Histone deacetylase (HDAC) proteins are promising targets for cancer treatment, as shown by the approval of two HDAC inhibitors for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. HDAC1 in particular has been linked to cell growth and cell cycle regulation and is therefore an attractive target for anticancer drugs. The HDAC1 active site contains a hydrophobic 11 Å active-site channel, with a 14 Å internal cavity at the bottom of the active site. Several computational and biochemical studies have proposed an acetate-escape hypothesis where the acetate byproduct of the deacetylation reaction escapes via the 14 Å internal cavity. Selective HDAC inhibitors that bind to the 14 Å cavity have also been created. To understand the influence of amino acids lining the HDAC1 14 Å cavity in acetate escape and inhibitor binding, we used mutagenesis coupled with acetate competition assays. The results indicate that amino acids lining the 14 Å cavity are critical for catalytic activity and acetate competition, confirming the role of the cavity in acetate escape. In addition, these mutagenesis studies will aid in HDAC1-inhibitor design that exploits the 14 Å cavity.
Histone deacetylase (HDAC) proteins are promising targets for cancer treatment, as shown by the approval of two HDAC inhibitors for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. HDAC1 in particular has been linked to cell growth and cell cycle regulation and is therefore an attractive target for anticancer drugs. The HDAC1 active site contains a hydrophobic 11 Å active-site channel, with a 14 Å internal cavity at the bottom of the active site. Several computational and biochemical studies have proposed an acetate-escape hypothesis where the acetate byproduct of the deacetylation reaction escapes via the 14 Å internal cavity. Selective HDAC inhibitors that bind to the 14 Å cavity have also been created. To understand the influence of amino acids lining the HDAC1 14 Å cavity in acetate escape and inhibitor binding, we used mutagenesis coupled with acetate competition assays. The results indicate that amino acids lining the 14 Å cavity are critical for catalytic activity and acetate competition, confirming the role of the cavity in acetate escape. In addition, these mutagenesis studies will aid in HDAC1-inhibitor design that exploits the 14 Å cavity.
Acetylation of the
ε-amino group of specific lysine residues
on histone proteins can influence gene expression by modulating chromatin
structure.[1] Two classes of enzymes, histone
acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase (HDAC), mediate the balance
between acetylated and deacetylated states. Deacetylase-mediated removal
of acetyl groups is generally linked to gene repression.[2] Several studies have shown that inhibiting deacetylation
in tumor cells leads to cell differentiation and reduced cell growth,
making HDAC proteins attractive anticancer targets.[2−4] Currently, two
HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat[5] and romidepsin[6] (Figure 1A), are approved
as cancer therapeutics. The discovery of additional HDAC inhibitors
for cancer therapy is a promising area of research.[7]
Figure 1
(A) Structures of two HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat and romidepsin.
(B) Docked image of vorinostat (red, ball and stick) in the HDAC1
crystal structure (purple mesh; PBD 4BKX). Vorinostat is bound in the 11 Å
active-site channel, whereas the 14 Å internal cavity is located
adjacent to the catalytic metal (gray sphere).
(A) Structures of two HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat and romidepsin.
(B) Docked image of vorinostat (red, ball and stick) in the HDAC1
crystal structure (purple mesh; PBD 4BKX). Vorinostat is bound in the 11 Å
active-site channel, whereas the 14 Å internal cavity is located
adjacent to the catalytic metal (gray sphere).Phylogenetically, HDAC proteins are grouped into four main
classes.[8] Class I HDAC proteins are homologous
to yeastRpd3 and include HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, and HDAC8.[9−12] HDAC4, HDAC5, HDAC6, HDAC7, and
HDAC9 belong to the class II subfamily and have sequence homology
to yeastHda1.[13−15] HDAC11 is the only class IV member with similarities
to both classes I and II.[16,17] With similar metal-dependent
catalytic mechanisms, most HDAC inhibitors display broad activity
against all isoforms.[18] Ultimately, the
discovery of isoform-selective inhibitors will be more focused if
the involvement of each HDAC isoform in cancer formation is well-characterized.Among the class I HDAC isoforms, HDAC1 is an important player in
cancer. For example, HDAC1-knockout embryonic mouse cells were nonviable,
with retarded growth and reduced proliferative rates.[19] Mouse fibroblast cells lacking HDAC1 were antiproliferative
and exhibited G1 cell cycle arrest accompanied by upregulation of
cell cycle regulators p21 and p57.[20] Aberrant
cell cycle regulation and proliferation are hallmarks of cancer formation,
making HDAC1 an exciting target for anticancer drug design. HDAC1
is also overexpressed in a variety of cancer tissues, including ovarian,[21,22] prostate,[23] pancreas,[24] and leukemia.[25]With its
significant role in cancer-related events, HDAC1-selective
inhibitors would be valuable tools to study cancer cell biology as
well as to provide lead compounds for improved anticancer therapies.
