Literature DB >> 24406264

Comparison of tissue effects in rabbit muscle of surgical dissection devices.

Christian A Bowers1, Greg Burns2, Karen L Salzman3, Lawrence D McGill4, Joel D Macdonald5.   

Abstract

While some energy-based surgical dissection and coagulation modalities may offer excellent cutting and coagulation abilities, the impact on healing may differ among devices. We compared the tissue effects of three of these modalities with those of the standard surgical scalpel in rabbit muscle at 24 h and 14 days after surgery by evaluating radiographic and histological data. Linear incisions were made with each device in the dorsal lumbar musculature of rabbits using monopolar electrocautery in cut mode (MPE-Cut) and coagulation mode (MPE-Coag), a ferromagnetic induction loop (FMI), and a traditional scalpel. Magnetic resonance imaging scans and histological sampling were done at 24 h and 14 days. Subjective cutting and coagulation characteristics for each device were also recorded during surgery. The scalpel and FMI appeared to cause the least tissue damage adjacent to the incisions in rabbit dorsal lumbar musculature. The scalpel showed the best healing, while the FMI and MPE-Cut demonstrated good healing. The MPE-Coag showed the worst tissue healing. The scalpel, FMI, and MPE-Cut all exhibited favorable subjective characteristics during surgery. It appears that the FMI may be a better choice for surgical dissection and coagulation in muscle tissue than the MPE coagulation mode because it shows less tissue damage and offers better tissue healing.
Copyright © 2014 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cautery; Electrosurgical device; Ferromagnetic induction loop; Monopolar electrocautery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24406264     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  5 in total

1.  Electrosurgery reduces blood loss and immediate postoperative inflammation compared to cold instruments for midline celiotomy in dogs: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lee B Meakin; Jo C Murrell; Ivan C P Doran; Toby G Knowles; Michael S Tivers; Guillaume P A Chanoit
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 1.495

2.  Validation of a Laparoscopic Ferromagnetic Technology-based Vessel Sealing Device and Comparative Study to Ultrasonic and Bipolar Laparoscopic Devices.

Authors:  Jennwood Chen; Curtis R Jensen; Preston K Manwaring; Robert E Glasgow
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  Clinical outcome of biportal endoscopic revisional lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Min-Seok Kang; Jin-Ho Hwang; Dae-Jung Choi; Hoon-Jae Chung; Jong-Hwa Lee; Hyong-Nyun Kim; Hyun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Bigger Is Not Always Better: Effects of Electrocautery Setting on Tissue Injury in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Austin L Shiver; Colton Webber; Taylor Sliker; Patrick Rushford; Aaron Shaw
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 5.  Advances and safe use of energy devices in lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Takahiro Homma
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-02-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.