| Literature DB >> 24406779 |
Edouard Koch1, David Rosenbaum, Aurélie Brolly, José-Alain Sahel, Philippe Chaumet-Riffaud, Xavier Girerd, Florence Rossant, Michel Paques.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR) of retinal arteries is a recognized surrogate of end-organ damage due to aging and/or arterial hypertension. However, parietal morphometry remains difficult to assess in vivo. Recently, it was shown that adaptive optics retinal imaging can resolve parietal structures of retinal arterioles in humans in vivo. Here, using adaptive optics retinal imaging, we investigated the variations of parietal thickness of small retinal arteries with blood pressure and focal vascular damage.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24406779 PMCID: PMC3966915 DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hypertens ISSN: 0263-6352 Impact factor: 4.844
FIGURE 1Adaptive optics (AO) imaging and segmentation of a retinal arteriole (same patient as in supplementary video 1). (a) Single videoframe (right panel: magnification). Note that parietal structures (between arrowheads in magnification) can be seen (A: arteriole, V: venule; bar, 250 μm). (b) Image averaging and segmentation. (c) Morphogram of the segmented vessel (D: diameter; L: length).
Clinical and morphometric characteristics of the study population (mean ±SD)
| Total | Normotensive | Hypertensive | ||
| 49 (23F, 26M) | 30 (15F, 15M) | 19 (8F, 11M) | ||
| Age (years) | 44.9 ± 14.4 | 42.3 ± 15 | 48 ± 11 | NS |
| BMI | 24.9 ± 4.7 | 23.8 ± 4.5 | 26.4 ± 4 | NS |
| SBP (mmHg) | 132.5 ± 22.2 | 118 ± 13 | 154 ± 14 | <0.01 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 82.6 ± 14 | 74 ± 9.5 | 95.5 ± 10 | <0.01 |
| Mean BP (mmHg) | 99 ± 16 | 88.8 ± 10 | 113.8 ± 11 | <0.01 |
| Pulse BP (mmHg) | 49.9 ± 12 | 43.7 ± 9 | 58.9 ± 11 | <0.01 |
| D (μm) | 79.8 ± 12 | 83.5 ± 11.2 | 74 ± 12.6 | <0.05 |
| P (μm) | 24.3 ± 3.7 | 23.5 ± 3.7 | 25.5 ± 3.3 | NS |
| WLR | 0.31 ± 0.07 | 0.285 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.08 | <0.01 |
| WCSA (μm2) | 3411 ± 874 | 3459 ± 915 | 3338 ± 826 | NS |
BP, blood pressure; D, diameter; NS, not statistically significant; P, parietal thickness; WCSA, wall cross-sectional surface; WLR, wall-to-lumen ratio.
*Between normo and hypertensive.
FIGURE 2Mean blood pressure plotted against parietal (P), diameter (D) and wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR). Pearson's correlation coefficients are inserted. All regressions lines are statistically significant (P < 0.01).
Univariate correlations between clinical and morphometric parameters
| D | P | WLR | WCSA | |
| Age | −0.173 | 0.331 | 0.348 | 0.183 |
| BMI | −0.254 | 0.241 | 0.342 | 0 |
| SBP | −0.384 | 0.438 | 0.582 | 0.13 |
| DBP | −0.362 | 0.437 | 0.559 | 0.06 |
| Mean BP | −0.385 | 0.453 | 0.589 | 0.05 |
| Pulse pressure | −0.275 | 0.283 | 0.406 | 0.01 |
D, diameter; P, parietal thickness; WCSA, wall cross-sectional area; WLR, wall-to-lumen ratio.
*P < 0.05.
**P < 0.01.
FIGURE 3Representative adaptive optics (AO) imaging of arteriovenous crossings. Arrowheads bracket the arteriolar wall. (a) Normal arteriovenous crossing (right panel: magnification). (b) Representative cases of arteriovenous nicking (AVN). Note the focal venous narrowings (asterisks) upstream and downstream of the arteriovenous overlap. (c) Case of venous nicking occurring in the immediate vicinity of an arteriole in the absence of arteriovenous overlapping, allowing the direct observation of the arteriovenous interface; note the gap between the arteriolar wall and the vein, suggesting that there is not direct contact (bars, 125 μm; additional cases are shown in supplementary Figure 1).
FIGURE 4(a) Adaptive optics (AO) NIR imaging of two representative cases of focal arteriolar narrowings (FANs) with their corresponding morphograms (arrowheads in AO images and in morphograms show lumen narrowing). In both cases, the parallelism of the inner and outer vascular limits was maintained. There was no detectable increase of WCSA at the site of FAN (bar, 100 μm; see also supplementary Figure 2). (b): comparison of wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR) between the superotemporal artery (STA), AVN (n = 12) and FANs (n = 10). The difference between groups is statistically significant (P < 0.01).
Comparison of adaptive optics data from the present study and scanning laser Doppler flowmetry data from Ritt et al.[16]
| Present study | Ritt 2008 | |||
| Normotensive | Hypertensive | Normotensive | Hypertensive | |
| 30 | 29 | |||
| Age | 42.3 ± 15 | 36.7 ± 5.9 | ||
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 118 ± 13 | 129 ± 6.9 | ||
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 74 ± 9.5 | 77.8 ± 7.6 | ||
| WLR | 0.285 ± 0.05 | 0.28 ± 0.1 | ||
| Lumen diameter (μm) | 83.5 ± 11.2 | 85.3 ± 11 | ||
| Wall cross-sectional area (μ2) | 3459 ± 915 | 3740 ± 1415 | ||
| 19 | 21 | |||
| Age | 48 ± 11 | 39.1 ± 5.4 | ||
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 154 ± 14 | 145 ± 6.8 | ||
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 95.5 ± 10 | 87.7 ± 8.3 | ||
| WLR | 0.36 ± 0.08 | 0.36 ± 0.1 | ||
| Lumen diameter (μm) | 74 ± 12.6 | 81.8 ± 7.8 | ||
| Wall cross-sectional area (μ2) | 3338 ± 826 | 4413 ± 1725 | ||