Literature DB >> 24407899

Long-term totally implantable venous access port systems--one center experience.

Jerzy Paleczny1, Beata Banyś-Jafernik, Katarzyna Gazurek, Krzysztof Kierpieć, Halina Szczerba, Piotr Zipser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implantable venous access ports are essential for patients requiring chronic venous access. The aim of this study was to determine securities, risks of complications and patients' satisfaction with using a port system.
METHODS: Between April 2008 and May 2013, 220 consecutive patients (mean age: 53 ± 12 years; 155 female) were enrolled into this observational, single-centre study. 65 patients who received a port system were asked to complete a questionnaire with the aim of evaluating the patient's satisfaction and quality of life.
RESULTS: First vena subclavia and later internal jugular were the most frequently used for venous access. Among serious complications, three cases (1.5%) of pneumothorax were observed. Technical difficulties of cannulation were observed in 12 cases (5.6%). In the late period, functional complications, defined as 'easy injection, impossible aspiration' at port access, affected more than 25% of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of vascular ports is a safe procedure, and serious complications are rare. In the evaluated group, complications connected with the complete functioning of ports were observed. Among responders, more than 90% of patients reported high overall satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24407899     DOI: 10.5603/AIT.2013.0042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther        ISSN: 1642-5758


  7 in total

1.  Surgeon, not technique, defines outcomes after central venous port insertion.

Authors:  Audrey E Ertel; Zachary D McHenry; Vijay K Venkatesan; Dennis J Hanseman; Koffi Wima; Richard S Hoehn; Shimul A Shah; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Totally implantable venous access port systems and associated complications: A single-institution retrospective analysis of 2,996 breast cancer patients.

Authors:  L I Ma; Yueping Liu; Jianxin Wang; Yuan Chang; Long Yu; Cuizhi Geng
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-07

3.  Brachial Approach As an Alternative Technique of Fibrin Sheath Removal for Implanted Venous Access Devices.

Authors:  Charalampos Sotiriadis; Steven David Hajdu; Francesco Doenz; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-04-10

4.  Cephalic vein approach for the implantable central venous access: A retrospective review of the single institution's experiences; Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jiyoung Rhu; Kang Woong Jun; Byung Joo Song; Kiyoung Sung; Jinbeom Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Internal jugular vein versus subclavian vein as the percutaneous insertion site for totally implantable venous access devices: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Shaoyong Wu; Jingxiu Huang; Zongming Jiang; Zhimei Huang; Handong Ouyang; Li Deng; Wenqian Lin; Jin Guo; Weian Zeng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Intelligent Internet of Things Medical Technology in Implantable Intravenous Infusion Port in Children with Malignant Tumors.

Authors:  Shaohong Liu; Luxing Jiang; Xin Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 2.682

7.  1000 Port-A-Cath ® placements by subclavian vein approach: single surgeon experience.

Authors:  S Mudan; A Giakoustidis; D Morrison; S Iosifidou; R Raobaikady; K Neofytou; J Stebbing
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.