Efforts to design selective inhibitors have been frustrated by the
slow progress in structural characterization. Crystal structures have
been reported to date for HDAC2, HDAC3, HDAC4, HDAC7, HDAC8,[26−31] and, very recently, HDAC1.[32] In addition,
homology models of the HDAC isoforms have been helpful in inhibitor
design.[33,34] The crystal structure of HDAC1 revealed
that the active site contains a hydrophobic 11 Å channel with
a catalytic metal ion (Figure 1B). HDAC inhibitors
have been designed that fit in this long channel by making favorable
hydrophobic interactions with amino acids lining the channel along
with chelation to the metal ion.At the bottom of the active
site and next to the catalytic metal
ion is the 14 Å internal cavity (Figure 1B), which is postulated to allow the acetate byproduct of the deacetylation
reaction to escape.[29,35,36] Specifically, computational studies using the HDAC1 homology model
identified amino acids in the 14 Å cavity that are likely to
facilitate acetate escape by forming favorable ionic interactions.[35] Acetate-docking studies further revealed important
ionic interactions with several 14 Å cavity residues, including
R27 and R16 in HDLP.[35,37] Interestingly, HDAC inhibitors
containing substituents that fit into the 14 Å cavity have shown
isoform selectivity.[38−40] The implications for these finding is that novel
HDAC inhibitors can be designed to exploit the 14 Å cavity.[39] Although the 14 Å cavity of HDAC1 may play
a critical role in acetate escape and impart selective substrate/inhibitor
binding, experimental studies probing the 14 Å cavity of HDAC1
are lacking.To understand the contribution of residues lining
the 14 Å
cavity of HDAC1 to catalytic activity and protein associations, the
recently published HDAC1 crystal structure was used to identify amino
acids residing in the cavity. Alanine single point mutants of 14 Å
cavity residues were generated and tested for deacetylase activity.
Furthermore, we performed acetate competition assays to determine
whether alanine mutants affect HDAC1 binding to acetate. The results
suggest that amino acids lining the 14 Å cavity are important
to maintain HDAC1 catalytic activity and acetate escape.
Results
Residues in
the 14 Å Cavity of HDAC1 Are Critical for Activity
Computational
and crystallography studies predicted that HDAC1
Y23 and R34 form a charged pocket in the 14 Å cavity and bind
to, and thereby stabilize, the acetate byproduct of the deacetylation
reaction (Figure 2A, yellow residues).[35] Polar residues Y24 and C151 were also speculated
to line the opposite side of the 14 Å cavity to influence acetate
binding and to restore the active-site configuration after reaction
(Figure 2A, yellow residues). In addition,
these four amino acids might influence substrate binding and orientation
as a result of their close proximity to the active site. Among these
four residues, R34 and C151 are almost strictly conserved among all
HDAC isoforms (92 and 100% identity, Figure 2B), whereas Y23 and Y24 are poorly conserved (Figure 2B).
Figure 2
(A) Amino acid residues in the 14 Å cavity of HDAC1 that are
mutated in this study (yellow and green, ball and stick structures)
are highlighted in the HDAC1 crystal structure (shown as purple mesh, 4BKX). The metal ion
required for catalysis is shown as a gray sphere. (B) Catalytic domains
of the class I, II, and IV human HDAC proteins were aligned (ClustalW),
and residues located in the 14 Å internal cavity are shown. Residues
differing from the most highly conserved at each position are highlighted
in red. The numbering at the top is for HDAC1. (Genbank accession
numbers: HDAC1, Q13547.1; HDAC2, Q92769.2; HDAC3, NP_003874.2; HDAC4, AAD29046.1; HDAC5, AAD29047.1; HDAC6, AAD29048.1; HDAC7, NP_056216.2; HDAC8, CAB90213.1; HDAC9, AAK66821.1; HDAC10, NP_114408.3; and HDAC11, NP_079103.2.)
(A) Amino acid residues in the 14 Å cavity of HDAC1 that are
mutated in this study (yellow and green, ball and stick structures)
are highlighted in the HDAC1 crystal structure (shown as purple mesh, 4BKX). The metal ion
required for catalysis is shown as a gray sphere. (B) Catalytic domains
of the class I, II, and IV humanHDAC proteins were aligned (ClustalW),
and residues located in the 14 Å internal cavity are shown. Residues
differing from the most highly conserved at each position are highlighted
in red. The numbering at the top is for HDAC1. (Genbank accession
numbers: HDAC1, Q13547.1; HDAC2, Q92769.2; HDAC3, NP_003874.2; HDAC4, AAD29046.1; HDAC5, AAD29047.1; HDAC6, AAD29048.1; HDAC7, NP_056216.2; HDAC8, CAB90213.1; HDAC9, AAK66821.1; HDAC10, NP_114408.3; and HDAC11, NP_079103.2.)To determine the influence of Y23, Y24, R34, and C151 on
HDAC1
enzymatic activity, each amino acid was individually mutated to alanine,
and the mutants were tested for deactylation activity. Briefly, alanine
mutants or wild-type HDAC1 were expressed in T-Ag Jurkat cells as
FLAG-tagged fusion proteins, immunoprecipitated with α-FLAG
agarose beads, and tested for deacetylase activity using an in vitro
fluoresence assay, as previously described.[41] The catalytically inactive mutant H141A was included for comparison.[42] Alanine mutation of all four residues significantly
reduced HDAC1 catalytic activity (Figure 3A
and Table S1). The highly conserved R34A
and C151A mutants demonstrated 31 and 21% remaining activity, respectively,
compared to wild type (100%), which was similar to inactive H141A
(20%). Mutating Y23 and Y24 to alanine also led to mutants with 35
and 26% catalytic activity remaining, respectively. The HDAC1 homology
model predicts that R34 and C151 are closer to the active site, whereas
Y23 and Y24 exist closer to the solvent-exposed region of the 14 Å
cavity (Figure 2A, yellow residues). Despite
their position, the alanine-scan results indicate that Y23, Y24, R34,
and C151 are critical to maintain the catalytic activity of HDAC1.
