Literature DB >> 24405185

Decomposing decision components in the stop-signal task: a model-based approach to individual differences in inhibitory control.

Corey N White1, Eliza Congdon, Jeanette A Mumford, Katherine H Karlsgodt, Fred W Sabb, Nelson B Freimer, Edythe D London, Tyrone D Cannon, Robert M Bilder, Russell A Poldrack.   

Abstract

The stop-signal task, in which participants must inhibit prepotent responses, has been used to identify neural systems that vary with individual differences in inhibitory control. To explore how these differences relate to other aspects of decision making, a drift-diffusion model of simple decisions was fitted to stop-signal task data from go trials to extract measures of caution, motor execution time, and stimulus processing speed for each of 123 participants. These values were used to probe fMRI data to explore individual differences in neural activation. Faster processing of the go stimulus correlated with greater activation in the right frontal pole for both go and stop trials. On stop trials, stimulus processing speed also correlated with regions implicated in inhibitory control, including the right inferior frontal gyrus, medial frontal gyrus, and BG. Individual differences in motor execution time correlated with activation of the right parietal cortex. These findings suggest a robust relationship between the speed of stimulus processing and inhibitory processing at the neural level. This model-based approach provides novel insight into the interrelationships among decision components involved in inhibitory control and raises interesting questions about strategic adjustments in performance and inhibitory deficits associated with psychopathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24405185      PMCID: PMC4119005          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  37 in total

1.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

2.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Polydrug abusers display impaired discrimination-reversal learning in a model of behavioural control.

Authors:  Mark T Fillmore; Craig R Rush
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 4.153

Review 4.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 6.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades.

Authors:  Leanne Boucher; Thomas J Palmeri; Gordon D Logan; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders.

Authors:  Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff; Michael W Vasey; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

9.  Perceptual criteria in the human brain.

Authors:  Corey N White; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Measurement and reliability of response inhibition.

Authors:  Eliza Congdon; Jeanette A Mumford; Jessica R Cohen; Adriana Galvan; Turhan Canli; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-21
View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  The importance of decision onset.

Authors:  Tobias Teichert; Jack Grinband; Vincent Ferrera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Differential patterns of functional and structural plasticity within and between inferior frontal gyri support training-induced improvements in inhibitory control proficiency.

Authors:  Camille F Chavan; Michael Mouthon; Bogdan Draganski; Wietske van der Zwaag; Lucas Spierer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The Right Superior Frontal Gyrus and Individual Variation in Proactive Control of Impulsive Response.

Authors:  Sien Hu; Jaime S Ide; Sheng Zhang; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Accumulation of non-numerical evidence during nonsymbolic number processing in the brain: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Tali Leibovich; Daniel Ansari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Strategic down-regulation of attentional resources as a mechanism of proactive response inhibition.

Authors:  Zachary D Langford; Ruth M Krebs; Durk Talsma; Marty G Woldorff; C N Boehler
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Approaches to Analysis in Model-based Cognitive Neuroscience.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Birte U Forstmann; Bradley C Love; Thomas J Palmeri; Leendert Van Maanen
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.223

7.  Testing the validity of conflict drift-diffusion models for use in estimating cognitive processes: A parameter-recovery study.

Authors:  Corey N White; Mathieu Servant; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

8.  How attention influences perceptual decision making: Single-trial EEG correlates of drift-diffusion model parameters.

Authors:  Michael D Nunez; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.223

9.  Slow drift rate predicts ADHD symptomology over and above executive dysfunction.

Authors:  Jason S Feldman; Cynthia Huang-Pollock
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.597

10.  Processing speed dysfunction is associated with functional corticostriatal circuit alterations in childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes: a PET and fMRI study.

Authors:  Yuting Li; Teng Zhang; Jianhua Feng; Shufang Qian; Shuang Wu; Rui Zhou; Jing Wang; Guo Sa; Xiawan Wang; Lina Li; Feng Chen; Hong Yang; Hong Zhang; Mei Tian
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.