Infectious diseases, such as influenza, present a prominent global problem including the constant threat of pandemics that initiate in avian or other species and then pass to humans. We report a new sensor that can be specifically functionalized to detect antibodies associated with a wide range of infectious diseases in multiple species. This biosensor is based on electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide generated through the intrinsic catalytic activity of all antibodies: the antibody catalyzed water oxidation pathway (ACWOP). Our platform includes a polymer brush-modified surface where specific antibodies bind to conjugated haptens with high affinity and specificity. Hydrogen peroxide provides an electrochemical signal that is mediated by Resorufin/Amplex Red. We characterize the biosensor platform, using model anti-DNP antibodies, with the ultimate goal of designing a versatile device that is inexpensive, portable, reliable, and fast. We demonstrate detection of antibodies at concentrations that fall well within clinically relevant levels.
Infectious diseases, such as influenza, present a prominent global problem including the constant threat of pandemics that initiate in avian or other species and then pass to humans. We report a new sensor that can be specifically functionalized to detect antibodies associated with a wide range of infectious diseases in multiple species. This biosensor is based on electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide generated through the intrinsic catalytic activity of all antibodies: the antibody catalyzed water oxidation pathway (ACWOP). Our platform includes a polymer brush-modified surface where specific antibodies bind to conjugated haptens with high affinity and specificity. Hydrogen peroxide provides an electrochemical signal that is mediated by Resorufin/Amplex Red. We characterize the biosensor platform, using model anti-DNP antibodies, with the ultimate goal of designing a versatile device that is inexpensive, portable, reliable, and fast. We demonstrate detection of antibodies at concentrations that fall well within clinically relevant levels.
Detection
of antibodies is a
primary tool for diagnosing infectious diseases. Pandemics, which
originate in other species and then jump to humans, represent a particular
threat. Influenza pandemics have occurred every 10–50 years
from as early as 1580 with tragic consequences on human and livestock
populations and their economies.[1] The avian
H5N1 influenza, which probably originated in migratory waterfowl,
infected domestic chickens with high mortality rates.[2] Although transfer to humans initially appeared to be limited
to direct interactions, recent reports show that this virus potentially
can be transmitted by aerosol or respiratory droplets between mammals.[3] With escalating world population and global mobility,
the challenges of preventing flu and other epidemics from proliferating
are increasingly difficult. Significantly improved detection of these
diseases, as they transfer through species, would aid substantially
in providing early warning of these threats.[2] When a viral or other pathogenic infection is met by an immune response,
antibodies are generated that are specific for chemical groups (haptens)
on proteins or other pathogen components (antigens), and hence early
discovery is often most easily accomplished by detection of these
antibodies. Although sensitive antibody detection methods are currently
available, they have limitations, and reliable new technologies are
needed to meet the demand for rapid detection of highly contagious
infections in humans and other species, especially in locations with
limited laboratory access.The importance of antibody detection
extends well beyond disease
diagnosis and includes development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies
as well as experimental biology of many types. Currently, the most
widely used methods for antibody detection are based on the enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Selected haptenic groups are immobilized
on a surface, followed by addition of a sample (e.g., blood serum)
potentially containing antibodies, which bind to the hapten.Detection of these immobilized antibodies is carried out using
a specially prepared secondary reagent, most often a secondary antibody
specific for the analyte antibody class (e.g., IgG). The secondary
antibody is labeled with a tag such as a fluorescent molecule or an
enzyme producing a colorimetric substrate. Requiring a secondary reagent
increases the number of analytical and incubation steps and thus increases
both the analysis time and the risk of nonspecific binding, leading
to false positives.To overcome the limitations of the ELISA
method, we have developed
a sensor platform based on the antibody-catalyzed water oxidation
pathway (ACWOP) that takes advantage of the intrinsic capacity of
single antibodies to catalyze the production of hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2) from water in the presence of singlet
oxygen (1O2*), which can be generated by a photosensitizer
(Figure 1). Wentworth et al. first described
the ACWOP and showed that it is independent of specificity, class,
and species of antibody.[4] The structural
locus of this novel activity was found to be in the constant regions
of immunoglobulins.[5] The catalytic activity
produces multiple mole equivalents of H2O2 per
antibody (reportedly up to 40, or up to 500 if the product is continuously
removed) to reach levels that can be detected and quantified using
fluorescence in a biochemical assay.[6] We
confirmed the previous fluorescence method of ACWOP detection and
have now successfully detected antibody generated H2O2 using electrochemical methods.[6,7] A primary advantage
of the ACWOP is that it allows for the direct detection of antibodies,
via H2O2, regardless of the antibodiesʼ
species and specificity, eliminating the need for specially prepared
secondary reagents and mitigating other limitations of the ELISA approach.