Figure 3
Y23A, Y24A, R34A, and C151A mutants affect
HDAC1 deacetylase activity
but not protein association. (A) Wild-type or mutant proteins were
expressed in T-Ag Jurkat cells as FLAG-tagged fusion proteins, immunoprecipitated
with anti-FLAG-agarose beads, and tested for catalytic activity using
an in vitro fluorescence assay (histogram) or separated on SDS-PAGE
and probed with anti-FLAG antibody (gel image). The histogram shows
the mean percent of at least four independent trials, which were normalized
to wild-type deacetylase activity (set to 100%). The standard error
is shown as error bars (Table S1). (B).
Immunoprecipitates of wild type and alanine mutants in panel A were
further probed with anti-FLAG, anti-RbAp48, or anti-mSin3A antibodies
to assess protein association.
Mutation of 14 Å Cavity Residues Does Not Influence Protein
Associations
The mammalian corepressor proteins mSin3A and
RbAp48 tie HDAC1 to promoter-bound transcription factors, leading
to transcriptional gene silencing.[42−45] The binding of HDAC1 to corepressors
not only recruits the deacetylase to promoter regions but also leads
to an increase in deacetylase activity.[43] To test whether the reduced activity observed with Y23A, Y24A, R34A,
and C151A mutants was due to poor binding to associating partners,
biochemical purification was performed. HDAC wild type or mutants
were immunoprecipitated with FLAG-agarose beads, separated on SDS-PAGE,
and probed with mSin3A or RbAp48 antibodies. All four mutants displayed
an equal ability to coimmunoprecipitate mSin3A and RbAp48, independent
of deacetylase activity (Figure 3B, compare
the wild type to mutant lanes). As a control, HDAC1H141A recovered
levels of mSin3A and RbAp48 comparable to the wild type (Figure 3B, compare wild type to H141A lanes), as previously
reported.[41] The results suggest that the
reduced activity of HDAC1 mutants is independent of corepressor binding.
In addition, the data suggest that the global structure of the mutants
is not significantly disturbed.Y23A, Y24A, R34A, and C151A mutants affect
HDAC1 deacetylase activity
but not protein association. (A) Wild-type or mutant proteins were
expressed in T-Ag Jurkat cells as FLAG-tagged fusion proteins, immunoprecipitated
with anti-FLAG-agarose beads, and tested for catalytic activity using
an in vitro fluorescence assay (histogram) or separated on SDS-PAGE
and probed with anti-FLAG antibody (gel image). The histogram shows
the mean percent of at least four independent trials, which were normalized
to wild-type deacetylase activity (set to 100%). The standard error
is shown as error bars (Table S1). (B).
Immunoprecipitates of wild type and alanine mutants in panel A were
further probed with anti-FLAG, anti-RbAp48, or anti-mSin3A antibodies
to assess protein association.
Additional Residues in the 14 Å Cavity of HDAC1 Are Also
Critical for Activity
In addition to Y23, Y24, R34, and C151,
multiple residues comprise the remainder of the 14 Å cavity.
The HDAC1 crystal structure was used to identify V19, M30, I35, F109,
L139, and Y303 in the 14 Å cavity (Figure 2A, green residues). These amino acids are hydrophobic or polar and
are therefore not expected to participate as critically in acetate
binding. However, because of their proximity to the active site, these
amino acids may influence substrate binding and restoration of the
active-site configuration. We were also interested in testing the
role of R36 and S113 in HDAC1 activity. Although the crystal structure
shows that the guanidinium side chain of R36 is positioned away from
the 14 Å cavity (Figure 2B), earlier studies
suggested that it resides in the cavity.[33] In the case of S113, computational studies with an HDAC1 homology
model suggested that the amino acid at position 113 dictates selective
binding of HDAC inhibitors into the 14 Å cavity.[39] Therefore, mutagenesis studies with residues comprising
the 14 Å cavity, including S113, may assist in future inhibitor-design
efforts.To determine the influence of V19, M30, I35, R36, S113,
F109, L139, and Y303 on HDAC1 enzymatic activity, each amino acid
was individually mutated to alanine, overexpressed in T-Ag Jurkat
cells, immunoprecipitated, and tested for activity, as discussed earlier.
All mutants displayed reduced HDAC1 catalytic activity (Figure 4A and Table S2). Alanine
replacement of strictly conserved Y303 resulted in a mutant displaying
6% remaining activity relative to wild type (100%). The homology model
predicts that Y303 is positioned at the junction of the 11 Å
active-site channel and the 14 Å cavity (Figure 2A), and the hydroxyl group of Y303 is thought to stabilize
the hemiketal intermediate produced during the deacetylation reaction
through hydrogen bonding,[36] which is consistent
with its role in maintaining activity. Likewise, the V19A, M30A, I35A,
F109A, and L139A mutants displayed between 6 and 39% deacetylase activities,
which are comparable to the inactive H141A mutant (20%) and suggest
that all are important for HDAC1 deacetylase activity. Although the
crystal structure suggests that the guanidinium side chain of R36
is positioned away from the 14 Å cavity, the R36A mutant displayed
only 25% deacetylases activity, suggesting that it plays a supportive
role. Finally, the S113A mutant was the most active of this series,
maintaining 62% deacetylase activities. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments
with the alanine mutants also confirmed that protein associations
were unaltered (Figure 4B). The combined mutagenesis
data suggests that seven out of eight 14 Å cavity mutants tested
are critical for maintaining HDAC1 enzymatic activity.
