Literature DB >> 24405053

A pilot study of potential pre-operative barriers to couples' sexual recovery after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Daniela Wittmann1, Laurel Northouse, Heather Crossley, David Miller, Rodney Dunn, Jennifer Nidetz, Jeanne Montie, Mia Moyad, Katie Lavin, James E Montie.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer affects couples' sexual intimacy, but men rarely use recommended proerectile aids. This mixed-methods study aimed to identify couples' preprostatectomy barriers to sexual recovery. Interviews about anticipated sexual recovery were paired with surveys: the Dyadic Assessment Scale, the Protective Buffering Scale, the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite, the Sexual Experience Questionnaire (men), and the Female Sexual Function Index. Potential barriers were derived using Grounded Theory. Quantitative data triangulated qualitative findings. Heterosexual couples (N = 28) participated. Men's average age was 62 years and their partners' average age was 58 years. Preexisting and diagnosis-related barriers included aging-related sexual dysfunction, inadequate sexual problem-solving skills, stressors, worry, avoidance of planning for sexual recovery, and dislike of artificially assisted sex. Participants endorsed moderate/high marital satisfaction (DAS: for men, M = 110.0, SD = 11.4; for partners, M = 114.1, SD = 12.1) and communication (PBS: for men, M = 24.5.2, SD = 6.1; for partners, M = 25.1, SD ± 6.2). Men reported mild erectile dysfunction and incontinence (EPIC sexual function M = 76.6, SD = 21.5, urinary incontinence M = 88.4, SD = 18.2). Men's couple sexual satisfaction was lowest (Sexual Experience Questionnaire: M = 60.1, SD = 26.9). Mean total Female Sexual Function Index was low (M = 21.6, SD = 7.8). Heterosexual couples face prostatectomy-related sexual side-effects having experienced developmental sexual losses. Couples use avoidant strategies to defend against worry about cancer and anticipated prostatectomy-related sexual changes. These potential barriers are modifiable if couples can learn to cope with sexual losses and accept sexual rehabilitation strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24405053      PMCID: PMC4506793          DOI: 10.1080/0092623X.2013.842194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther        ISSN: 0092-623X


  30 in total

1.  The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function.

Authors:  R Rosen; C Brown; J Heiman; S Leiblum; C Meston; R Shabsigh; D Ferguson; R D'Agostino
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun

2.  A model of women's sexual arousal.

Authors:  Rosemary Basson
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

3.  The interpersonal process model of intimacy: the role of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Jamie Ostroff; Christine Rini; Kevin Fox; Lori Goldstein; Generosa Grana
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2004-12

4.  Psycho-social transitions: a field for study.

Authors:  C M Parkes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The aftermath of breast cancer: an altered sexual self.

Authors:  M C Wilmoth
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.592

6.  Sexual dysfunction in female partners of men who have undergone radical prostatectomy correlates with sexual dysfunction of the male partner.

Authors:  Alan Shindel; Sejal Quayle; Yan Yan; Adnan Husain; Cathy Naughton
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  J T Wei; R L Dunn; M S Litwin; H M Sandler; M G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Living after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis of patient narratives.

Authors:  Oliver Hedestig; Per-Olof Sandman; Radisa Tomic; Anders Widmark
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  Use of medications or devices for erectile dysfunction among long-term prostate cancer treatment survivors: potential influence of sexual motivation and/or indifference.

Authors:  David C Miller; John T Wei; Rodney L Dunn; James E Montie; Hector Pimentel; Howard M Sandler; P William McLaughlin; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Finding help for sexual problems after prostate cancer treatment: a phone survey of men's and women's perspectives.

Authors:  Leah E Neese; Leslie R Schover; Eric A Klein; Craig Zippe; Patrick A Kupelian
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Focusing on sexual rehabilitation besides penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy is important.

Authors:  Daphné Vanderhaeghe; Maarten Albersen; Emmanuel Weyne
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  Prostate cancer and the impact on couples: a qualitative metasynthesis.

Authors:  Nicole Collaço; Carol Rivas; Lauren Matheson; Johana Nayoan; Richard Wagland; Obrey Alexis; Anna Gavin; Adam Glaser; Eila Watson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  What couples say about their recovery of sexual intimacy after prostatectomy: toward the development of a conceptual model of couples' sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Wittmann; Marsha Carolan; Barbara Given; Ted A Skolarus; Heather Crossley; Lawrence An; Ganesh Palapattu; Patricia Clark; James E Montie
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 4.  Psychosocial contributors to patients' and partners' postprostate cancer sexual recovery: 10 evidence-based and practical considerations.

Authors:  Lauren M Walker
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  Exploring the role of the partner in couples' sexual recovery after surgery for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Wittmann; Marsha Carolan; Barbara Given; Ted A Skolarus; Lawrence An; Ganesh Palapattu; James E Montie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: prevalence, medical treatments, and psychosocial interventions.

Authors:  Jessica C Emanu; Isabelle K Avildsen; Christian J Nelson
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.302

7.  EQUINOXE study: Impact of relational cohesion and sexuality on the quality of life of patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stéphane Droupy; Marie-Hélène Colson; Nathalie Pello-Leprince-Ringuet; Valérie Perrot; Aurélien Descazeaud
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-10-19

8.  TrueNTH sexual recovery study protocol: a multi-institutional collaborative approach to developing and testing a web-based intervention for couples coping with the side-effects of prostate cancer treatment in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  D Wittmann; A Mehta; L Northouse; R Dunn; T Braun; A Duby; L An; L Arab; R Bangs; S Bober; J Brandon; M Coward; M Dunn; M Galbraith; M Garcia; J Giblin; M Glode; B Koontz; A Lowe; S Mitchell; J Mulhall; C Nelson; K Paich; C Saigal; T Skolarus; J Stanford; T Walsh; C E Pollack
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Predictors of well-being and quality of life in men who underwent radical prostatectomy: longitudinal study1.

Authors:  Adilson Edson Romanzini; Maria da Graça Pereira; Caroline Guilherme; Adauto José Cologna; Emilia Campos de Carvalho
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2018-09-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.