Our ultimate goal is to create a portable microfluidic platform for
sensitive, rapid, and inexpensive detection of antibodies. Herein,
we report key results toward fabricating and testing such a device.
Figure 1
Schematic
of biosensor platform based on the ACWOP process.
Schematic
of biosensor platform based on the ACWOP process.
Results and Discussion
Our device incorporates three key
elements: patterned polymer brushes
to present selected haptenic groups; cofactors required for ACWOP;
and components for electrochemical detection and quantification of
H2O2 (Figure 1). Details
about the materials and methods used and additional control experiments
are given in the Supporting Information. A fundamental feature of our device is the use of poly(oligoethylene
glycol methacrylate) (POEGMA) polymer brushes (Figure 2A) for anchoring a variety of hapten groups and for preventing
nonspecific adsorption of other biomolecules that may be present in
the test sample. OEG moieties are known to be resistant to protein
adsorption and have long-term stability.[8] This is due to the dense packing of neighboring chains which results
in an increased entropic force and drives the brushes into a stretched
state at high grafting densities to yield effective resistance to
nonspecific binding.[9] To produce the necessary
high grafting density, we employed atom transfer radical polymerization
(ATRP) methods to grow brushes on either a silicon wafer chip or a
gold-plated quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) crystal.[10] By functionalizing the initiator end with either
a silane or thiol group, we selectively bind the polymer brushes to
silicon or gold surfaces, respectively. Polymer brushes have the capacity
to be modified with a broad range of haptens for corresponding detection
of antibodies with a broad range of specificities.
Figure 2
(A) Synthesis of polymer brushes on a silicon substrate. Gold surface
modification using thiol based initiators was also carried out. (B)
Cyclic voltammogram of DNP-functionalized polymer brush. Inset: Cyclic
voltammogram of hydroxylamine formed upon reducing DNP. Supporting
electrolyte, 0.1 M H2SO4; sweep rate, 100 mV/s.
(C) Frequency response of QCM crystal platform in PBS, pH 7.2, containing
1 mg/mL BSA solution at 25 °C. Rat anti-DNP IgG antibody solution
(resultant concentration 11 nM) was added at 9000 s.
For initial
development and optimization of this platform, we used
2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP) groups as a model hapten. This well-characterized
hapten binds specific anti-DNP antibodies of several classes and species
and can be conjugated to the ends of the brushes through a one-step
process (Figure 2A). The functionalized polymer
brushes ranged in thickness from 13 to 35 nm, measured via ellipsometry,
and two methods were utilized to confirm the presence of DNP groups.
First, fluorescence imaging with fluorescently labeled anti-DNP IgG
antibodies verified the presence of the DNP groups when compared to
a sample of unfunctionalized brushes (Supporting
Information Figure S1). Second, DNP is electroactive, allowing
measurement of its surface coverage through cyclic voltammetry by
means of the reduction of nitro groups to the corresponding hydroxylamine
(Figure 2B). The surface coverage of DNP was
typically on the order of 10–11 mol/cm2, and as high as 1.5 × 10–10 mol/cm2.(A) Synthesis of polymer brushes on a silicon substrate. Gold surface
modification using thiol based initiators was also carried out. (B)
Cyclic voltammogram of DNP-functionalized polymer brush. Inset: Cyclic
voltammogram of hydroxylamine formed upon reducing DNP. Supporting
electrolyte, 0.1 M H2SO4; sweep rate, 100 mV/s.