Figure 4
Additional 14 Å
cavity alanine mutants affect HDAC1 deacetylase
activity but have no effect on the protein association. (A) Wild-type
or mutant proteins were expressed in T-Ag Jurkat cells as FLAG-tagged
fusion proteins, immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG-agarose beads,
and tested for catalytic activity using an in vitro fluorescence assay
(histogram) or separated on SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-FLAG antibody
(gel image). The histogram shows the mean percent of at least four
independent trials normalized to wild-type deacetylase activity (set
to 100%). The standard error is shown with error bars (Table S2). (B) Immunoprecipitates from panel
A were further probed with anti-FLAG, anti-RbAp48, and anti-mSin3A
antibodies to assess protein association.
Additional 14 Å
cavity alanine mutants affect HDAC1 deacetylase
activity but have no effect on the protein association. (A) Wild-type
or mutant proteins were expressed in T-Ag Jurkat cells as FLAG-tagged
fusion proteins, immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG-agarose beads,
and tested for catalytic activity using an in vitro fluorescence assay
(histogram) or separated on SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-FLAG antibody
(gel image). The histogram shows the mean percent of at least four
independent trials normalized to wild-type deacetylase activity (set
to 100%). The standard error is shown with error bars (Table S2). (B) Immunoprecipitates from panel
A were further probed with anti-FLAG, anti-RbAp48, and anti-mSin3A
antibodies to assess protein association.
Substitution Mutants of 14 Å Cavity Residues Are Also Inactive
Consistent with the acetate-escape hypothesis, acetate could form
favorable electrostatic interactions with charged or polar residues
within the cavity, including Y23, Y24, R34, R36, C151, and Y303. Accordingly,
substitution of these residues to the similar charged or polar functional
groups could promote favorable interactions with acetate and maintain
enzymatic activity. To probe this possibility, several substitution
mutants were created. Residues R34 and R36 were replaced with lysine
to retain positive charge. Similarly, C151 was replaced by serine
to maintain polarity. In the case of Y23, Y24, and Y303, phenylalanine
substitution mutants would preserve aromaticity while removing polarity.
Alternatively, replacement of Y23 with cysteine, histidine, or arginine
would maintain polarity, charge, and/or aromaticity. In total, substitution
mutants were created to probe the role of charge, polarity, and aromaticity
in the 14 Å cavity on activity.The Y23F, Y23C, Y23H, Y23R,
Y24F, R34K, R36K, C151S, and Y303F single-point HDAC1 mutants were
expressed in T-Ag Jurkat cells as FLAG-tagged fusion proteins, immunoprecipitated
with FLAG-agarose beads, and tested for deacetylase activity using
an in vitro fluoresence assay, as described earlier (Figure 5A and Table S3). The
substitution mutants significantly influenced HDAC1 catalytic activity
and, in most cases, displayed similar or lower activities compared
to the alanine mutants (compare Figures 3A
and 5A). In the case of the Y23 mutant series,
Y23C maintained similar activity to the alanine mutant (36 versus
35%), whereas the Y23F and Y23H mutants displayed reduced activity
(12%). Lysine did not compensate for arginine, as shown by the low
activities of the R34K and R36K mutants (17 and 33%, respectively),
which is comparable to the activities of the R34A and R36A mutants
(31 and 25%, respectively). Likewise, the C151A and C151S mutants
demonstrated similar activities (21 and 30%, respectively). Only in
two cases did substitution mutants enhance activity compared to the
corresponding alanine mutants. In comparison to the 26% activity of
Y24A, Y24F displayed 50% activity (a 2-fold increase). More dramatically,
Y303F demonstrated 38% activity compared to the 6% activity of Y303A
(a 6-fold increase). All mutants were capable of interacting with
associated proteins mSin3A and RbAp48 (Figure 5B), indicating that they maintain their globular structure. In total,
the mutagenesis data suggests that Y23, R34, R36, and C151 are uniquely
suited to promote HDAC1 deacetylase activity, whereas phenylalanine
partially substitutes for Y24 and Y303.
Figure 5
Substitution mutants
of the 14 Å cavity residues display reduced
activity. (A) Wild-type or mutant proteins were expressed in T-Ag
Jurkat cells as FLAG-tagged fusion proteins, immunoprecipitated with
anti-FLAG-agarose beads, and tested for catalytic activity using an
in vitro fluorescence assay (histogram) or separated on SDS-PAGE and
probed with anti-FLAG antibody (gel image). The histogram shows the
mean percent of at least four independent trials normalized to wild-type
deacetylase activity (set to 100%). The standard error is shown as
error bars (Table S3). (B) Coimmunoprecipitates
of mutants in panel A were probed with anti-FLAG, anti-RbAp48, and
anti-mSin3A antibodies to assess protein association.
Substitution mutants
of the 14 Å cavity residues display reduced
activity. (A) Wild-type or mutant proteins were expressed in T-Ag
Jurkat cells as FLAG-tagged fusion proteins, immunoprecipitated with
anti-FLAG-agarose beads, and tested for catalytic activity using an
in vitro fluorescence assay (histogram) or separated on SDS-PAGE and
probed with anti-FLAG antibody (gel image). The histogram shows the
mean percent of at least four independent trials normalized to wild-type
deacetylase activity (set to 100%). The standard error is shown as
error bars (Table S3). (B) Coimmunoprecipitates
of mutants in panel A were probed with anti-FLAG, anti-RbAp48, and
anti-mSin3A antibodies to assess protein association.
Acetate Inhibition Studies
The mutagenesis
results
indicate that amino acids in the 14 Å cavity promote HDAC1 enzymatic
activity. One hypothesis to account for the essential role of the
14 Å cavity in activity is via acetate release after deacetylation.
