Nancy R Cook1, Lawrence J Appel, Paul K Whelton. 1. Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (N.R.C.); Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (L.J.A.); and Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA (P.K.W.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have raised the possibility of adverse effects of low sodium, particularly <2300 mg/d, on cardiovascular disease; however, these paradoxical findings might have resulted from suboptimal measurement of sodium and potential biases related to indication or reverse causation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Phases 1 and 2 of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention (TOHP) collected multiple 24-hour urine specimens among prehypertensive individuals. During extended post-trial surveillance, 193 cardiovascular events or cardiovascular disease deaths occurred among 2275 participants not in a sodium reduction intervention with 10 (TOHP II) or 15 (TOHP I) years of post-trial follow-up. Median sodium excretion was 3630 mg/d, with 1.4% of the participants having intake <1500 mg/d and 10% <2300 mg/d, consistent with national levels. Compared with those with sodium excretion of 3600 to <4800 mg/d, risk for those with sodium <2300 mg/d was 32% lower after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.37; P for trend=0.13). There was a linear 17% increase in risk per 1000 mg/d increase in sodium (P=0.05). Spline curves supported a linear association of sodium with cardiovascular events, which continued to decrease from 3600 to 2300 and 1500 mg/d, although the data were sparse at the lowest levels. Controlling for creatinine levels had little effect on these results. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the TOHP studies, which overcome the major methodological challenges of prior studies, are consistent with overall health benefits of reducing sodium intake to the 1500 to 2300 mg/d range in the majority of the population, in agreement with current dietary guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have raised the possibility of adverse effects of low sodium, particularly <2300 mg/d, on cardiovascular disease; however, these paradoxical findings might have resulted from suboptimal measurement of sodium and potential biases related to indication or reverse causation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Phases 1 and 2 of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention (TOHP) collected multiple 24-hour urine specimens among prehypertensive individuals. During extended post-trial surveillance, 193 cardiovascular events or cardiovascular disease deaths occurred among 2275 participants not in a sodium reduction intervention with 10 (TOHP II) or 15 (TOHP I) years of post-trial follow-up. Median sodium excretion was 3630 mg/d, with 1.4% of the participants having intake <1500 mg/d and 10% <2300 mg/d, consistent with national levels. Compared with those with sodium excretion of 3600 to <4800 mg/d, risk for those with sodium <2300 mg/d was 32% lower after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.37; P for trend=0.13). There was a linear 17% increase in risk per 1000 mg/d increase in sodium (P=0.05). Spline curves supported a linear association of sodium with cardiovascular events, which continued to decrease from 3600 to 2300 and 1500 mg/d, although the data were sparse at the lowest levels. Controlling for creatinine levels had little effect on these results. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the TOHP studies, which overcome the major methodological challenges of prior studies, are consistent with overall health benefits of reducing sodium intake to the 1500 to 2300 mg/d range in the majority of the population, in agreement with current dietary guidelines.
Authors: Lawrence J Appel; Edward D Frohlich; John E Hall; Thomas A Pearson; Ralph L Sacco; Douglas R Seals; Frank M Sacks; Sidney C Smith; Dorothea K Vafiadis; Linda V Van Horn Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paul K Whelton; Lawrence J Appel; Ralph L Sacco; Cheryl A M Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Norman Campbell; Sandra B Dunbar; Edward D Frohlich; John E Hall; Mariell Jessup; Darwin R Labarthe; Graham A MacGregor; Frank M Sacks; Jeremiah Stamler; Dorothea K Vafiadis; Linda V Van Horn Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Glenn M Chertow; Pamela G Coxson; Andrew Moran; James M Lightwood; Mark J Pletcher; Lee Goldman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nancy R Cook; Eva Obarzanek; Jeffrey A Cutler; Julie E Buring; Kathryn M Rexrode; Shiriki K Kumanyika; Lawrence J Appel; Paul K Whelton Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-01-12
Authors: Nancy R Cook; Jeffrey A Cutler; Eva Obarzanek; Julie E Buring; Kathryn M Rexrode; Shiriki K Kumanyika; Lawrence J Appel; Paul K Whelton Journal: BMJ Date: 2007-04-20
Authors: Merlin C Thomas; John Moran; Carol Forsblom; Valma Harjutsalo; Lena Thorn; Aila Ahola; Johan Wadén; Nina Tolonen; Markku Saraheimo; Daniel Gordin; Per-Henrik Groop Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Feng J He; Norm R C Campbell; Yuan Ma; Graham A MacGregor; Mary E Cogswell; Nancy R Cook Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Carly E Dougher; Dena E Rifkin; Cheryl Am Anderson; Gerard Smits; Martha S Persky; Geoffrey A Block; Joachim H Ix Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Carla I Mercado; Mary E Cogswell; Amy L Valderrama; Chia-Yih Wang; Catherine M Loria; Alanna J Moshfegh; Donna G Rhodes; Alicia L Carriquiry Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: John H Eisenach; Darrell R Schroeder; Emily S Pavey; Alan R Penheiter; Jean N Knutson; Stephen T Turner; Michael J Joyner Journal: J Physiol Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Puthiery Va; Kevin W Dodd; Lixia Zhao; Angela M Thompson-Paul; Carla I Mercado; Ana L Terry; Sandra L Jackson; Chia-Yih Wang; Catherine M Loria; Alanna J Moshfegh; Donna G Rhodes; Mary E Cogswell Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: William B Farquhar; David G Edwards; Claudine T Jurkovitz; William S Weintraub Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 24.094