Literature DB >> 27419832

Anatomical and subjective success rates of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy over a seven-year period.

N Beshay1, R Ghabrial1,2.   

Abstract

PurposeEndonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (END-DCR) is a relatively novel approach that has recently been shown in some studies to provide similar success rates to the more traditional external approach for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). However, a range of success rates using this approach are reported within the literature and the majority of oculoplastic surgeons are still favouring the external approach. The purpose of this study was to review the anatomical and subjective success rates of END-DCRs performed over a 7-year period.Patients and methodsWe provide a review of the success rates of 288 END-DCRs for the treatment of acquired NLDO performed over a 7-year period by a single oculoplastic surgeon in Sydney, Australia. We describe the operative technique used and define anatomical success as demonstrated patency of the nasolacrimal drainage system at 10 weeks postoperatively while subjective success is defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of symptoms as reported by patients at the same time point.ResultsIn our study, we were able to demonstrate that out of 288 END-DCRs, an average anatomical success rate of 89.6% and an average subjective success rate of 81.3% were achievable.ConclusionsWe conclude that the success rates using our endonasal approach remain similar to those obtained using the external approach, as reported within the literature, and may be considered as a primary treatment option for acquired NLDO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27419832      PMCID: PMC5108011          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2016.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  23 in total

1.  Surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: analysis of 1083 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Su-Kyung Jung; Yong-Chan Kim; Won-Kyung Cho; Ji-Sun Paik; Suk-Woo Yang
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis on outcomes for endoscopic versus external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  June Huang; Joanne Malek; David Chin; Kornkiat Snidvongs; Geoff Wilcsek; Krishna Tumuluri; Ray Sacks; Richard J Harvey
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2013-12-19

3.  Analysis of functional and anatomic success following endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Barbara Zuercher; Jean-Jacques Tritten; Jean Paul Friedrich; Philippe Monnier
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 4.  Long-term outcomes in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Anna Knisely; Richard Harvey; Raymond Sacks
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Endoscopic vs external dacryocystorhinostomy-comparison from the patients' aspect.

Authors:  Serdar Ozer; Pinar A Ozer
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  The return of the jedi: comparison of the outcomes of endolaser dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Mehmet Özgür Zengin; Erdem Eren
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.858

7.  The Learning Curve in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: Outcomes in Surgery Performed by Trainee Oculoplastic Surgeons.

Authors:  Raman Malhotra; Jonathan H Norris; Suresh Sagili; Zaid Al-Abbadi; Inbal Avisar
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2015-11-03

8.  Results of combined multispecialty endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Charles Kim; Ashutosh Kacker; Aaron N Pearlman; Gary J Lelli
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2013-05-10

9.  Ostium shrinkage after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  WengOnn Chan; Dinesh Selva
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Patient satisfaction following endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a quality of life study.

Authors:  G Jutley; R Karim; N Joharatnam; S Latif; T Lynch; J M Olver
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.