Prior computational work postulated that charged and polar amino acids
Y23, Y24, R34, R36, and C151 form favorable electrostatic/hydrogen-bond
interactions with acetate.[35,42] To assess experimentally
the influence of 14 Å cavity residues on acetate binding, acetate
inhibition experiments were performed. The expectation was that mutants
would show reduced sensitivity to acetate inhibition compared to wild-type
HDAC1 if each residue plays a role in acetate binding. As a critical
control, the partially active F205Y mutant was included because of
its location in the solvent-exposed surface of the 11 Å channel;[41] F205 mutation should not influence acetate release
and, consequently, should demonstrate identical acetate inhibition
sensitivity compared to wild-type HDAC1.To test the role of
14 Å cavity mutants in acetate release experimentally, wild-type
or mutant proteins were immunoprecipitated with FLAG-agarose beads,
and the extent of inhibition by acetate was determined using dose–response
curves (Table 1, Figure
S1, and Tables S4–S10). Mutant proteins displayed reduced
sensitivity to acetate inhibition. The Y23A, Y24A, and R34A mutants
were the most insensitive to acetate inhibition, with roughly 3-fold
reduced IC50 values (Table 1, 19–21
mM) compared to the wild type (7.2 mM). The R36A and C151A mutants
also showed a roughly 2-fold reduction in acetate inhibition compared
to the wild type (Table 1). As a critical control,
the F205Y mutation that is located in the 11 Å channel and not
expected to influence acetate release displayed identical acetate
inhibition sensitivity as wild-type HDAC1 (Table 1, 7.2 and 8.0 mM). Collectively, the acetate competition data
suggest that both charged and polar amino acid residues in the 14
Å cavity influence HDAC1 binding to acetate. These experimental
studies are consistent with earlier computational work documenting
the involvement of the HDAC1 14 Å cavity in acetate release.[46]
Table 1
Acetate Inhibition
Experiments
sample
IC50 (mM)
wild
type
7.2 ± 0.54
HDAC1 F205Y
8.0 ± 1.5
HDAC1 Y23A
21 ± 1.5
HDAC1 Y24A
19 ± 1.1
HDAC1 R34A
21 ± 1.6
HDAC1 R36A
16 ± 1.3
HDAC1 C151A
13 ± 1.1
IC50 values from at least
three independent trials are shown with standard error. Dose-dependent
curves and data are shown in Figure S1 and Tables
S4–S10.
IC50 values from at least
three independent trials are shown with standard error. Dose-dependent
curves and data are shown in Figure S1 and Tables
S4–S10.
Inhibitor Selectivity
Study
Several inhibitors with
selectivity to HDAC1 and HDAC2 have been reported, where isoform preference
was attributed to interactions with residues in the 14 Å cavity.[38−40,47] In one study, docking experiments
suggested that the HDAC1/2-selecitivity was due to variable amino
acids present at the position corresponding to S113 in HDAC1 (Figure 2B).[39] Specifically, HDAC3
positions a tyrosine at that position, and the docking analysis suggested
that the larger size of tyrosine blocks access of the inhibitor to
the 14 Å cavity, explaining the >1400-fold selectivity against
HDAC3. Interestingly, the relatively small alanine residue is found
at the corresponding position in HDAC4–7, yet several inhibitors
in the series, including 2-thiophenyl biaryl inhibitor 1 (Figure 6A), also demonstrated >1400-fold
selectivity against HDAC4–8. The fact that HDAC4–7 display
alanine at the position corresponding to S113 in HDAC1 yet bind 1 poorly is inconsistent with the proposed hypothesis that
HDAC1/2-selecitivity is due to the steric size of amino acids at this
position.
Figure 6
Inhibitory potency of 1 against wild-type and S113A
HDAC1. (A) Structure of HDAC1/2-selective compound 1.
(B) Wild-type (closed circles) or S113A (open circles) proteins were
expressed in T-Ag Jurkat cells as FLAG-tagged fusion proteins, immunoprecipitated
with anti-FLAG-agarose beads, and tested for catalytic activity using
an in vitro chemiluminescence assay in the absence or presences of
increasing concentrations of 1. Dose–response
curves of from three independent trials with error bars indicating
standard error are shown (Tables S11 and 12).
Inhibitory potency of 1 against wild-type and S113AHDAC1. (A) Structure of HDAC1/2-selective compound 1.
(B) Wild-type (closed circles) or S113A (open circles) proteins were
expressed in T-Ag Jurkat cells as FLAG-tagged fusion proteins, immunoprecipitated
with anti-FLAG-agarose beads, and tested for catalytic activity using
an in vitro chemiluminescence assay in the absence or presences of
increasing concentrations of 1. Dose–response
curves of from three independent trials with error bars indicating
standard error are shown (Tables S11 and 12).With the availability of the S113AHDAC1 mutant, we tested the
influence of S113 on the selectivity of compound 1 for
HDAC1. Wild-type or S113A mutant proteins were immunoprecipitated
with FLAG-agarose beads, and the extent of inhibition by 1 was determined using dose–response curves (Figure 6B and Tables S11 and S12). Wild-type HDAC1 demonstrated an IC50 value of 40 ±
4 nM, which is similar to prior reports.[39] The S113AHDAC1 mutant demonstrated an IC50 value of
204 ± 20 nM, which is a sensitivity difference of roughly 5-fold
compared to the wild type. Given the 1400-fold inhibitory selectivity
of 1 against the HDAC isoforms containing an alanine
at the corresponding S113 position, the 5-fold difference suggests
that S113 is only a partial determinant of selectivity. These mutagenesis
studies implicate additional 14 Å cavity residues outside of
S113 as critical contributors to selective HDAC1 inhibition by 1.
