Literature DB >> 24408901

Bumps and bridges on the road to responsible sharing of clinical trial data.

Jesse A Berlin1, Sandra Morris, Frank Rockhold, Lisa Askie, Davina Ghersi, Joanne Waldstreicher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sharing data from clinical trials could assist with the advancement of science and medicine, potentially providing a better understanding of both the benefits and risks of medicines and other treatments. Sharing data also allows for questions to be addressed at the meta-analysis level that cannot be addressed within individual studies.
PURPOSE: In this article, we offer some practical recommendations that will allow researchers to readily combine datasets from different studies and sources, thereby enabling meta-analyses that could have significant impact on advancing medicine.
METHODS: The authors relied on their collective experience in the conduct and reporting of clinical trials to define the areas of potential concern related to responsible sharing of clinical trial data. We conducted a review of the literature and engaged in an iterative consensus-building process.
RESULTS: To further the goal of responsible sharing of clinical trial data, collaboration on a consistent set of data standards and methods across both industry and academia is sorely needed. Protection of participant privacy is a paramount principle. The additional questions of who maintains, funds, and oversees databases of participant-level data will be important to resolve. Requiring researchers to register their requests for participant-level data and to provide details of their intended research would allow others to evaluate the proposed research plan, consistent with the principles of science and transparency. LIMITATIONS: The recommendations represent the views of the individual authors. We recognize that other approaches to data sharing that have been advocated are also based on sound ethical and scientific principles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24408901     DOI: 10.1177/1740774513514497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  11 in total

1.  Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Van Lieou; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Characteristics of available studies and dissemination of research using major clinical data sharing platforms.

Authors:  Enrique Vazquez; Henri Gouraud; Florian Naudet; Cary P Gross; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross; Joshua D Wallach
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  To share or not to share? Expected pros and cons of data sharing in radiological research.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Marco Alì; Myriam G Hunink; Nehmat Houssami; Luca M Sconfienza; Giovanni Di Leo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Recommendations for the role of publishers in access to data.

Authors:  Jennifer Lin; Carly Strasser
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff.

Authors:  Lisa M Federer; Ya-Ling Lu; Douglas J Joubert; Judith Welsh; Barbara Brandys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluation of Data Sharing After Implementation of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Data Sharing Statement Requirement.

Authors:  Valentin Danchev; Yan Min; John Borghi; Mike Baiocchi; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  How should individual participant data (IPD) from publicly funded clinical trials be shared?

Authors:  C Tudur Smith; C Hopkins; M R Sydes; K Woolfall; M Clarke; G Murray; P Williamson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Make Data Sharing Routine to Prepare for Public Health Emergencies.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Chretien; Caitlin M Rivers; Michael A Johansson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 9.  Obtaining and managing data sets for individual participant data meta-analysis: scoping review and practical guide.

Authors:  Matthew Ventresca; Holger J Schünemann; Fergus Macbeth; Mike Clarke; Lehana Thabane; Gareth Griffiths; Simon Noble; David Garcia; Maura Marcucci; Alfonso Iorio; Qi Zhou; Mark Crowther; Elie A Akl; Gary H Lyman; Viktoria Gloy; Marcello DiNisio; Matthias Briel
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Overview and experience of the YODA Project with clinical trial data sharing after 5 years.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Joanne Waldstreicher; Stephen Bamford; Jesse A Berlin; Karla Childers; Nihar R Desai; Ginger Gamble; Cary P Gross; Richard Kuntz; Richard Lehman; Peter Lins; Sandra A Morris; Jessica D Ritchie; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 6.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.