Zélia M Corrêa1, James J Augsburger. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between rate of flattening of posterior uveal melanomas (PUMs) over the first 6 months following I-125 plaque radiotherapy and gene expression profile (GEP) class of tumor cells obtained by fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) prior to treatment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of relationship between GEP of PUM cells obtained by FNAB at or prior to treatment and rate of tumor flattening following I-125 plaque radiotherapy. Impact of initial tumor thickness was minimized by pairing cases so baseline tumor thickness in subgroups was matched to within ± 0.5 mm. Paired t-testing compared mean tumor thickness in GEP subgroups at 3- and 6-months post treatment assessments. RESULTS: Our initial group consisted of 269 patients. Seventy-seven tumors (28.6%) were GEP class 2. Twenty-seven of these were treated by I-125 plaque radiotherapy post-FNAB and returned for post treatment evaluations at 3 and 6 months. A matched GEP class 1 tumor was identified for 25 class 2 cases. Matched tumor pairs ranged in thickness from 2.5 to 11.5 mm at baseline. Mean tumor thickness at baseline in the GEP 1 subgroup was 5.8 and 5.9 mm in the GEP 2 subgroup. Three-months post plaque, mean tumor thickness was 4.5 mm in class 1 cases and 4.6 mm in class 2 cases (paired t = 0.31, P = 0.76). The 6-month post-plaque, mean tumor thickness was 4.0 mm in each subgroup (paired t = 0.25, P = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a lack of association between the GEP class and the rate of flattening of posterior uveal melanomas following I-125 plaque radiotherapy of PUMs.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between rate of flattening of posterior uveal melanomas (PUMs) over the first 6 months following I-125 plaque radiotherapy and gene expression profile (GEP) class of tumor cells obtained by fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) prior to treatment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of relationship between GEP of PUM cells obtained by FNAB at or prior to treatment and rate of tumor flattening following I-125 plaque radiotherapy. Impact of initial tumor thickness was minimized by pairing cases so baseline tumor thickness in subgroups was matched to within ± 0.5 mm. Paired t-testing compared mean tumor thickness in GEP subgroups at 3- and 6-months post treatment assessments. RESULTS: Our initial group consisted of 269 patients. Seventy-seven tumors (28.6%) were GEP class 2. Twenty-seven of these were treated by I-125 plaque radiotherapy post-FNAB and returned for post treatment evaluations at 3 and 6 months. A matched GEP class 1 tumor was identified for 25 class 2 cases. Matched tumor pairs ranged in thickness from 2.5 to 11.5 mm at baseline. Mean tumor thickness at baseline in the GEP 1 subgroup was 5.8 and 5.9 mm in the GEP 2 subgroup. Three-months post plaque, mean tumor thickness was 4.5 mm in class 1 cases and 4.6 mm in class 2 cases (paired t = 0.31, P = 0.76). The 6-month post-plaque, mean tumor thickness was 4.0 mm in each subgroup (paired t = 0.25, P = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a lack of association between the GEP class and the rate of flattening of posterior uveal melanomas following I-125 plaque radiotherapy of PUMs.
Authors: Kishan Gupta; Colin A McCannel; Mitchell Kamrava; James Lamb; Robert D Almanzor; Tara A McCannel Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Duncan E Berry; Amy C Schefler; Michael I Seider; Miguel Materin; Sandra Stinnett; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya Journal: Retina Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Christina Binder; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Amy C Schefler; Michael I Seider; Richard Crilly; Arthur Hung; Sheridan Meltsner; Yvonne Mowery; David G Kirsch; Bin S Teh; Richard L S Jennelle; Matthew T Studenski; Wu Liu; Choonik Lee; James A Hayman; Brian Kastner; Michael Hadsell; Alison H Skalet Journal: Ocul Oncol Pathol Date: 2019-12-11
Authors: Duncan E Berry; Amy C Schefler; Michael I Seider; Miguel Materin; Sandra Stinnett; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya Journal: Retina Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.975