Discussion
The 14 Å cavities
of HDAC isoforms have long been hypothesized
to act as an exit route for acetate following deacetylation.[35−37,42] In one study, docking showed
that the protonated and charged forms of both acetate and acetic acid
localize next to the catalytic metal ion, R16, and R17 in HDLP. In
contrast, similar studies with N-hydroxyacetamide,
which is neutral and similar in structure to the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat
(Figure 1A), revealed preferred binding in
the 11 Å channel but not the 14 Å cavity.[35] In addition, amino acids located toward the solvent-exposed
regions of the 14 Å cavity demonstrate flexibility, indicating
that side-chain movement of amino acids could exchange cavity contents
with the bulk water solvent for the next cycle of deacetylation.[29,35,36] To date, no experimental data
have confirmed the role of the 14 Å cavity in HDAC1 enzymatic
activity and acetate binding.An alanine scan was used to determine
the influence of 12 amino
acid residues lining the 14 Å cavity of HDAC1 on enzymatic activity
and binding to acetate.[41,46] Eleven of the alanine
mutants (V19A, Y23A, Y24A, M30A, R34A, I35A, R36A, F109A, L139A, C151A,
and Y303A) displayed reduced HDAC1 deacetylase activity, with only
6–39% activity compared to wild type (set at 100%, Figures 3A and 4A). Only one mutant,
S113A, maintained significant deacetylase activity (61% compared to
wild type, Figure 4A). Computational studies
previously suggested that S113 of HDAC1 is responsible for the isoform
selectivity observed by inhibitors that access the 14 Å cavity;[38,39] however, S113 is positioned adjacent to, but not within, the 14
Å cavity in the HDAC1 crystal structure (Figure 2A). In addition, alanine is found at position 113 in six of
the 11 HDAC isoforms (Figure 2B, HDAC4, 5,
6, 7, 9, and 10). Therefore, alanine mutation at S113 may preserve
HDAC activity because of its distal location and presence in other
isoforms. Alanine is also found in other isoforms at position V19
(HDAC10), I35 (HDAC8), R36 (HDAC3), and F109 (HDAC4, 5, 7, and 9);
however, alanine is not well conserved among all HDAC isoforms at
these positions (Figure 2B) and was not tolerated
by HDAC1 (Figure 4A). In total, the results
indicate that residues in the 14 Å cavity are critical for HDAC1
activity, with alanine partially substituting for only S113.Because polar and charged residues lining the 14 Å cavity
are implicated in acetate binding, substitution mutants maintaining
the polarity, charge, or aromaticity of 14 Å cavity residues
were created to probe compensatory activities. Substitution mutants
displayed reduced deacetylase activities compared to wild type, with
similar or lower activity compared to the alanine mutants (Figure 5A). Y24F was the only substitution mutant that maintained
a significant deacetylase activity (50% compared to wild type, Figure 5A). In addition, Y303F maintained 38% activity (Figure 5A), which was 6-fold elevated compared to Y303A.
These substitution studies suggest that aromaticity at positions 24
and 303 plays an important role in the 14 Å cavity, although
the presence of a polar hydroxyl group is also important. The combined
mutagenesis studies suggest that Y23, Y24, R34, R36, C151, and Y303
are each uniquely suited to maintain the full enzymatic activity of
HDAC1.The loss in enzymatic activity of 14 Å cavity mutants
can
be attributed to two possibilities. First, cavity residues might influence
substrate binding or govern the organization of the active-site residues,
which ultimately affects activity. Second, cavity residues might influence
the release of the acetate byproduct. To distinguish between these
possibilities, the influence of mutation on acetate binding was determined.
Alanine mutation of both polar and charged residues reduced acetate
inhibition by 2- to 3-fold compared to wild type, whereas the 11 Å
channel F205Y mutant showed no change. These findings are consistent
with previous work with recombinant HDAC8 where acetate inhibition
was 160-fold reduced with HDAC8R37A (equivalent to R34A in HDAC1)
compared to wild type (IC50 of 400 mM with HDAC8R37A versus
2.5 mM with wild type).[46] The larger fold
difference observed with recombinant HDAC8 compared to mammalianHDAC1
could be a result of the mammalian versus bacterial expression of
the proteins. With both HDAC1 and HDAC8, mutation of 14 Å cavity
residues removed key contacts required for acetate binding, resulting
in reduced acetate inhibitory sensitivities. Combined, the mutagenesis
data is consistent with the hypothesis that the 14 Å cavity plays
a role in acetate binding and release during the deacetylation reaction.In addition to acetate binding, the 14 Å cavity has also been
implicated to transporting water to the HDAC active site.[35] Computational studies with HDAC8 suggested that
R37 (R34 in HDAC1) interacts with nearby residues (G303 and G305 in
HDAC8, for example) to act as a gatekeeper to acetate/water passage.[37,46] Moreover, it was hypothesized that R37 mutation results in the flooding
of the active site with water, which inhibits deacetylation.[46] R34 in the HDAC1 homology model is within hydrogen-bonding
distance of G300; however, the cavity is not gated by this interaction,
as with the HDAC8 structure. More recent computational work with an
HDAC1 homology model predicted aromatic gating of water away from
the 14 Å cavity by Y22, Y24, and F109 (Figure 2A).[48] In addition, water accessibility
was shown to contribute to the binding of hydroxamate-containing inhibitors,
including vorinostat.[49] Combined, it is
interesting to speculate that mutation of residues in the 14 Å
cavity alters the accessibility of water to the active site, perhaps
by perturbing an aromatic-gating mechanism. Indeed, alanine mutants
of putative gatekeeper residues (Y24A and F109A) demonstrated reduced
activity (20–35%, Figures 3A and 4A). In addition, the partial recovery of activity
by the Y24F mutants (Figure 5A, 2-fold) is
consistent with the possibility that aromatic gating plays a role
in maintaining the structure and function of the 14 Å cavity.HDAC1 has been linked to tumorigenesis, making it an attractive
target for cancer therapy. Computational studies have suggested that
HDAC1 and HDAC2 can be selectively targeted through the 14 Å
cavity.[35] Indeed, several inhibitors that
access the 14 Å cavity displayed selectivity for HDAC1 and 2
compared to HDAC3–8.[38−40,47] In these cases, the HDAC1/2-selecitivity was computationally rationalized
because of the presence of S113 in HDAC1 versus tyrosine in HDAC3
(Figure 2B).[39] Interestingly,
alanine is the most abundant residue at position 113, with 60% conservation
(Figure 2B). Despite the relatively small size
of the alanine residue, HDAC4, 5, 6, and 7 demonstrate poor binding
to HDAC1/2-selective inhibitors, which suggests that the size of the
residue at S113 in HDAC1 may only minimally influence selectivity.