(C) Frequency response of QCM crystal platform in PBS, pH 7.2, containing
1 mg/mL BSA solution at 25 °C. Rat anti-DNP IgG antibody solution
(resultant concentration 11 nM) was added at 9000 s.(A, B) Grid patterns of 150 μm wide lines surrounding
300
× 300 μm2 square areas on silicon (A) and gold
electrode of a QCM crystal (B). Note that the figure is not drawn
to scale. (C) Cyclic voltammograms of photosensitizer. Solid lines
are for QCM crystal platform immersed in 0.5 mM [Ru(v-bpy)3](PF6)2, showing electropolymerization of photosensitizer
upon reduction. Dashed lines are for an electropolymerized layer of
[Ru(v-bpy)3]2+ in fresh solution. Supporting
electrolyte, 0.1 M TBAPF6 in MeCN; sweep rate, 100 mV/s.Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM)
measurements were used to determine
the surface coverage of the antibodies (Figure 2C). The functionalized QCM crystal was placed in phosphate-buffered
saline solution (PBS, pH 7.2), and the frequency was allowed to stabilize
before the addition of a solution containing anti-DNP IgG antibodies
(Figure 2C). Acoustic impedance methods (Supporting Information Figure S2) confirmed that
the films were rigid, and the Sauerbrey equation was used to relate
the change in frequency to the mass of immobilized antibodies.[11] The antibody surface coverage was typically
5(±2) × 10–12 mol/cm2. The
POEGMA brushes were tested for nonspecific adsorption in control experiments
by incubating the QCM crystals modified with POEGMA-DNP in a solution
of nonspecific antibodies. No significant change in the frequency
was observed (Supporting Information Figure
S2), confirming that nonspecific antibodies do not bind to the brushes.
Furthermore, no significant increase in the amount of H2O2 was observed under these control conditions (vide infra)
(Supporting Information Figure S3).Two types of platforms were used, one on silicon and another on
a QCM crystal, in both cases presenting the polymer brushes adjacent
to the photosensitizer on the same surface (Figure 3A and B). Our ultimate device is designed to employ silicon
chips. However, for calibration purposes, QCM crystals were used to
quantify the mass of the bound antibodies. For the silicon chips,
gold was evaporated onto 1 × 2 cm2 silicon wafer pieces
in a grid pattern. The photosensitizer was electropolymerized on the
gold (vide infra), whereas the polymer brushes, grown as depicted
in Figure 2A, were confined to the silicon
oxide squares (Figure 3A). The same grid pattern
was used for a QCM crystal (Figure 3B). However,
because both the polymer brushes and photosensitizer were polymerized
from a gold surface on the QCM crystal, a series of steps was employed
to prevent the two films from overlapping. First, a photoresist was
spin coated onto the QCM crystals, exposed and developed to pattern
the grid. Next, the thiol functionalized ATRP initiator was immobilized
on the exposed gold surface, and the photoresist was subsequently
removed. Finally, the photosensitizer was electropolymerized on the
sections where the photoresist was removed, and polymer brushes were
then grown from the regions containing the immobilized ATRP initiator.
This specific order of patterning and immobilization of the different
components allowed for the maximum yield of both photosensitizer and
polymer brushes on the same surface.
Figure 3
(A, B) Grid patterns of 150 μm wide lines surrounding
300
× 300 μm2 square areas on silicon (A) and gold
electrode of a QCM crystal (B). Note that the figure is not drawn
to scale. (C) Cyclic voltammograms of photosensitizer. Solid lines
are for QCM crystal platform immersed in 0.5 mM [Ru(v-bpy)3](PF6)2, showing electropolymerization of photosensitizer
upon reduction. Dashed lines are for an electropolymerized layer of
[Ru(v-bpy)3]2+ in fresh solution. Supporting
electrolyte, 0.1 M TBAPF6 in MeCN; sweep rate, 100 mV/s.
As described above, the
ACWOP process requires singlet oxygen, 1O2*,
which can be generated from ambient oxygen 3O2 through the use of a photosensitizer, such as
[Ru(4-vinyl-4′-methyl-2,2′-bipyridine)3]+2 ([Ru(v-bpy)3]+2). We found that electropolymerized
films of [Ru(v-bpy)3]+2 (Figure 3C)[12] on the gold electrode immediately
adjacent to the brushes maximized production of H2O2. Typical coverage of photosensitizer was 1.5(±0.5) ×
10–9 mol/cm2, corresponding to a thickness
of ca. 26 nm. In addition to enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio,
our results showed a significant increase in the ACWOP H2O2 signal for the adjacent, immobilized photosensitizer
compared to photosensitizer in solution. This increase is likely the
result of having the singlet oxygen generated in close proximity to
the antibody. The lifetime of singlet oxygen in aqueous solution is
in the range 1–10 μs corresponding to a mean square distance
(MSD) diffusion of less than 0.5 μm, assuming a diffusion coefficient
of 2 × 10–5 cm2/s.[13] Generating the singlet oxygen in close proximity to the
antibody clearly enhances the sensitivity of the biosensor. During
the course of developing this biosensor we tested a number of other
photosensitizers, including those used previously in ACWOP experiments,[4] and we found these to be suboptimal. While there
may be more efficient singlet oxygen sensitizers in solution, in our
view [Ru(4-vinyl-4′-methyl-2,2′-bipyridine)3]+2 represents an almost ideal sensitizer in that it can
be readily polymerized, giving rise to the above-mentioned proximity
advantage, and the resulting films are conformal and quite robust.
