Literature DB >> 24410627

Meta-analysis of the adjunctive use of mitomycin C in primary and revision, external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Kanmin Xue1, Faye E Mellington, Jonathan H Norris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether application of the anti-proliferation agent, mitomycin C (MMC), to the osteotomy site during dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery increases surgical success rates.
METHOD: We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical studies relating to the adjunctive use of MMC in primary and revision, as well as external (EX-DCR) and endonasal DCR (EN-DCR).
RESULTS: 15 studies met our inclusion criteria with a total of 850 DCR procedures. The mean concentration of MMC used was 0.3 mg/ml (range 0.02-0.75 mg/ml) and mean duration of application 18 min (range 2-30 min). MMC significantly reduced the failure rate of primary EX-DCR (risk ratio, RR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.31-0.86) and revision EN-DCR (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.21-0.89). The adjunctive use of MMC in primary EN-DCR, however, did not confer a significant reduction in failure rate compared with control (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.44-2.04). We found a deficiency of evidence regarding the potential benefit of MMC in revision EX-DCR. Only two cases of adverse effects relating to the use of MMC were reported among the studies, both of which related to delayed wound healing.
CONCLUSIONS: Application of MMC to the osteotomy site is a safe and effective way of increasing surgical success rate in primary EX-DCR and revision EN-DCR, but does not provide any significant benefit in primary EN-DCR. Further studies are required to evaluate the potential effect of MMC in revision EX-DCR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dacryocystorhinostomy; endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy; external dacryocystorhinostomy; meta-analysis; mitomycin C

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24410627     DOI: 10.3109/01676830.2013.871297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orbit        ISSN: 0167-6830


  8 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Anatomical and subjective success rates of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy over a seven-year period.

Authors:  N Beshay; R Ghabrial
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Histopathologic effects of a low molecular weight heparin on bone healing in rats: a promising adjuvant in dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Mehmet Numan Alp; Ozdamar Fuad Oken; Mustafa Fevzi Sargon; Ahmet Ucaner
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Efficacy of postoperative mitomycin-C eye drops on the clinical outcome in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Jae Rock Do; Hwa Lee; Sehyun Baek; Tae Soo Lee; Minwook Chang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy as treatment for lower lacrimal pathway obstructions in adults: Review article.

Authors:  Elina Penttilä; Grigori Smirnov; Henri Tuomilehto; Kai Kaarniranta; Juha Seppä
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2015-01

6.  Etiologic analysis of 100 anatomically failed dacryocystorhinostomies.

Authors:  Tarjani Vivek Dave; Faraz Ali Mohammed; Mohammad Javed Ali; Milind N Naik
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-28

7.  Nonendoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: Outcome in 134 eyes.

Authors:  Anasua Ganguly; Chetan Videkar; Ritin Goyal; Suryasnata Rath
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Intra-Operative Mitomycin-C as Adjuvant Therapy in External and Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tamata T S Sousa; Silvana A Schellini; Roberta L F S Meneghim; Antonio J M Cataneo
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2020-04-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.