Literature DB >> 24415229

Anaerobic bioprocessing of organic wastes.

W Verstraete1, D de Beer, M Pena, G Lettinga, P Lens.   

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion of dissolved, suspended and solid organics has rapidly evolved in the last decades but nevertheless still faces several scientific unknowns. In this review, some fundamentals of bacterial conversions and adhesion are addressed initially. It is argued in the light of ΔG-values of reactions, and in view of the minimum energy quantum per mol, that anaerobic syntrophs must have special survival strategies in order to support their existence: redistributing the available energy between the partners, reduced end-product fermentation reactions and special cell-to-cell physiological interactions. In terms of kinetics, it appears that both reaction rates and residual substrate thresholds are strongly related to minimum ΔG-values. These new fundamental insights open perspectives for efficient design and operation of anaerobic bioprocesses. Subsequently, an overview is given of the current anaerobic biotechnology. For treating wastewaters, a novel and high performance new system has been introduced during the last decade; the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket system (UASB). This reactor concept requires anaerobic consortia to grow in a dense and eco-physiologically well-organized way. The microbial principles of such granular sludge growth are presented. Using a thermodynamic approach, the formation of different types of aggregates is explained. The application of this bioprocess in worldwide wastewater treatment is indicated. Due to the long retention times of the active biomass, the UASB is also suitable for the development of bacterial consortia capable of degrading xenobiotics. Operating granular sludge reactors at high upflow velocities (5-6 m/h) in expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) systems enlarges the application field to very low strength wastewaters (chemical oxygen demand < 1 g/l) and psychrophilic temperatures (10°C). For the treatment of organic suspensions, there is currently a tendency to evolve from the conventional mesophilic continuously stirred tank system to the thermophilic configuration, as the latter permits higher conversion rates and easier sanitation. Integration of ultrafiltration in anaerobic slurry digestion facilitates operation at higher volumetric loading rates and at shorter residence times. With respect to organic solids, the recent trend in society towards source separated collection of biowaste has opened a broad range of new application areas for solid state anaerobic fermentation.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24415229     DOI: 10.1007/BF00360919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  41 in total

1.  Layered structure of bacterial aggregates produced in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed and filter reactor.

Authors:  F A MacLeod; S R Guiot; J W Costerton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A kinetic model for anaerobic digestion of biological sludge.

Authors:  S G Pavlostathis; J M Gossett
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Methanogenesis from volatile fatty acids in downflow stationary fixed-film reactor.

Authors:  A Bhadra; J M Scharer; M Moo-Young
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1987-08-05       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Reductive dechlorination of the nitrogen heterocyclic herbicide picloram.

Authors:  K Ramanand; A Nagarajan; J M Suflita
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.

Authors:  J W Costerton; K J Cheng; G G Geesey; T I Ladd; J C Nickel; M Dasgupta; T J Marrie
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 6.  Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems.

Authors:  G Lettinga
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.271

7.  Mass transfer limitation of sulfate in methanogenic aggregates.

Authors:  A Overmeire; P Lens; W Verstraete
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Metabolic engineering of Pseudomonas putida for the simultaneous biodegradation of benzene, toluene, and p-xylene mixture.

Authors:  J Y Lee; J R Roh; H S Kim
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Granulation of biomass in thermophilic upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors treating acidified wastewaters.

Authors:  W M Wiegant; A W de Man
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Enhanced biodegradation of aromatic pollutants in cocultures of anaerobic and aerobic bacterial consortia.

Authors:  J A Field; A J Stams; M Kato; G Schraa
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.271

View more
  6 in total

1.  Distribution of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria in anaerobic aggregates determined by microsensor and molecular analyses.

Authors:  C M Santegoeds; L R Damgaard; G Hesselink; J Zopfi; P Lens; G Muyzer; D de Beer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Investigation of biosolids degradation under flooded environments for use in underwater cover designs for mine tailing remediation.

Authors:  Yu Jia; Peter Nason; Christian Maurice; Lena Alakangas; Björn Öhlander
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Immobilization patterns and dynamics of acetate-utilizing methanogens immobilized in sterile granular sludge in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors.

Authors:  J E Schmidt; B K Ahring
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Gastro-enteric methane versus sulphate and volatile fatty acid production.

Authors:  L Nollet; W Verstraete
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Anaerobic digestion of secondary residuals from an anaerobic bioreactor at a brewery to enhance bioenergy generation.

Authors:  Benjamin T Bocher; Matthew T Agler; Marcelo L Garcia; Allen R Beers; Largus T Angenent
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 6.  100 years of microbial electricity production: three concepts for the future.

Authors:  Jan B A Arends; Willy Verstraete
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 5.813

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.