To assess the influence of the S113 residue on the selectivity of
inhibitors that access the 14 Å cavity, the potency of HDAC1/2-selective
inhibitor 1 was determined with the HDACS113A mutant.
The data show that the S113A mutant displays only a 5-fold reduced
sensitivity to 1 compared to wild-type HDAC1, which is
significantly less than the observed 1400-fold selectivity of 1 for HDAC1. Therefore, the data suggest that the amino acid
at the S113 position only partially accounts for the observed selectivity.
In fact, the recently published crystal structure of HDAC1 positions
S113 adjacent to, but not within, the 14 Å cavity (Figure 2A). Combined, the current evidence suggests that
structural features in the 14 Å cavity other than the S113 residue
likely govern selectivity.A more recent study reported HDAC8-selective
inhibitors that bind
the 14 Å cavity.[37] In this case, selectivity
was attributed to π-stacking interactions between the inhibitor
and W141 in HDAC8 (aligned with L139 in HDAC1). Among the isoforms,
only HDAC11 also contains an aromatic residue at this position (F141),
whereas all others display either glycine (60% conservation) or leucine
(25% conservation, Figure 2B). The HDAC1L139A
mutant displayed weak activity (39%, Figure 4A), implicating structural differences in this region of the 14 Å
cavity. In total, the mutagenesis studies here are consistent with
prior work suggesting that residues at the base of the 14 Å cavity
impart unique structural features that can be exploited in isoform
selective inhibitor design. Future studies that elucidate critical
14 Å cavity residues involved in inhibitor binding will be helpful
to create additional selective HDAC inhibitors.The acetate
competition results presented here also suggest that
acetate mimics appended near the metal-binding moiety of HDAC inhibitors
may interact with 14 Å cavity residues to enhance binding affinity.
To date, inhibitors with aromatic groups adjacent to the metal-binding
moiety were designed to access the 14 Å cavity (Figure 6A).[38,39] Creation of HDAC inhibitors displaying
acetate mimics may enhance binding affinity while also influencing
selectivity. Given the wide interest in HDAC inhibitors as pharmacological
tools and anticancer drugs, inhibitor design exploiting structural
differences and favorable binding interactions in the 14 Å cavity
is an exciting future area of development.
Experimental
Procedures
Mutagenesis, Mammalian Expression, and Western Blot Analysis
of HDAC1 Mutants
HDAC1 single point mutants were cloned into
the pBJ5HDAC1-FLAG expression plasmid using NotI
and EcoRI restriction sites, as previously described.[41] All mutants were confirmed by DNA sequencing
(see the Supporting Information for primer
sequences). T-Ag Jurkat cells[50] were grown
in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% anti-mycotic (GIBCO)
at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 environment. Plasmid DNA (20
μg, pBJ5HDAC1-FLAG or mutants) was separately transiently transfected
into 40 × 106 cells by electroporation. After a 48
h growth period, the cells were harvested, washed with PBS (137 mM
NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 4.3 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.4 mM
KH2PO4, pH 7.3), and used immediately or stored
at −80 °C until use. Cells were lysed in 1 mL of cold
Jurkat lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol,
and 0.5% Triton X-100) containing 1× protease inhibitor cocktail
set V (Calbiochem) at 4 °C for 10 min with rotation before centrifugation
to collect the soluble lysate. Anti-FLAG agarose beads (10 μL
of bead slurry, Sigma) were used to immunoprecipitate HDAC1-FLAG wild-type
or mutant proteins from the lysates. Immunoprecipitated proteins were
split into two equal portions. One portion was used in the HDAC activity
assay described below, whereas the second portion was separated using
10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to a PVDF membrane (Immobilon P, Millipore),
and probed with anti-Flag (Sigma), anti-mSin3A (Santa Cruz), or anti-RbAp48
(Sigma) antibodies.
HDAC Activity Assay
The Fluor de
Lys fluorescence activity
assay (Biomol) was used to determine HDAC activity by following the
manufacturer’s protocol. Immunoprecipitated proteins (approximately
20 μg) were incubated with HDAC assay buffer (25 μL) and
Fluor de Lys substrate (25 μL of 100 μM) at 37 °C
for 45 min with shaking (900 rpm). Then, developer (50 μL of
a 1× solution) was added and incubated for 5 min. Fluorescence
signal was measured using the GENios Plus plate-reader fluorimeter
(Tecan). The fluorescence signal was background-corrected against
a reaction containing HDAC assay buffer, substrate, and developer
but no HDAC enzyme. The background-corrected signal from each mutant
was normalized to the wild type (set at 100%). The mean and standard
error from at least three independent trials are shown in Figures 3–5 (Tables S1–S3).
