| Literature DB >> 24410809 |
Chun-mei Zhang, Yue Zhao, Rong Li, Yang Yu, Li-ying Yan, Li Li, Na-na Liu, Ping Liu, Jie Qiao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous endocrine disorder frequently accompanied by obesity and by insulin resistance, and patients with this syndrome suffer from infertility and poor pregnancy outcome. Disturbances in plasma amino acid (AA) metabolism have been implicated in women with PCOS. However, direct evidence on follicular AA metabolic profiles in PCOS patients and their relationship with pregnancy outcome is sparse.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24410809 PMCID: PMC3897995 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
The clinical characteristics of subjects
| Age (y) | 29.88 ±0.51 | 29.60 ± 0.32 | 0.653 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.84 ±0.49 | 24.40 ± 0.47 | 0.025 |
| LH/FSH | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 1.30 ±0.08 | <.001 |
| FSH (U/L) | 6.48 ±0.23 | 6.02 ±0.22 | 0.154 |
| LH (U/L) | 3.34 ±0.22 | 7.62 ±0.50 | <0.001 |
| A (nmol/L) | 7.45 ± 0.51 | 13.57 ±0.86 | <0.001 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 4.73 ± 0.07 | 4.72 ± 0.07 | 0.949 |
| Fasting insulin (μU/L ) | 7.60 ± 0.49 | 11.37 ± 0.71 | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.54 ± 0.12 | 2.42 ± 0.16 | <0.001 |
Values were expressed as mean ± SEM. Comparisons between groups were done with t test after testing for equality of variance. BMI, body mass index; HOMA-IR: homeostatic model index of insulin resistance.
Relationship between follicular AAs levels and PCOS or BMI
| ILE | 1.89 | -1.50-5.29 | 0.561 | 0.48 | 0.01-0.94 | 0.045 |
| LEU | 2.51 | -4.30-9.33 | 0.467 | 1.17 | 0.24-2.10 | 0.014 |
| VAL | 11.87 | -0.85-24.59 | 0.067 | 3.06 | 1.32-4.80 | <0.001 |
| PHE | 7.40 | 2.46-12.35 | 0.004 | 1.30 | 0.62-1.97 | <0.001 |
| TYR | 6.90 | 2.45-11.35 | 0.003 | 0.38 | -0.22-0.99 | 0.214 |
| TRP | 4.24 | 1.54-6.94 | 0.002 | <0.001 | -0.37-0.37 | 0.999 |
| GLU | 6.06 | -0.96-13.09 | 0.090 | 2.39 | 1.43-3.35 | <0.001 |
| ALA | -25.79 | -55.39-3.81 | 0.087 | 4.32 | 0.27-8.36 | 0.037 |
| ARG | 1.26 | -3.04-5.57 | 0.561 | 0.82 | 0.23-1.41 | 0.007 |
Regression coefficient (β) shown, from multiple linear regression analysis in the samples controlling for BMI and PCOS status; CI, confidence interval.
a, adjusted for BMI.
b, adjusted for PCOS status.
Pregnancy-related indexes grouped by PCOS status or BMI
| No. of oocytes retrieved | 15.40 ± 1.23 | 18.75 ± 1.30 | 0.064 | 18.36 ± 1.19 | 15.26 ± 1.39 | 0.111 |
| No. of fertilized embryos | 10.52 ± 0.98 | 13.71 ± 1.08 | 0.032 | 13.56 ± 0.98 | 9.97 ± 1.12 | 0.025 |
| Fertilization rate | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 0.441 | 0.74 ± 0.02 | 0.61 ± 0.04 | 0.007 |
| No. of 2PN embryos | 9.04 ± 0.89 | 11.40 ± 0.96 | 0.074 | 11.37 ± 0.86 | 8.47 ± 0.99 | 0.040 |
| 2PN rate | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 0.829 | 0.61 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 0.029 |
| No. of available embryos | 6.56 ± 0.77 | 9.49 ± 0.93 | 0.017 | 8.64 ± 0.81 | 7.42 ± 1.03 | 0.364 |
| | | | | | | |
| Yes | 45 | 49 | N/A | 61 | 33 | N/A |
| No | 3 | 14 | N/A | 12 | 5 | N/A |
| Cancellation rate | 6.25% | 22.22% | 0.021 | 16.44% | 13.16% | 0.649 |
| | | | | | | |
| No. of pregnant cases | 25 | 22 | N/A | 30 | 17 | N/A |
| No. of failed cases | 18 | 22 | N/A | 29 | 11 | N/A |
| No. of pregnancy loss | 2 | 5 | N/A | 2 | 5 | N/A |
| Implantation rate | 0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.550 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.40 ± 0.07 | 0.345 |
| Pregnancy rate | 60.00% | 55.10% | 0.210 | 52.46% | 62.07% | 0.184 |
| Abortion rate | 7.40% | 18.52% | 0.224 | 6.25% | 22.72% | 0.107 |
Values were expressed as mean ± SEM. Comparisons between groups were done with t test after testing for equality of variance or Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for proportional data analysis. PN, pronucleus. N/A, not available.
Chi-square test of pregnancy outcome grouped by BCAA values in all embryo-transferred subjects
| Pregnancy rate | 66.67% (36/54) | 45.00% (18/40) | 0.036 |
| Abortion rate | 2.78% (1/36) | 33.33% (6/18) | 0.004 |
Comparisons between groups were made by Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for proportional data analysis.