Literature DB >> 24413393

The reference frame of visual motion priming depends on underlying motion mechanisms.

Sanae Yoshimoto1, Mariko Uchida-Ota, Tatsuto Takeuchi.   

Abstract

Several different types of motion mechanisms function in the human visual system. The purpose of this study was to clarify the type of reference frame, such as retinotopic and spatiotopic frames of reference, at which those different motion mechanisms function. To achieve this, we used a phenomenon called visual motion priming, in which the perceived direction of a directionally ambiguous test stimulus is influenced by the moving direction of a preceding stimulus. Previous studies have indicated that negative motion priming is induced by a low-level motion mechanism, such as a first-order motion sensor, whereas positive motion priming is induced by a high-level motion mechanism, such as a feature-tracking system. In the experiments, subjects made a saccade after the termination of a smoothly drifting priming stimulus and judged the perceived direction of a 180° phase-shifted sine-wave grating presented subsequently in retinotopic or screen-based spatiotopic coordinates. By manipulating the stimulus parameters, such as primer duration, velocity, and contrast, both positive and negative priming were observed. We found that positive priming was observed in spatiotopic coordinates, whereas negative priming was observed in retinotopic coordinates. Prominent positive priming in spatiotopic coordinates was observed only when the interval between the priming and test stimuli was longer than around 600 ms. This delayed priming effect was not caused by saccadic eye movements. These results suggest that a low-level motion mechanism functions in retinotopic coordinates, whereas a high-level motion mechanism functions in spatiotopic coordinates, in which the representation builds up slowly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feature-tracking mechanism; first-order motion mechanism; motion perception; retinotopic processing; spatiotopic processing; visual motion priming

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24413393     DOI: 10.1167/14.1.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Individual differences in visual motion perception and neurotransmitter concentrations in the human brain.

Authors:  Tatsuto Takeuchi; Sanae Yoshimoto; Yasuhiro Shimada; Takanori Kochiyama; Hirohito M Kondo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Primed and unprimed rebounding illusory apparent motion.

Authors:  Nicolas Davidenko; Nathan H Heller
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Vision: efficient adaptive coding.

Authors:  David Burr; Guido Marco Cicchini
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Perisaccadic Updating of Visual Representations and Attentional States: Linking Behavior and Neurophysiology.

Authors:  Alexandria C Marino; James A Mazer
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-05

5.  Common and independent processing of visual motion perception and oculomotor response.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Tomoyuki Hayasaka
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual priming of two-step motion sequences.

Authors:  Nicolas Davidenko; Nathan H Heller; Maxwell J Schooley; Sean G McDougall
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

7.  Buildup of spatial information over time and across eye-movements.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; M Concetta Morrone; David C Burr
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  The perceived present: What is it, and what is it there for?

Authors:  Peter A White
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.