Acetate Inhibition Assays
To perform the acetate inhibition
assays, the HDAC activity assay was performed as described[51−53] with a few modifications. In this case, HDAC or mutant proteins
were immunoprecipitated from a 40 × 106 cell transfection
using 40 μL of anti-Flag beads (Sigma) and were then split into
five equal aliquots. Each immunoprecipitate aliquot was preincubated
with HDAC assay buffer (25 μL) in the absence or presence of
sodium acetate for 15 min at 37 °C with shaking (900 rpm). The
Fluor de Lys substrate was then added and incubated as described for
the fluorescence activity assay. The concentrations of sodium acetate
used are shown in Tables S4–S10 and
represent the final concentrations after addition of substrate. The
deacetylase reaction was developed and analyzed as described above.
All reactions in either the presence or absence of sodium acetate
were background-corrected to a reaction containing HDAC assay buffer,
substrate, and developer but no HDAC enzyme. Percent inhibition was
determined by dividing the fluorescence signal at each acetate concentration
to the no acetate control for each mutant and then multiplying by
100 (Tables S4–S10). Standard error
from at least three independent trials is shown (Tables S4–S10). IC50 values were determined
by fitting the data to a sigmoidal curve using Kaleidograph software
(Figure S1).
Compound 1 Inhibition Assays
The inhibition
studies with compound 1 were performed with the HDAC-Glo
chemiluminescence assay (Promega). FLAG-tagged wild-type and S113A
mutant proteins were immunoprecipitated and divided into aliquots,
as described for the acetate studies. Then, each immunoprecipitated
protein aliquot was incubated with HDAC-Glo assay buffer (24 μL)
and varying concentrations of 1 (1 μL). The concentrations
of 1 used are shown in Tables S11
and S12 and represent the final concentrations after addition
of substrate/developer solution. Because of the slow binding kinetics
of benzamides, compound 1 was preincubated with the immunoprecipitated
enzyme for 2 h at 30 °C with shaking (900 rpm). Then, the substrate/developer
solution (2 μL of 100 μM substrate containing a 1000-fold
dilution of developer) was added and incubated at 30 °C for 30
min with shaking (900 rpm). Chemiluminescence signal was measured
using the GENios Plus plate-reader fluorimeter (Tecan). The reactions
were analyzed as described for the acetate inhibition experiments
(Tables S11 and S12).
Docking Study
The crystal structure for HDAC1 was downloaded
from the RCSB Protein Data Bank (HDAC1PDB ID: 4BKX). PyMOL (Schrodinger,
LLC) was used to delete the MTA1 corepressor chain, acetate, and potassium
and sulfate ions in the HDAC1 crystal structure. AutoDockTools-1.5.4
program[54,55] was used to add all hydrogen atoms, modify
histidine protonation (H140 and H141) by adding only HD1, compute
Gasteiger charges, and merge all nonpolar hydrogen followed by generation
of the pdbqt output file. The charge of the zinc atom was manually
changed from zero to +2. A grid box with a spacing of 0.375 Å,
size of 56 × 42 × 38, and coordinates for the center of
the grid box (−48.000, 18.000, −3.750) were used. AutoGrid
4.2 was used to precalculate and generate the grid maps files required
for the docking calculations. Vorinostat was drawn in ChemBioDraw
Ultra, and Chem 3D Pro was used to run MM2 for energy minimization.
Then, AutoDockTools-1.5.4 was used to add hydrogens, compute Gasteiger
charges, merge nonpolar hydrogens, choose torsions, and generate the
pdbqt file. All acyclic bonds were made rotatable except the amide
bonds. AutoDock 4.2[55] was used to perform
the docking calculations using a genetic algorithm. The generated
pdbqt file for the enzyme was set as a rigid macromolecule, and the
genetic algorithm search parameters were set to 100 GA runs for each
ligand with a population size of 150, a maximum number of 2.5 ×
105 energy evaluations, a maximum number of 2.7 ×
104 generations, a mutation rate of 0.2, and a crossover
rate of 0.8. The docking parameters were set to default. The output
DLG file was converted to pdbqt format, and the results were visualized
in PyMOL. The lowest-energy pose consistent with metal binding is
shown in Figure 1B.
Authors: Leila Alland; Gregory David; Hong Shen-Li; Jason Potes; Rebecca Muhle; Hye-Chun Lee; Harry Hou; Ken Chen; Ronald A DePinho Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: E Hu; Z Chen; T Fredrickson; Y Zhu; R Kirkpatrick; G F Zhang; K Johanson; C M Sung; R Liu; J Winkler Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-05-19 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Gerda Lagger; Dónal O'Carroll; Martina Rembold; Harald Khier; Julia Tischler; Georg Weitzer; Bernd Schuettengruber; Christoph Hauser; Reinhard Brunmeir; Thomas Jenuwein; Christian Seiser Journal: EMBO J Date: 2002-06-03 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: I Van den Wyngaert; W de Vries; A Kremer; J Neefs; P Verhasselt; W H Luyten; S U Kass Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2000-07-28 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Anton V Bieliauskas; Sujith V W Weerasinghe; Ahmed T Negmeldin; Mary Kay H Pflum Journal: Arch Pharm (Weinheim) Date: 2016-04-09 Impact factor: 3.751
Authors: Pravin Bhansali; Christin L Hanigan; Lalith Perera; Robert A Casero; L M Viranga Tillekeratne Journal: Eur J Med Chem Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 6.514