These are most important and attractive attributes when considering
field deployment. Moreover, the complex is easily synthesized and
purified, and solutions can be used multiple times.To generate 1O2*, and consequently H2O2, the QCM crystal containing the immobilized
antibodies and electropolymerized sensitizer was immersed in 3 mL
of PBS (pH 7.2) and exposed to UV irradiation for 60 min. We found
that 60 min with a broad wavelength source was optimal, as longer
exposure times resulted in a decrease in signal and increase in background,
possibly due to UV damage of the antibody (Supporting
Information Figure S4).The H2O2 generated was quantified using square-wave
voltammetry (SWV) (Figure 4), which provides
high sensitivity at low analyte concentrations.[6,7,14] Amplex Red (N-acetyl-3,7-dihydrophenoxazine)
reacts with H2O2 in a 1:1 ratio in the presence
of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) to produce resorufin (7-hydroxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one), which is fluorescent and also exhibits
a reversible redox response.[15] The lowest
concentration of H2O2 detected with SWV was
0.33 nM (Figure 4A,B).
Figure 4
(A) Square wave voltammetry
of 10 μM Amplex Red and 0.2 U/mL
horseradish peroxidase (HRP) with varying concentrations of H2O2 to construct a (B) calibration curve. Supporting
electrolyte was PBS, pH 6.0. Step size, 5 mV; amplitude, 25 mV; frequency,
25 Hz. (C) Square wave voltammograms showing detection of H2O2 via reduction of resorufin at a 3 mm glassy carbon
working electrode after irradiation of the immunosensorʼs surface
with UV light. Black short dashed line is 10 μM Amplex Red;
red long dashed line is 10 μM Amplex Red with 0.2 U/mL HRP in
the absence of antibody; blue solid line is 10 μM Amplex Red
with 0.2 U/mL HRP in the presence of adsorbed antibody. Step size,
5 mV; amplitude, 25 mV; frequency, 25 Hz. A 1.5 mL aliquot of each
irradiated solution in PBS, pH 7.2, was diluted to 5.0 mL using PBS,
pH 6.0, and then Amplex Red and HRP solutions were added after deaerating
the PBS. Square wave voltammetry was subsequently carried out.
(A) Square wave voltammetry
of 10 μM Amplex Red and 0.2 U/mL
horseradish peroxidase (HRP) with varying concentrations of H2O2 to construct a (B) calibration curve. Supporting
electrolyte was PBS, pH 6.0. Step size, 5 mV; amplitude, 25 mV; frequency,
25 Hz. (C) Square wave voltammograms showing detection of H2O2 via reduction of resorufin at a 3 mm glassy carbon
working electrode after irradiation of the immunosensorʼs surface
with UV light. Black short dashed line is 10 μM Amplex Red;
red long dashed line is 10 μM Amplex Red with 0.2 U/mL HRP in
the absence of antibody; blue solid line is 10 μM Amplex Red
with 0.2 U/mL HRP in the presence of adsorbed antibody. Step size,
5 mV; amplitude, 25 mV; frequency, 25 Hz. A 1.5 mL aliquot of each
irradiated solution in PBS, pH 7.2, was diluted to 5.0 mL using PBS,
pH 6.0, and then Amplex Red and HRP solutions were added after deaerating
the PBS. Square wave voltammetry was subsequently carried out.Assuming a surface coverage of
antibodies of 5 × 10–12 mol/cm2,
and a liquid thickness of 100 μm (a value
readily achievable in a microfluidic platform), a single turnover
per immobilized antibody would give rise to a peroxide concentration
of 500 nM, clearly well above our detection limit (less than 0.5 nM).
In comparative measurements we confirmed that SWV detection is much
more sensitive than the fluorescence assay (Supporting
Information Figure S5).To quantify the number of mole
equivalents of H2O2 generated per antibody,
we evaluated H2O2 produced in the presence and
absence of the immobilized antibody
(Figure 4C). An aliquot of the irradiated solution
was diluted with pH 6.0 PBS, followed by addition of Amplex Red and
HRP. SWV was used to measure the amount of resorufin, which reduces
near −0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl, at a glassy carbon electrode. A
readily quantifiable increase in reduction current (i.e., the amount
of H2O2 produced) resulted from the presence
of adsorbed antibody. Using a calibration curve, the mole ratio of
H2O2 produced per antibody was determined. (Figure 4A,B). The ratio of H2O2 per
antibody was 640–1200, which substantially exceeds the previously
reported values.[6] Although this difference
may be due, in part, to an increase in temperature, the biggest influence
may be the generation of 1O2* in close proximity
to the antibody (vide supra), such that this highly
reactive species is more readily intercepted by the antibody to generate
H2O2. For any particular application, further
calibration with reference antibody stocks will allow the concentration
of antibodies in the test sample to be determined.
