Literature DB >> 20807245

Investigation of small-scale preferential flow with a forced-gradient tracer test.

Marco Bianchi1, Chunmiao Zheng, Geoffrey R Tick, Steven M Gorelick.   

Abstract

A new tracer experiment (referred to as MADE-5) was conducted at the well-known Macrodispersion Experiment (MADE) site to investigate the influence of small-scale mass-transfer and dispersion processes on well-to-well transport. The test was performed under dipole forced-gradient flow conditions and concentrations were monitored in an extraction well and in two multilevel sampler (MLS) wells located at 6, 1.5, and 3.75 m from the source, respectively. The shape of the breakthrough curve (BTC) measured at the extraction well is strongly asymmetric showing a rapidly arriving peak and an extensive late-time tail. The BTCs measured at seven different depths in the two MLSs are radically different from one another in terms of shape, arrival times, and magnitude of the concentration peaks. All of these characteristics indicate the presence of a complex network of preferential flow pathways controlling solute transport at the test site. Field-experimental data were also used to evaluate two transport models: a stochastic advection-dispersion model (ADM) based on conditional multivariate Gaussian realizations of the hydraulic conductivity field and a dual-domain single-rate (DDSR) mass-transfer model based on a deterministic reconstruction of the aquifer heterogeneity. Unlike the stochastic ADM realizations, the DDSR accurately predicted the magnitude of the concentration peak and its arrival time (within a 1.5% error). For the multilevel BTCs between the injection and extraction wells, neither model reproduced the observed values, indicating that a high-resolution characterization of the aquifer heterogeneity at the subdecimeter scale would be needed to fully capture 3D transport details.
Copyright © 2010 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2010 National Ground Water Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20807245     DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00746.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ground Water        ISSN: 0017-467X            Impact factor:   2.671


  3 in total

1.  Hydraulic Conductivity Fields: Gaussian or Not?

Authors:  Mark M Meerschaert; Mine Dogan; Remke L Van Dam; David W Hyndman; David A Benson
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 5.240

2.  Micro/Nano-pore Network Analysis of Gas Flow in Shale Matrix.

Authors:  Pengwei Zhang; Liming Hu; Jay N Meegoda; Shengyan Gao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Simulation of solute transport behaviors in saturated karst aquifer system.

Authors:  Xuewei Chu; Hanghang Ding; Xuemei Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.