Rakib U Rayhan1, Yin Zheng2, Ebsan Uddin1, Christian Timbol1, Oluwatoyin Adewuyi1, James N Baraniuk1. 1. Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center Room 3004F, 3rd Floor PHC Building, 3800 Reservoir Road, NW Washington, DC 20007-2197. 2. University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine. 12901 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard MDC 32. Tampa, FL 33612-4799.
Abstract
AIM: Questionnaires are an invaluable resource for clinical trials. They serve to estimate disease burden and clinical parameters associated with a particular study. However, current researchers are tackling budget constraints, loss of funding opportunities, and rise of research associated fees. We aimed at exploring alternative avenues taking advantage of the free Google docs software for questionnaire administration. This presents an opportunity to reduce costs while simultaneously increasing efficiency and data fidelity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Google documents were used as a platform to create online questionnaires that were automatically hosted via a unique URL. Password protected access to the URL link and a unique study ID gave patients around the clock access from anywhere in the world. Unique study ID ensured confidentially of all self-reported data. Patient responses were secured using a "Cloud" database where the data was automatically sorted, scaled and scored by custom Excel formulas. Researchers downloaded real-time questionnaire responses in multiple formats (e.g. excel) which was then analyzed with a statistical software of choice. RESULTS: This simple workflow provided instant questionnaire scores that eliminated the use for paper-based responses and subsequent manual entry of data. Ease of access to online questionnaires provided convenience to patients leading to better response rates and increase in data fidelity. The system also allowed for real time monitoring of patient's progress on completing questionnaires. Online questionnaires had 100% completion rate compared to paper-based questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Google docs can serve as an efficient and free platform to administer questionnaires to a clinical population without sacrificing quality, security, and fidelity of data.
AIM: Questionnaires are an invaluable resource for clinical trials. They serve to estimate disease burden and clinical parameters associated with a particular study. However, current researchers are tackling budget constraints, loss of funding opportunities, and rise of research associated fees. We aimed at exploring alternative avenues taking advantage of the free Google docs software for questionnaire administration. This presents an opportunity to reduce costs while simultaneously increasing efficiency and data fidelity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Google documents were used as a platform to create online questionnaires that were automatically hosted via a unique URL. Password protected access to the URL link and a unique study ID gave patients around the clock access from anywhere in the world. Unique study ID ensured confidentially of all self-reported data. Patient responses were secured using a "Cloud" database where the data was automatically sorted, scaled and scored by custom Excel formulas. Researchers downloaded real-time questionnaire responses in multiple formats (e.g. excel) which was then analyzed with a statistical software of choice. RESULTS: This simple workflow provided instant questionnaire scores that eliminated the use for paper-based responses and subsequent manual entry of data. Ease of access to online questionnaires provided convenience to patients leading to better response rates and increase in data fidelity. The system also allowed for real time monitoring of patient's progress on completing questionnaires. Online questionnaires had 100% completion rate compared to paper-based questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Google docs can serve as an efficient and free platform to administer questionnaires to a clinical population without sacrificing quality, security, and fidelity of data.
Entities:
Keywords:
Applied Informatics; Clinical outcomes; Google Docs; Online Questionnaires; Research Study
Authors: Andrew J Cook; David A Roberts; Michael D Henderson; Lisa C Van Winkle; Dania C Chastain; Robin J Hamill-Ruth Journal: Pain Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: James N Baraniuk; Oluwatoyin Adewuyi; Samantha Jean Merck; Mushtaq Ali; Murugan K Ravindran; Christian R Timbol; Rakib Rayhan; Yin Zheng; Uyenphuong Le; Rania Esteitie; Kristina N Petrie Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2013-01-21 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Nina N Harke; Christian Wagner; Robert M Hermann; Boris A Hadaschik; Jan Philipp Radtke; Alev Altay-Langguth; Stefan Aufderklamm; Christian Bach; Martina Becker-Schiebe; Andreas Blana; Frank Bruns; Stephan Buse; Stephanie E Combs; Christina L Engels; Emad Ezzibdeh; Marcel Fiedler; Laura-Anna Fischer; Mahmoud Farzat; Alexander Frismann; Matthias M Heck; Christoph Henkenberens; Marie C Roesch; Christoph Käding; Gunther Klautke; Philipp Krausewitz; Markus A Kuczyk; Conrad Leitsmann; Sebastian Lettmaier; Samy Mahjoub; Andreas Manseck; Daniel Medenwald; Andreas Meyer; Oliver Micke; Rudolf Moritz; Marcel Ott; Inga Peters; Sasa Pokupic; Daniel Porres; Felix Preisser; Kathrin Reichel; Andreas Schneider; Christian Schwentner; Sergiu Scobioala; Michael Truss; Daniel Wegener; Felix Wezel; Kay Willborn; Jörn H Witt; Andrea Wittig; Michael Wittlinger; Hendrik A Wolff; Volker Zimmermanns; Hans Christiansen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Maha M AlRasheed; Abdullah M Alsugair; Hala F Almarzouqi; Gadah K Alonazi; Fadilah S Aleanizy; Fulwah Y Alqahtani; Gamal A Shazly; Fowad Khurshid Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-04-28
Authors: Nina N Harke; Jan P Radtke; Boris A Hadaschik; Christian Bach; Frank P Berger; Andreas Blana; Hendrik Borgmann; Florian A Distler; Sebastian Edeling; Tobias Egner; Christina L Engels; Mahmoud Farzat; Alexander Haese; Rainer Hein; Markus A Kuczyk; Andreas Manseck; Rudolf Moritz; Michael Musch; Inga Peters; Sasa Pokupic; Bernardo Rocco; Andreas Schneider; André Schumann; Christian Schwentner; Chiara M Sighinolfi; Stephan Buse; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Michael C Truß; Michael Waldner; Christian Wülfing; Volker Zimmermanns; Jörn H Witt; Christian Wagner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 3.240