Literature DB >> 24410240

Polymer capture by α-hemolysin pore upon salt concentration gradient.

Byoung-jin Jeon1, Murugappan Muthukumar1.   

Abstract

We have measured the rate of capture of single molecules of sodium poly(styrene sulfonate) by α-hemolysin protein pore by varying applied voltage, pH, and the salt concentration asymmetry across the pore. We show that electrostatic interaction between the polyelectrolyte and the protein pore significantly affects the polymer capture rate in addition to the enhancement of drift arising from electrolyte concentration gradient. At higher pH values where the electrostatic interaction between the polymer and the α-hemolysin pore is repulsive, an antagonistic coupling with the drift induced by salt concentration gradient emerges. This antagonistic coupling results in a nonmonotonic dependence of the polymer capture rate on the salt concentration in the donor compartment. The coupling between the pore-polymer interaction and drift can be weakened by increasing the strength of the electric field that drives the polymer translocation. In contrast, at lower pH values where the polymer-pore interaction is attractive, a synergy with the additional drift from salt concentration asymmetry arises and the capture rate depends monotonically on the donor salt concentration. For higher pH, we identify two regimes for the enhancement of capture rate by salt concentration gradient: (a) drift-dominated regime, where the capture rate is roughly quadratic in the ratio of salt concentration in the receiver compartment to that in the donor compartment, and (b) antagonistic coupling regime at higher values of this ratio with a linear relation for the polymer capture rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24410240      PMCID: PMC3895088          DOI: 10.1063/1.4855075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  34 in total

1.  Voltage-driven DNA translocations through a nanopore.

Authors:  A Meller; L Nivon; D Branton
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-04-09       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Detecting protein analytes that modulate transmembrane movement of a polymer chain within a single protein pore.

Authors:  L Movileanu; S Howorka; O Braha; H Bayley
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Rapid nanopore discrimination between single polynucleotide molecules.

Authors:  A Meller; L Nivon; E Brandin; J Golovchenko; D Branton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fabrication of solid-state nanopores with single-nanometre precision.

Authors:  A J Storm; J H Chen; X S Ling; H W Zandbergen; C Dekker
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 43.841

5.  Sizing of an ion pore by access resistance measurements.

Authors:  I Vodyanoy; S M Bezrukov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Simulations of stochastic sensing of proteins.

Authors:  Chung Yin Kong; M Muthukumar
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel.

Authors:  J J Kasianowicz; E Brandin; D Branton; D W Deamer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Structure of staphylococcal alpha-hemolysin, a heptameric transmembrane pore.

Authors:  L Song; M R Hobaugh; C Shustak; S Cheley; H Bayley; J E Gouaux
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Subunit stoichiometry of staphylococcal alpha-hemolysin in crystals and on membranes: a heptameric transmembrane pore.

Authors:  J E Gouaux; O Braha; M R Hobaugh; L Song; S Cheley; C Shustak; H Bayley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Access resistance of a small circular pore.

Authors:  J E Hall
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  10 in total

1.  Electrostatic Control of Polymer Translocation Speed through α‑Hemolysin Protein Pore.

Authors:  Byoung-Jin Jeon; Murugappan Muthukumar
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.985

2.  Electrophoretic mobilities of counterions and a polymer in cylindrical pores.

Authors:  Sunil P Singh; M Muthukumar
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Stochastic resonance during a polymer translocation process.

Authors:  Debasish Mondal; M Muthukumar
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Ratchet rectification effect on the translocation of a flexible polyelectrolyte chain.

Authors:  Debasish Mondal; M Muthukumar
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Membrane protein-based biosensors.

Authors:  Nobuo Misawa; Toshihisa Osaki; Shoji Takeuchi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  How capture affects polymer translocation in a solitary nanopore.

Authors:  Swarnadeep Seth; Aniket Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.304

7.  Role of non-equilibrium conformations on driven polymer translocation.

Authors:  H H Katkar; M Muthukumar
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Single molecule electrophoresis of star polymers through nanopores: Simulations.

Authors:  H H Katkar; M Muthukumar
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 9.  Channel-forming bacterial toxins in biosensing and macromolecule delivery.

Authors:  Philip A Gurnev; Ekaterina M Nestorovich
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.546

10.  Investigating asymmetric salt profiles for nanopore DNA sequencing with biological porin MspA.

Authors:  Ian C Nova; Ian M Derrington; Jonathan M Craig; Matthew T Noakes; Benjamin I Tickman; Kenji Doering; Hugh Higinbotham; Andrew H Laszlo; Jens H Gundlach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.