Literature DB >> 24414390

Anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement.

Brian R Wolf1, Austin J Ramme2, Carla L Britton1, Annunziato Amendola1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this cadaveric study was to analyze variation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnel placement between surgeons and the influence of preferred surgical technique and surgeon experience level using three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT). In this study, 12 surgeons drilled ACL tunnels on six cadaveric knees each. Surgeons were divided by experience level and preferred surgical technique (two-incision [TI], medial portal [MP], and transtibial [TT]). ACL tunnel aperture locations were analyzed using 3D CT scans and compared with radiographic ACL footprint criteria. The femoral tunnel location from front to back within the notch demonstrated a range of means of 16% with the TI tunnels the furthest back. A range of means of only 5% was found for femoral tunnel low to high positions by technique. The anterior to posterior tibial tunnel measure demonstrated wider variation than the medial to lateral position. The mean tibial tunnel location drilled by TT surgeons was more posterior than surgeons using the other techniques. Overall, 82% of femoral tunnels and 78% of tibial tunnels met all radiographic measurement criteria. Slight (1-7%) differences in mean tunnel placement on the femur and tibia were found between experienced and new surgeons. The location of the femoral tunnel aperture in the front to back plane relative to the notch roof and the anterior to posterior position on the tibia were the most variable measures. Surgeon experience level did not appear to significantly affect tunnel location. This study provides background information that may be beneficial when evaluating multisurgeon and multicenter collaborative ACL studies. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24414390     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1364101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  4 in total

1.  Complications and technical failures are rare in knee ligament reconstruction: analyses based on 31,326 reconstructions during 10 years in Denmark.

Authors:  Daniel Rayan Kalakech Munch; Thomas Irgens Hansen; Kim Lyngby Mikkelsen; Michael Rindom Krogsgaard
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Multirater agreement of the causes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure: a radiographic and video analysis of the MARS cohort.

Authors:  Matthew J Matava; Robert A Arciero; Keith M Baumgarten; James L Carey; Thomas M DeBerardino; Sharon L Hame; Jo A Hannafin; Bruce S Miller; Carl W Nissen; Timothy N Taft; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  To MOON and Back: Lessons Learned and Experience Gained Along the Way.

Authors:  José F Vega; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.182

4.  Transtibial versus independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of femoral aperture positioning.

Authors:  Haitham K Haroun; Maged M Abouelsoud; Mohamed R Allam; Mahmoud M Abdelwahab
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.