Literature DB >> 24411986

Chemical and spectroscopic characterization of organic matter during the anaerobic digestion and successive composting of pig slurry.

Maria Rosaria Provenzano1, Anna D Malerba2, Daniela Pezzolla3, Giovanni Gigliotti3.   

Abstract

In this work, anaerobic digestion of pig slurry and successive composting of the digestate after centrifugation were studied by means of chemical analysis, FTIR and fluorescence spectroscopy as excitation-emission matrix (EEM). Chemical analysis highlighted the organic matter transformation occurring during the processes. A decrease of volatile solids and total organic carbon were observed in the digestate with respect to the fresh pig slurry as a consequence of the consumption of sugars, proteins, amino acids and fatty acids used by microorganisms as a C source. Water Extractable Organic Matter (WEOM) was obtained for all samples and fractionated into a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic fraction. The highest WEOM value was found in the pig slurry indicating a high content of labile organic C. The digestate centrifuged and the digestate composted showed lower hydrophilic and higher hydrophobic contents because of the decrease of labile C. Total phenolic content was lower in the digestate with respect to fresh pig slurry sample (36.7%) as a consequence of phenolic compounds degradation. The strong decrease of total reducing sugars in the digestate (76.6%) as compared to pig slurry confirmed that anaerobic process proceed mainly through consumption of sugars which represent a readily available energy source for microbial activity. FTIR spectra of pig slurry showed bands indicative of proteins and carbohydrates. A drop of aliphatic structures and a decrease of polysaccharides was observed after the anaerobic process along with the increase of the peak in the aromatic region. The composted substrate showed an increase of aromatic and a relative decrease of polysaccharides. EEM spectra provided tryptophan:fulvic-like fluorescence ratios which increased from fresh substrate to digestate because of the OM decompostion. Composted substrate presented the lowest ratio due to the humification process.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaerobic digestion; Centrifuged digestate composting; Chemical analysis; EEM fluorescence spectra; FTIR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24411986     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  5 in total

1.  Revealing the correlation of biomethane generation, DOM fluorescence, and microbial community in the mesophilic co-digestion of chicken manure and sheep manure at different mixture ratio.

Authors:  Liuying Song; Dunjie Li; Hongli Fang; Xiangyunong Cao; Rutao Liu; Qigui Niu; Yu-You Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Changes in dissolved organic matter composition and metabolic diversity of bacterial community during the degradation of organic matter in swine effluent.

Authors:  Lei Li; Ming Liu; Yanli Li; Xiaoyan Ma; Xiaoxue Tang; Zhongpei Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Identifying targets for increased biogas production through chemical and organic matter characterization of digestate from full-scale biogas plants: what remains and why?

Authors:  Eva-Maria Ekstrand; Annika Björn; Anna Karlsson; Anna Schnürer; Linda Kanders; Sepehr Shakeri Yekta; Martin Karlsson; Jan Moestedt
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Preliminary design for establishing compost maturity by using the spectral characteristics of five organic fertilizers.

Authors:  Yi-Hong Lin; Yong-Zhang Lin; Yong-Hong Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Anaerobic Codigestion of Sludge: Addition of Butcher's Fat Waste as a Cosubstrate for Increasing Biogas Production.

Authors:  E J Martínez; M V Gil; C Fernandez; J G Rosas; X Gómez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.