Conclusion
In summary, we have developed a general immunobiosensor platform,
employing patterned polymer brushes with photosensitizer films, based
on the electrochemical detection of H2O2 at
clinically relevant concentrations generated through the ACWOP. We
have shown that H2O2 at concentrations as low
as 0.33 nM can be measured in a biosensor device. Antibodies at a
surface coverage of 5 × 10–12 mol/cm2 generate more than 25 × 10–10 mol H2O2/cm2 (or >250 μM H2O2, assuming a volume of 1 cm × 1 cm × 100 μm)
in 60 min. However, H2O2 can be readily quantified
well below this concentration (see Figure 4A), and our tests indicate that this device can detect less than
3 pg antibodies in a 10 μL sample (2 pM). This compares quite
favorably to the most sensitive ELISAs, which require secondary agents
and additional procedural steps. As for the ELISA, a challenge is
to ensure sufficiently high signal-to-noise, which can be limited
by nonspecific antibody binding. The POEGMA brushes in our platform
appear to excel in this regard, and we will continue to develop these
as we test samples including high concentrations of nonspecific antibodies,
resembling typical blood serums. Eliminating the use of secondary
antibodies, as in the case of ELISA, reduces the chances for nonspecific
“false positives” and furthermore makes our platform
appealing for low cost applications. Moreover, since the ACWOP is
a general characteristic of antibodies, our approach can, in principle,
be applied to antibodies of virtually any specificity, class, or species.
We found results obtained from antibodies adsorbed on the platform
on a silicon chip to be similar to those obtained using the QCM crystal
(Supporting Information Figure S6). We
are currently exploring the incorporation of this approach into a
microfluidic platform, which would expedite wash steps to minimize
nonspecific binding, as well as delivery of the final test solution
for SWV measurement of H2O2 concentration in
a separate part of the device. In the long run this device may also
be useful for quantitatively assessing affinities of specific antibodies
in a way not possible with ELISAs because of their need for secondary
antibodies that complicate the binding analysis. Such a microfluidic
platform, in combination with flexible electronics (again recall that
[Ru(4-vinyl-4′-methyl-2,2′-bipyridine)3]+2 can be electropolymerized as conformal films) should eventually
facilitate widespread use and field deployment.
Authors: Colin A Russell; Judith M Fonville; André E X Brown; David F Burke; David L Smith; Sarah L James; Sander Herfst; Sander van Boheemen; Martin Linster; Eefje J Schrauwen; Leah Katzelnick; Ana Mosterín; Thijs Kuiken; Eileen Maher; Gabriele Neumann; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Ron A M Fouchier; Derek J Smith Journal: Science Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sander Herfst; Eefje J A Schrauwen; Martin Linster; Salin Chutinimitkul; Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster; Erin M Sorrell; Theo M Bestebroer; David F Burke; Derek J Smith; Guus F Rimmelzwaan; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Ron A M Fouchier Journal: Science Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: P Wentworth ; L H Jones; A D Wentworth; X Zhu; N A Larsen; I A Wilson; X Xu; W A Goddard ; K D Janda; A Eschenmoser; R A Lerner Journal: Science Date: 2001-09-07 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Katharine M Sturm-Ramirez; Trevor Ellis; Barry Bousfield; Lucy Bissett; Kitman Dyrting; Jerold E Rehg; Leo Poon; Yi Guan; Malik Peiris; Robert G Webster Journal: J Virol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Xueyong Zhu; Paul Wentworth; Anita D Wentworth; Albert Eschenmoser; Richard A Lerner; Ian A Wilson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-02-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel Y Joh; Zackary Zimmers; Manav Avlani; Jacob T Heggestad; Hakan B Aydin; Nancy Ganson; Shourya Kumar; Cassio M Fontes; Rohan K Achar; Michael S Hershfield; Angus M Hucknall; Ashutosh Chilkoti Journal: Adv Healthc Mater Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 9.933