Literature DB >> 24415806

Hydraulic Conductivity Fields: Gaussian or Not?

Mark M Meerschaert1, Mine Dogan1, Remke L Van Dam1, David W Hyndman1, David A Benson2.   

Abstract

Hydraulic conductivity (K) fields are used to parameterize groundwater flow and transport models. Numerical simulations require a detailed representation of the K field, synthesized to interpolate between available data. Several recent studies introduced high resolution K data (HRK) at the Macro Dispersion Experiment (MADE) site, and used ground-penetrating radar (GPR) to delineate the main structural features of the aquifer. This paper describes a statistical analysis of these data, and the implications for K field modeling in alluvial aquifers. Two striking observations have emerged from this analysis. The first is that a simple fractional difference filter can have a profound effect on data histograms, organizing non-Gaussian ln K data into a coherent distribution. The second is that using GPR facies allows us to reproduce the significantly non-Gaussian shape seen in real HRK data profiles, using a simulated Gaussian ln K field in each facies. This illuminates a current controversy in the literature, between those who favor Gaussian ln K models, and those who observe non-Gaussian ln K fields. Both camps are correct, but at different scales.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24415806      PMCID: PMC3885184          DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Resour Res        ISSN: 0043-1397            Impact factor:   5.240


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of solute transport in flow fields influenced by preferential flowpaths at the decimeter scale.

Authors:  Chunmiao Zheng; Steven M Gorelick
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Investigation of small-scale preferential flow with a forced-gradient tracer test.

Authors:  Marco Bianchi; Chunmiao Zheng; Geoffrey R Tick; Steven M Gorelick
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 3.  Lessons learned from 25 years of research at the MADE site.

Authors:  Chunmiao Zheng; Marco Bianchi; Steven M Gorelick
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Characterizing hydraulic conductivity with the direct-push permeameter.

Authors:  James J Butler; Peter Dietrich; Volker Wittig; Tom Christy
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Relative importance of geostatistical and transport models in describing heavily tailed breakthrough curves at the Lauswiesen site.

Authors:  Monica Riva; Alberto Guadagnini; Daniel Fernandez-Garcia; Xavier Sanchez-Vila; Thomas Ptak
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 3.188

6.  Fractional calculus in hydrologic modeling: A numerical perspective.

Authors:  David A Benson; Mark M Meerschaert; Jordan Revielle
Journal:  Adv Water Resour       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.510

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  TEMPERED FRACTIONAL CALCULUS.

Authors:  Mark M Meerschaert; Farzad Sabzikar; Jinghua Chen
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Dispersion of Recovery and Vulnerability to Re-entry in a Model of Human Atrial Tissue With Simulated Diffuse and Focal Patterns of Fibrosis.

Authors:  Richard H Clayton
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.566

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.