OBJECT: Coinfused surrogate imaging tracers can provide direct insight into the properties of convection-enhanced delivery (CED) in the nervous system. To better understand the distributive properties of CED in a clinical circumstance, the authors analyzed the imaging findings in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) patients undergoing coinfusion of Gd-DTPA and interleukin-13-Pseudomonas exotoxin (IL13-PE). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing CED (maximal rates of 5 or 10 μl/minute) of Gd-DTPA (1 or 5 mM) and IL13-PE (0.125 μg/ml or 0.25 μg/ml) for DIPG were included. Real-time MRI was performed during infusions, and imaging results were analyzed. RESULTS: Four patients (2 males, 2 females; mean age at initial infusion 13.0 ± 5.3 years; range 5-17 years) underwent 5 infusions into DIPGs. Brainstem infusions were clearly identified on T1-weighted MR images at 1-mM (1 infusion) and 5-mM (4 infusions) coinfused Gd-DTPA concentrations. While the volume of distribution (Vd) increased progressively with volume of infusion (Vi) (mean volume 2.5 ± 0.9 ml; range 1.1-3.7 ml), final Vd:Vi ratios were significantly reduced with lower Gd-DTPA concentration (Vd:Vi for 1 mM of 1.6 compared with a mean Vd:Vi ratio for 5 mM of 3.3 ± 1.0) (p = 0.04). Similarly, anatomical distribution patterns were affected by preferential flow along parallel axial fiber tracts, into prior infusion cannula tracts and intraparenchymal air pockets, and leak back around the infusion cannula at the highest rate of infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging of a coinfused Gd-DTPA surrogate tracer provided direct insight into the properties of CED in a clinical application. While clinically relevant Vds can be achieved by convective delivery, specific tissue properties can affect distribution volume and pattern, including Gd-DTPA concentration, preferential flow patterns, and infusion rate. Understanding of these properties of CED can enhance its clinical application. Part of clinical trial no. NCT00880061 ( ClinicalTrials.gov ).
OBJECT: Coinfused surrogate imaging tracers can provide direct insight into the properties of convection-enhanced delivery (CED) in the nervous system. To better understand the distributive properties of CED in a clinical circumstance, the authors analyzed the imaging findings in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) patients undergoing coinfusion of Gd-DTPA and interleukin-13-Pseudomonas exotoxin (IL13-PE). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing CED (maximal rates of 5 or 10 μl/minute) of Gd-DTPA (1 or 5 mM) and IL13-PE (0.125 μg/ml or 0.25 μg/ml) for DIPG were included. Real-time MRI was performed during infusions, and imaging results were analyzed. RESULTS: Four patients (2 males, 2 females; mean age at initial infusion 13.0 ± 5.3 years; range 5-17 years) underwent 5 infusions into DIPGs. Brainstem infusions were clearly identified on T1-weighted MR images at 1-mM (1 infusion) and 5-mM (4 infusions) coinfused Gd-DTPA concentrations. While the volume of distribution (Vd) increased progressively with volume of infusion (Vi) (mean volume 2.5 ± 0.9 ml; range 1.1-3.7 ml), final Vd:Vi ratios were significantly reduced with lower Gd-DTPA concentration (Vd:Vi for 1 mM of 1.6 compared with a mean Vd:Vi ratio for 5 mM of 3.3 ± 1.0) (p = 0.04). Similarly, anatomical distribution patterns were affected by preferential flow along parallel axial fiber tracts, into prior infusion cannula tracts and intraparenchymal air pockets, and leak back around the infusion cannula at the highest rate of infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging of a coinfused Gd-DTPA surrogate tracer provided direct insight into the properties of CED in a clinical application. While clinically relevant Vds can be achieved by convective delivery, specific tissue properties can affect distribution volume and pattern, including Gd-DTPA concentration, preferential flow patterns, and infusion rate. Understanding of these properties of CED can enhance its clinical application. Part of clinical trial no. NCT00880061 ( ClinicalTrials.gov ).
Authors: Russell R Lonser; Stuart Walbridge; Kayhan Garmestani; John A Butman; Hugh A Walters; Alexander O Vortmeyer; Paul F Morrison; Martin W Brechbiel; Edward H Oldfield Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: R H Bobo; D W Laske; A Akbasak; P F Morrison; R L Dedrick; E H Oldfield Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1994-03-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J N Bruce; A Falavigna; J P Johnson; J S Hall; B D Birch; J T Yoon; E X Wu; R L Fine; A T Parsa Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Malisa Sarntinoranont; Michael J Iadarola; Russell R Lonser; Paul F Morrison Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Vadim Tsvankin; Rintaro Hashizume; Hiroaki Katagi; James E Herndon; Christopher Lascola; Talaignair N Venkatraman; Daniel Picard; Brainard Burrus; Oren J Becher; Eric M Thompson Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: John D Heiss; Davis P Argersinger; William H Theodore; John A Butman; Susumu Sato; Omar I Khan Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Xiaoli Liu; Achuthamangalam B Madhankumar; Patti A Miller; Kari A Duck; Susan Hafenstein; Elias Rizk; Becky Slagle-Webb; Jonas M Sheehan; James R Connor; Qing X Yang Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-10-31 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: John D Heiss; Codrin Lungu; Dima A Hammoud; Peter Herscovitch; Debra J Ehrlich; Davis P Argersinger; Sanhita Sinharay; Gretchen Scott; Tianxia Wu; Howard J Federoff; Kareem A Zaghloul; Mark Hallett; Russell R Lonser; Krystof S Bankiewicz Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: John D Heiss; Aria Jamshidi; Smit Shah; Staci Martin; Pamela L Wolters; Davis P Argersinger; Katherine E Warren; Russell R Lonser Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Stephen Harward; S Harrison Farber; Michael Malinzak; Oren Becher; Eric M Thompson Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2017-11-18 Impact factor: 1.475