% normal thickness |
| 1 | Length of crypts 85%∼70% normal thickness | |
| 2 | Length of crypts 70%∼50% normal thickness | |
| 3 | Length of crypts <50% normal thickness | |
| Infiltration of leukocytes | 0 | None |
| 1 | Mild | |
| 2 | Moderate | |
| 3 | Severe |
Colonic length and weight, and immunoglobulin (Ig) levels in lavage fluid and haptoglobin concentrations in plasma of experimental mice.
| C | G | DC | DG | |
| Colon | ||||
| Length (cm) | 5.76±0.40 | 5.53±0.32 | 4.63±0.69 | 4.95±0.49 |
| Weight (g) | 0.23±0.03 | 0.26±0.04 | 0.30±0.04 | 0.26±0.05 |
| IgA (µg/mg protein) | 15.01±0.06 | 15.02±0.06 | 17.18±0.54 | 16.85±0.52 |
| IgG (µg/mg protein) | 20.53±2.77 | 17.00±4.38 | 105.53±4.17 | 41.23±6.44 |
| MCP-1 (pg/ml) | 60.30±1.48 | 63.62±1.17 | 102.6±2.70 | 74.06±0.68 |
| TNF-α (pg/ml) | 43.52±0.71 | 41.85±0.16 | 61.70±1.01 | 48.38±1.44 |
| Plasma | ||||
| Haptoglobin (µg/ml) | 14.43±0.14 | 15.31±0.42 | 121.21±8.50 | 40.87±1.8 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences among groups were analyzed by ANOVA using Tukey's test.
Significantly differs from the C group.
# Significantly differs from the DG group (p<0.05).
Figure 1Percentage of Th1/Th2 cell subpopulations in the blood.
Lymphocytes were gated according to their size and granularity using light scatter detectors (FSC/SSC). CD4-positive lymphocytes were considered Th cells and were gated to determine the expression of intracellular cytokines. A, B: Percentages of interferon (IFN)-γ- and interleukin (IL)-4-expressing CD4+ lymphocytes. C: IFN-γ/IL-4 ratio. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Differences among groups were analyzed by ANOVA using the Tukey's test. *Significantly differs from the C group. #Significantly differs from the DG group (p<0.05).
Figure 2Percentages of Th17/Th22-associated cytokine-producing cell and Treg cell populations in the blood.
CD4-positive lymphocytes were gated to analyze intracellular cytokine expressions by flow cytometry. A: Expression of intracellular interleukin (IL)-17A. B: Expression of intracellular IL-17F. C: Triple expression of intracellular IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22. D: IL-22+ and IL-17A−Th cells. E: Percentage of Treg cells. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Differences among groups were analyzed by an ANOVA using Tukey's test. *Significantly differs from the C group. #Significantly differs from the DG group (p<0.05).
Figure 3Transcription factor gene expressions of A) T-bet, B) GATA-3, C) ROR-γt, D) the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), and E) forhead box p3 (Foxp3) in mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) were analyzed by a real-time PCR.
Quantitation of mRNA changes was calculated by the comparative CT (2−ΔΔCt) method, and the mRNA expression of C mice was used as a calibrator. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. *Significantly differs from the C group. # Significantly differs from the DG group (p<0.05).
Figure 4mRNA expressions of mucosal recovery-related and antiapoptotic genes in colon tissues.
mRNA levels were analyzed by a real-time PCR. A: Expression of Muc2 mRNA. B: Expression of Tff3 mRNA. C: Expression of Hsp72 mRNA. D: Expression of Bcl-xL mRNA. Quantitation of mRNA changes was calculated by the comparative CT (2−ΔΔCt) method, and mRNA expression of C mice was used as a calibrator. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. *Significantly differs from the C group. #Significantly differs from the DG group (P<0.05).
Figure 5Protein levels of nuclear factor (NF)-κB p65 and inhibitory factor κBα (IκBα) in colon tissues.
a Protein expressions of NF-κB p65 and IκBα. Whole-tissue lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting, and b-actin was used as a loading control. b Densitometric analysis of the blot corrected by the protein loading control. c The ratio of NF-κB p65 to IκBα. Results of the densitometric analysis are shown as the mean ± SEM. *Significantly differs from the C group. #Significantly differs from the DG group (P<0.05).
Figure 6Protein levels of PARP and cleaved PARP in colon tissues.
A: protein expressions of PARP and cleaved PARP. Whole-tissue lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting, and β-actin was used as a loading control. B: densitometric analysis of the blot corrected by the protein loading control. Results of the densitometric analysis are shown as the mean ± SEM. *Significantly differs from the C group. #Significantly differs from the DG group (P<0.05).
Figure 7Histopathology of colon tissues.
A: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of colon tissues from mice in the C, G, DC, and DG groups. B: Histological scores of colitis. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM., which were determined as described in “Materials and Methods.” Differences among groups were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA using Tukey's test. *Significantly differs from the C group. #Significantly differs from the DG group (p<0.05).