Elisabet Mattsson1, Lisa Ljungman2, Kim Einhorn2, Inger Sundström Poromaa2, Karin Stålberg2, Anna Wikman3. 1. Department of Health Care Sciences, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 3. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. anna.wikman@kbh.uu.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Less attention has been given to younger adults' psycho-oncology care needs than to children and older adults with cancer. The aim was to explore how care following end-of-treatment was perceived by women treated for different gynecologic cancer diagnoses during younger adulthood. METHODS: A sample of 207 women diagnosed with gynecologic cancer 2008 to 2016, aged 19-39 at time of diagnosis answered one open-ended question regarding important aspects of care after end-of-treatment. The written responses were analyzed with manifest content analysis and presented in relation to the women's diagnoses, i.e., cervical (n = 130), ovarian (n = 57), and other gynecologic cancer diagnoses (n = 20). RESULTS: The analysis resulted in three categories: Unmet long-term supportive care needs, Satisfying long-term supportive care, and Health care organizational difficulties. Over half of the women (66.7%) described unmet care needs. The corresponding figures were 80.7, 63.1 and 50% for women diagnosed with ovarian, cervical and other gynecologic cancer diagnoses, respectively. Satisfying supportive care were described by approximately one quarter of the women (26.1%). Among women diagnosed with ovarian cancer 14% described satisfying supportive care. The corresponding figures were 26.9 and 30% for women diagnosed with cervical cancer and other gynecological diagnoses, respectively. Approximately one quarter of the women, irrespectively of diagnosis, described aspects related to health care organizational difficulties (28%). CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the importance of good quality care linked to the diagnosis and based on an understanding of the woman's need, desire and expectation of support after end-of-treatment.
BACKGROUND: Less attention has been given to younger adults' psycho-oncology care needs than to children and older adults with cancer. The aim was to explore how care following end-of-treatment was perceived by women treated for different gynecologic cancer diagnoses during younger adulthood. METHODS: A sample of 207 women diagnosed with gynecologic cancer 2008 to 2016, aged 19-39 at time of diagnosis answered one open-ended question regarding important aspects of care after end-of-treatment. The written responses were analyzed with manifest content analysis and presented in relation to the women's diagnoses, i.e., cervical (n = 130), ovarian (n = 57), and other gynecologic cancer diagnoses (n = 20). RESULTS: The analysis resulted in three categories: Unmet long-term supportive care needs, Satisfying long-term supportive care, and Health care organizational difficulties. Over half of the women (66.7%) described unmet care needs. The corresponding figures were 80.7, 63.1 and 50% for women diagnosed with ovarian, cervical and other gynecologic cancer diagnoses, respectively. Satisfying supportive care were described by approximately one quarter of the women (26.1%). Among women diagnosed with ovarian cancer 14% described satisfying supportive care. The corresponding figures were 26.9 and 30% for women diagnosed with cervical cancer and other gynecological diagnoses, respectively. Approximately one quarter of the women, irrespectively of diagnosis, described aspects related to health care organizational difficulties (28%). CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the importance of good quality care linked to the diagnosis and based on an understanding of the woman's need, desire and expectation of support after end-of-treatment.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Gynecologic; Oncology; Quality of life; Survivorship; Young adult
Authors: Kristy K Ward; Nina R Shah; Cheryl C Saenz; Michael T McHale; Edwin A Alvarez; Steven C Plaxe Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-06-02 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Cathleen M Rivera; Brandon R Grossardt; Deborah J Rhodes; Robert D Brown; Véronique L Roger; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca Journal: Menopause Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Elisabet Mattsson; Kim Einhorn; Lisa Ljungman; Inger Sundström-Poromaa; Karin Stålberg; Anna Wikman Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Echo L Warner; Erin E Kent; Kelly M Trevino; Helen M Parsons; Bradley J Zebrack; Anne C Kirchhoff Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 6.860