Leen Aerts1, Paul Enzlin, Johan Verhaeghe, Ignace Vergote, Frédéric Amant. 1. *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven; †Centre for Couple, Family, and Sex Therapy, University Psychiatric Centre, and ‡Department of Development and Regeneration, Institute for Family and Sexuality Studies, Catholic University in Leuven, Belgium; and §Research Fund Flanders, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Vulvectomy for vulvar malignancy can affect sexual functioning based on anatomic, physiologic, psychologic, and relational mechanisms. The aims of this study were to prospectively investigate sexual adjustment of women with vulvar malignancy during a follow-up period of 1 year after vulvectomy and to compare the results with healthy control women. METHODS: In this prospective controlled study, participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory scale, World Health Organization-5 Well-being scale, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Short Sexual Functioning Scale, and Specific Sexual Problems Questionnaire to assess various aspects of psychosocial and sexual functioning just before surgery, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-nine women with vulvar malignancy and 29 healthy controls completed the survey. Compared with the presurgery status, no significant differences were found in psychologic, relational, and sexual functioning in women after surgery for vulvar malignancy. Compared with healthy control women, women with vulvar malignancy reported significantly lower psychologic well-being and quality of partner relationship, both before and after treatment. Moreover, significantly more patients with vulvar malignancy reported preoperative and postoperatively sexual dysfunctions than healthy controls, including entry and deep dyspareunia, abdominal pain during intercourse, reduced ability to achieve orgasm, and reduced intensity of orgasm. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study yielded no differences in psychosocial and sexual functioning for women with vulvar malignancy before and after vulvectomy. However, when compared with healthy controls, patients with vulvar malignancy are at high risk for sexual dysfunctions, both before and after surgical treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Vulvectomy for vulvar malignancy can affect sexual functioning based on anatomic, physiologic, psychologic, and relational mechanisms. The aims of this study were to prospectively investigate sexual adjustment of women with vulvar malignancy during a follow-up period of 1 year after vulvectomy and to compare the results with healthy control women. METHODS: In this prospective controlled study, participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory scale, World Health Organization-5 Well-being scale, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Short Sexual Functioning Scale, and Specific Sexual Problems Questionnaire to assess various aspects of psychosocial and sexual functioning just before surgery, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-nine women with vulvar malignancy and 29 healthy controls completed the survey. Compared with the presurgery status, no significant differences were found in psychologic, relational, and sexual functioning in women after surgery for vulvar malignancy. Compared with healthy control women, women with vulvar malignancy reported significantly lower psychologic well-being and quality of partner relationship, both before and after treatment. Moreover, significantly more patients with vulvar malignancy reported preoperative and postoperatively sexual dysfunctions than healthy controls, including entry and deep dyspareunia, abdominal pain during intercourse, reduced ability to achieve orgasm, and reduced intensity of orgasm. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study yielded no differences in psychosocial and sexual functioning for women with vulvar malignancy before and after vulvectomy. However, when compared with healthy controls, patients with vulvar malignancy are at high risk for sexual dysfunctions, both before and after surgical treatment.
Authors: Laura B Huffman; Ellen M Hartenbach; Jeanne Carter; Joanne K Rash; David M Kushner Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-11-07 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Jan Filip Baekelandt; Peter A De Mulder; Ilse Le Roy; Chantal Mathieu; Annouschka Laenen; Paul Enzlin; Steven Weyers; Ben W J Mol; Jan J A Bosteels Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Elisabet Mattsson; Lisa Ljungman; Kim Einhorn; Inger Sundström Poromaa; Karin Stålberg; Anna Wikman Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Thais Sousa Rodrigues Guedes; Marcello Barbosa Otoni Gonçalves Guedes; Rebeca de Castro Santana; José Felipe Costa da Silva; Amanda Almeida Gomes Dantas; Mirari Ochandorena-Acha; Marc Terradas-Monllor; Javier Jerez-Roig; Dyego Leandro Bezerra de Souza Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-21 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jan Baekelandt; Peter A De Mulder; Ilse Le Roy; Chantal Mathieu; Annouschka Laenen; Paul Enzlin; Steven Weyers; Ben Wj Mol; Jan Ja Bosteels Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Georgina L Jones; Richard M Jacques; Joanne Thompson; Hilary J Wood; Jane Hughes; William Ledger; Mo'iad Alazzam; Stephen C Radley; John A Tidy Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 3.894